Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion evaluation

Simulation and predictive modeling of contaminant transport in the environment are only as good as the data input used in these models. Field methods differ from laboratory methods in that an increase in the scale of measurement relative to most laboratory methods is involved. Determination of transport parameters (i. e., transmission coefficients) must also use actual contaminant chemical species and field solid phase samples if realistic values are to be specified for the transport models. The choice of type of test, e.g., leaching cells and diffusion tests, depends on personal preference and availability of material. No test is significantly better than another. Most of the tests for diffusion evaluation are flawed to a certain extent. [Pg.234]

BCls -> B Ga(CH3)3 + AsH3—> GaAs 165, 208, 224 Similarity solution of ideal axisymmetric flow, multicomponent diffusion, evaluation of thermodiffusion, multiple gas-phase and surface reactions, and thermodynamic analysis of reaction pathways and species. [Pg.252]

The general range of hydrocarbon-air premixed flame speeds falls around 40 cm/s. Using a value of thermal diffusivity evaluated at a mean temperature of 1300 K, one can estimate to be close to 0.1 cm. Thus, hydrocarbon-air flames have a characteristic length of the order of 1 mm. The characteristic time is ( /5l ). and for these flames this value is estimated to be of the order of a few milliseconds. If one assumes that the overall activation energy of the hydrocarbon-air process is... [Pg.130]

In applying the burning method of diffusivity evaluation, it is important to ascertain that the reaction is definitely diffusion controlled. When this is the case, no increase of rate should result when the temperature of combustion is raised. This can serve as a test for this requirement. As a reference point for orientation, a 3 to 4 mm, diameter particle of... [Pg.194]

ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS FOR ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION evaluated along the plume centerline ( v = 0) at the ground (z = 0),... [Pg.934]

In the event that the fan is not operating or the ventilation ducting is decoupled from the fan, there is no mechanism to draw contamination out of the SCBs. Release of hazardous material under these circumstances would occur at a rate determined by diffusion. Evaluations of transport of radionuclides under these conditions indicate that buildup of fission products in Zone 2 of the HCF several hours after the event is less than one microcurie. Transport of these fission products outside the confines of the HCF would be negligible, and dose consequences at 3000 meters would be negligible. [Pg.188]

Here Djj o is the binary diffusivity evaluated at some reference total pressure pjo-The parameter Ko is the Knudsen flow parameter and like Bq for viscous flow it is also a function of solid structure only. [Pg.586]

Here Tq is some reference temperature and Dpo is the pore diffusivity evaluated at that temperature. The parameter a is equal to 0.5 when Knudsen controls the pore diffusion and to 1.75 where molecular-molecular collision mechanism controls the transport. The volumetric average concentration of the adsorbed species in eq. (10.4-3 8a) is... [Pg.651]

The selection of the thermal management materials for electronic packaging purposes demands close examination of thermophysical characteristics, such as thermal conductivity and diffusivity, specific heat capacity, coefficient of thermal expansion, and thermal shock resistance. A variety of measurement techniques have been developed to evaluate these properties, but this chapter focuses on thermal conductivity and diffusivity evaluation methods. Each of them is suitable for a limited range of materials, depending on the thermal properties and the medium temperature. The precise determination of the thermal properties of bulk composite materials is challenging. For instance, loss terms for the heat input intended to flow through the sample usually exist and can be difficult to quantify. [Pg.200]


See other pages where Diffusion evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.306]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.380]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.168 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion coefficient evaluation

Diffusivity evaluation

Diffusivity evaluation

Diffusivity evaluation breakthrough time

Diffusivity evaluation parameters

Mass diffusion process evaluation

© 2024 chempedia.info