Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Limiting diffusion current concept

The mercury dropping electrode was first introduced to electrolysis by J. Heyrovsky.< > The most important milestones in the theoretical development of polarography were the exact deduction of the equation for the limiting diffusion current by D. Ilkovi(5,< > of the equation for the shape of polarographic wave by J. Heyrov-sky and D. Ilkovic, the introduction of the conception of halfwave potentials by the same authors, the recognition of catalytic< > and adsorption currents by R. Brdicka and the development of the theory of kinetic currents by K. Wiesner, R. Brdicka, J. [Pg.319]

Cathodic vanadium reduction in VCl2-NaCl-KCl melts proceeds in one mass transfer-controlled two-electron step. It was shown that, at high cathodic current densities, the formation of alkali metal can affect voltammetry measurements. The necessity of separating the concepts of limiting diffusion current density and current density corresponding to the expansion of the cathode deposit was justified. [Pg.280]

In the above section, all the equations we derived are based on pure electron transfer kinetics. Unfortunately, in reality, mass transfer (e.g. hydrogen diffusion inside a porous fuel ceU CL) will have an effect on the overall reaction rate, and sometimes can become the rate-determining step. To address this mass transfer effect, we need to introduce another concept, called limiting diffusion current density, which can be expressed as in Eqns (1.35) and (1.36) [9] ... [Pg.21]

The dependence of the limiting current density on the rate of stirring was first established in 1904 by Nernst (N2) and Brunner (Blla). They interpreted this dependence using the stagnant layer concept first proposed by Noyes and Whitney. The thickness of this layer ( Nernst diffusion layer thickness ) was correlated simply with the speed of the stirring impeller or rotated electrode tip. [Pg.217]

While catalytic HDM results in a desirable, nearly metal-free product, the catalyst in the reactor is laden with metal sulfide deposits that eventually result in deactivation. Loss of catalyst activity is attributed to both the physical obstruction of the catalyst pellets pores by deposits and to the chemical contamination of the active catalytic sites by deposits. The radial metal deposit distribution in catalyst pellets is easily observed and understood in terms of the classic theory of diffusion and reaction in porous media. Application of the theory for the design and development of HDM and HDS catalysts has proved useful. Novel concepts and approaches to upgrading metal-laden heavy residua will require more information. However, detailed examination of the chemical and physical structure of the metal deposits is not possible because of current analytical limitations for microscopically complex and heterogeneous materials. Similarly, experimental methods that reveal the complexities of the fine structure of porous materials and theoretical methods to describe them are not yet... [Pg.250]

For a number of years the existence of a porous or polar pathway through the stratum comeum, in parallel with the lipoidal pathway, has been hypothesized. Although there has been some criticism of this concept, it is our belief that the root of the lack of a common consensus among scientists in the field can be attributed largely to the limited number of systematic studies in the literature that directly address the issue of the diffusion of polar and ionic permeants across skin. Based upon recent studies that have focused upon this aspect of transdermal diffusion, the existence of a porous permeation pathway through HEM is clear (Hatanaka et al., 1993, 1994 Peck et al., 1993, 1994, 1995). At this point, we have made no attempt to correlate the findings from our studies with specific structural properties of the HEM. In some cases, authors have implicated shunt routes such as hair follicles and sweat ducts to account for permeation data not consistent with the concept of lipoidal membrane permeation (Cornwell and Barry, 1993 Scheuplein and Blank, 1971). Under ionto-phoretic conditions, such shunt routes have been shown to contribute to current conduction (Cullander and Guy, 1991 Scott et al., 1993). When efforts have been made to estimate the effective Rp of skin samples under iontophoretic conditions (Ruddy and Hadzija, 1992), osmotic conditions (Hatanaka et al.,... [Pg.285]

Recently, it was reported by Pyun et al. thatthe CTs of transition metal oxides such as Lii 8CoO2 [14,77-79], l i,, AiO. [11,12], Li, sMii.O [17,80,81], Lij + 8[Ti5/3Lii/3]O4 [11, 28], V2O5 [11, 55] and carbonaceous materials [18, 82-84] hardly exhibit a typical trend of diffusion-controlled lithium transport - that is, Cottrell behavior. Rather, it was found that the current-potential relationship would hold Ohm s law during the CT experiments, and it was suggested that lithium transport at the interface of electrode and electrolyte was mainly limited by internal cell resistance, and not by lithium diffusion in the bulk electrode. This concept is referred to as cell-impedance-controlled lithium transport. [Pg.150]

Chronocoulometry enables the exact estimation of amount of adsorbed electroactive substances according to the concept proposed 30 years ago [217]. Usually, it is assumed that the reactant A adsorbed at the electrode surface is reduced/oxidized simultaneously in the free and adsorbed form. When the potential is stepped from the potential Ej, where no electrolysis takes place, to potential Ef, enforcing the diffusion-limited current, then the charge Qf (in C) consumed during the time t < tr is expressed as... [Pg.142]


See other pages where Limiting diffusion current concept is mentioned: [Pg.117]    [Pg.1491]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.1319]    [Pg.658]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.555]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.833]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.173]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.1491 ]




SEARCH



Current concepts

Current limit

Diffusion current

Diffusion limit

Diffusion limitation

Diffusion limiting

Diffusive limit

Limitation current

Limited currents

Limiting currents

Limiting diffusion current

Limiting diffusivity

© 2024 chempedia.info