Boundary conditions, diffusion

Solution. The basic differential equation is in a form that holds for both growth and evaporation. The diffusion boundary conditions are the same for the two cases, and therefore the solution is equally applicable. Finally, the same expression for the efficiency of the surface is obtained. (Note that the two changes of sign encountered in its derivation cancel.)... 

In what follows, the equation of diffusion derived in Chapter 2 is generalized to take into account the effect of flow. For point particles (dp = 0), rates of convective diffusion can often be predicted from theory or from experiment with aqueous solutions because the Schmidt numbers are of the same order of magnitude. There is an extensive literature on this subject to which the reader is directed. For particle diffusion, there is a difference from the usual theory of convective diffusion because of the special boundary condition The concentration vanishes at a distance of one particle radius from the surface. This has a very large effect on particle deposition rates and causes considerable difficulty in the mathematical theory. As discussed in this chapter, the theory can be simplified by incorporating the particle radius in the diffusion boundary condition. 

Geometric Optics Results with Emission. When the temperature of a semitransparent layer is large, emission of radiation becomes significant, and the problem of radiative transfer becomes more complex. The change in refractive index at each interface causes total internal reflection of radiation in the medium with higher refractive index at the boundary. This effect must be treated in the RTE at the boundary of the medium, and diffuse boundary conditions are no longer correct for the exact solution of this type of problem. Various approaches have been attempted. 

Semi-infinite linear diffusion conditions The rate of an electrochemical process depends not only on electrode kinetics but also on the transport of species to/from the bulk solution. Mass transport can occur by diffusion, convection or migration. Generally, in a spectroeiectrochemicai experiment, conditions are chosen in which migration and convection effects are negligible. The solution of diffusion equations, that is the discovery of an equation for the calculation of oxidized form [O] and reduced form [R] concentrations as functions of distance from electrode and time, requires boundary conditions to be assumed. Usually the electrochemical cell is so large relative to the length of the diffusion path that effects at walls of the cell are not felt at the electrode. For semiinfinite linear diffusion boundary conditions, one can assume that at large distances from the electrode the concentration reaches a constant value. 

If tire diffusion coefficient is independent of tire concentration, equation (C2.1.22) reduces to tire usual fonn of Pick s second law. Analytical solutions to diffusion equations for several types of boundary conditions have been derived [M]- In tlie particular situation of a steady state, tire flux is constant. Using Henry s law (c = kp) to relate tire concentration on both sides of tire membrane to tire partial pressure, tire constant flux can be written as... 

Here f denotes the fraction of molecules diffusely scattered at the surface and I is the mean free path. If distance is measured on a scale whose unit is comparable with the dimensions of the flow channel and is some suitable characteristic fluid velocity, such as the center-line velocity, then dv/dx v and f <<1. Provided a significant proportion of incident molecules are scattered diffusely at the wall, so that f is not too small, it then follows from (4.8) that G l, and hence from (4.7) that V v° at the wall. Consequently a good approximation to the correct boundary condition is obtained by setting v = 0 at the wall. ... 

Equipped with a proper boundary condition and a complete solution for the mass mean velocity, let us now turn attention to the diffusion equations (4.1) which must be satisfied everywhere. Since all the vectors must... 

This treatment of reaction at the limit of bulk diffusion control is essentially the same as that presented by HugoC 69j. It is attractive computationally, since only a single two-point boundary value problem must be solved, namely that posed by equations (11.15) and conditions (11.16). This must be re-solved each time the size of the pellet is changed, since the pellet radius a appears in the boundary conditions. However, the initial value problem for equations (11.12) need be solved only once as a preliminary to solving (11.15) and (11.16) for any number of different pellet sizes. 

Example The equation 3c/3f = D(3 c/3a. ) represents the diffusion in a semi-infinite medium, a. > 0. Under the boundary conditions c(0, t) = Cq, c(x, 0) = 0 find a solution of the diffusion equation. By taking the Laplace transform of both sides with respect to t,... 

T he total or global solar radiation has a direct part (beam radiation) and a diffuse part (Fig. 11.31). In the simulation, solar radiation input values must be converted to radiation values for each surface of the building. For nonhorizontal surfaces, the diffuse radiation is composed of (a) the contribution from the diffuse sky and (b) reflections from the ground. The diffuse sky radiation is not uniform. It is composed of three parts, referred to as isotropic, circumsolar, and horizontal brightening. Several diffuse sky models are available. Depending on the model used, discrepancies for the boundary conditions may occur with the same basic set of solar radiation data, thus leading to differences in the simulation results. 

