Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Digital mammograms

Fig. 2.8. Digital mammogram (a) before and (b) after flat-field correction (from Digital Mammography, eds. ED Pisano,... Fig. 2.8. Digital mammogram (a) before and (b) after flat-field correction (from Digital Mammography, eds. ED Pisano,...
Barten PGJ (1992) Physical model for contrast sensitivity of the human eye. Proc SPIE 1666 57-72 Burch A, Whelehan P, Young KCS (2007) Cush, Routine quality control tests for hill field digital mammography systems. NHSBSP Equipment Report 0702 Carton AK,Bosmans H,Van OngevalQet al (2003) Development and validation of a simulation procedure to study the visi-hihty of micro calcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys 30 2234-2240... [Pg.54]

Fig. 5.2. Full field digital mammograms (Hologic Selenia) processed with a characteristic curve of a Kodak Min-R 2000 system to give them a film-like appearance. The two mammograms are prior (top) and current (bottom) mammograms of the same patient... Fig. 5.2. Full field digital mammograms (Hologic Selenia) processed with a characteristic curve of a Kodak Min-R 2000 system to give them a film-like appearance. The two mammograms are prior (top) and current (bottom) mammograms of the same patient...
Fig. S.S. A raw digital mammogram from a Lorad Sele-nia processed using nonspatial processing and peripheral enhancement (a). Figure (b) shows results obtained by ap-... Fig. S.S. A raw digital mammogram from a Lorad Sele-nia processed using nonspatial processing and peripheral enhancement (a). Figure (b) shows results obtained by ap-...
A wavelet technique for spatial enhancement of microcalcifications in mammograms was evaluated by Kallergi et al. (1996). Digitized mammograms were... [Pg.82]

Campanini R, Dongiovanni D, lampieri E, et al (2004) A novel featiueless approach to mass detection in digital mammograms based on support vector machines. Phys Med Biol 49 961-975... [Pg.102]

Huo Z, Giger ML, Olopade 01, et al (2002a) Computerized Analysis of Digitized Mammograms of BRCAl and BRCA2 Gene Mutation Carriers. Radiology 225 519-526... [Pg.104]

Kupinski M, Giger ML (1998) Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imag 17 510-517... [Pg.104]

Penedo M, Souto M, Tahoces PG et al (2005) Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms. Radiology 237 450-457... [Pg.143]

Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO et al (2002) Interpretation of digital mammograms comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 223(2) 483-488... [Pg.143]

Fig. 13.7. Example of a tumor that is difficult to see on the original digital mammogram (right) and in slit-scan DBT. Fig. 13.7. Example of a tumor that is difficult to see on the original digital mammogram (right) and in slit-scan DBT.
Detection of masses in digitized mammograms started around 1967 using an approach inspired by a human reader each woman has her own unique structure and distribution of glandular tissue within the breast that is normally considered to be symmetric between both sides. Therefore, a radiologist compares the right and left breasts during visual... [Pg.361]

See other pages where Digital mammograms is mentioned: [Pg.13]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.738]    [Pg.739]    [Pg.739]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.369]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.720 ]



SEARCH



Mammogram

© 2024 chempedia.info