These apparent restrictions in size and length of simulation time of the fully quantum-mechanical methods or molecular-dynamics methods with continuous degrees of freedom in real space are the basic reason why the direct simulation of lattice models of the Ising type or of solid-on-solid type is still the most popular technique to simulate crystal growth processes. Consequently, a substantial part of this article will deal with scientific problems on those time and length scales which are simultaneously accessible by the experimental STM methods on one hand and by Monte Carlo lattice simulations on the other hand. Even these methods, however, are too microscopic to incorporate the boundary conditions from the laboratory set-up into the models in a reahstic way. Therefore one uses phenomenological models of the phase-field or sharp-interface type, and finally even finite-element methods, to treat the diffusion transport and hydrodynamic convections which control a reahstic crystal growth process from the melt on an industrial scale. 

It is not an easy task to develop computer codes which correctly treat the advancement of a folding interface as a boundary condition to a diffusion or flow field. In addition, the interface between a solid and a liquid, for example, is usually is not absolutely sharp on an atomic scale, but varies over a few lattice constants [32,33]. In these cases, it is sometimes convenient to treat the interface as having a finite non-zero thickness. An order parameter is then introduced, which for example varies from the value zero on one side of the interface to the value one on the other, representing a smooth transition from liquid to solid across the interface. This is called the phase-field... 

To be specific, we consider the two-dimensional growth of a pure substance from its undercooled melt in about its simplest form, where the growth is controlled by the diffusion of the latent heat of freezing. It obeys the diffusion equation and appropriate boundary conditions [95]... 

Studies of double carrier injection and transport in insulators and semiconductors (the so called bipolar current problem) date all the way back to the 1950s. A solution that relates to the operation of OLEDs was provided recently by Scott et al. [142], who extended the work of Parmenter and Ruppel [143] to include Lange-vin recombination. In order to obtain an analytic solution, diffusion was ignored and the electron and hole mobilities were taken to be electric field-independent. The current-voltage relation was derived and expressed in terms of two independent boundary conditions, the relative electron contributions to the current at the anode, jJfVj, and at the cathode, JKplJ. 

The overall set of partial differential equations that can be considered as a mathematical characterization of the processing system of gas-liquid dispersions should include such environmental parameters as composition, temperature, and velocity, in addition to the equations of bubble-size and residence-time distributions that describe the dependence of bubble nucleation and growth on the bubble environmental factors. A simultaneous solution of this set of differential equations with the appropriate initial and boundary conditions is needed to evaluate the behavior of the system. Subject to the Curie principle, this set of equations should include the possibilities of coupling effects among the various fluxes involved. In dispersions, the possibilities of couplings between fluxes that differ from each other by an odd tensorial rank exist. (An example is the coupling effect between diffusion of surfactants and the hydrodynamics of bubble velocity as treated in Section III.) As yet no analytical solution of the complete set of equations has been found because of the mathematical difficulties involved. To simplify matters, the pertinent transfer equation is usually solved independently, with some simplifying assumptions. 

The last boundary condition results from the assumption that for the relatively short contact times occurring in real systems, the effect of diffusion at b is negligible, and, therefore, a change in concentration at this point results only from chemical reaction. 

If the thickness of the diffusion boundary layer is smaller than b — a (and also smaller than a), one may consider that the diffusion takes place from the sphere to an infinite liquid. It should be emphasized here that the thickness of the diffusion boundary layer is usually about 10 % of the thickness of the hydrodynamic boundary layer (L3). Hence this condition imposes no contradiction to the requirements of the free surface model and Eq. (195). ... 

Again, the form of the concentration profile in the diffusion boundary layer depends on the conditions which are assumed to exist at the surface and in the fluid stream. For the conditions corresponding to those used in consideration of the thermal boundary layer, that is constant concentrations both in the stream outside the boundary layer and at the surface, the concentration profile is of similar form to that given by equation 11.70 ... 

The basic equation and boundary conditions for the symmetrical fluctuations are the same as those for the asymmetrical fluctuations except for the superscript s. The diffusion equation is written in the form... 

Then the diffusion equation for the fluctuation of the metal ion concentration is given by Eq. (68), and the mass balance at the film/solution interface is expressed by Eq. (69). These fluctuation equations are also solved with the same boundary condition as shown in Eq. (70). 

---