Differential equations elliptic form

Given a partial differential equation of the elliptic form... 

Chapters 2-5 are concerned with concrete difference schemes for equations of elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic types. Chapter 3 focuses on homogeneous difference schemes for ordinary differential equations, by means of which we try to solve the canonical problem of the theory of difference schemes in which a primary family of difference schemes is specified (in such a case the availability of the family is provided by pattern functionals) and schemes of a desired quality should be selected within the primary family. This problem is solved in Chapter 3 using a particular form of the scheme and its solution leads us to conservative homogeneous schemes. 

The theory for classifying linear, second-order, partial-differential equations is well established. Understanding the classification is quite important to understanding solution algorithms and where boundary conditions must be applied. Partial differential equations are generally classified as one of three forms elliptic, parabolic, or hyperbolic. Model equations for each type are usually stated as... 

The Laplace operator V2 takes the form given in equations (2.11), (2.12) and (2.13) for the different coordinate systems. The differential equations (2.15) and (2.16) for steady-state temperature fields, are linear and elliptical, as long as W is independent of, or changes linearly with d. This leads to different methods of solution than those used in transient conduction where the differential equations are parabolic. 

The exact form of the matrices Qi and Q2 depends on the type of partial differential equations that make up the system of equations describing the process units, i.e., parabolic, elliptic, or hyperbolic, as well as the type of applicable boundary conditions, i.e., Dirichlet, Neuman, or Robin boundary conditions. The matrix G contains the source terms as well as any nonlinear terms present in F. It may or may not be averaged over two successive times corresponding to the indices n and n + 1. The numerical scheme solves for the unknown dependent variables at time t = (n + l)At and all spatial positions on the grid in terms of the values of the dependent variables at time t = nAt and all spatial positions. Boundary conditions of the Neuman or Robin type, which involve evaluation of the flux at the boundary, require additional consideration. The approximation of the derivative at the boundary by a finite difference introduces an error into the calculation at the boundary that propagates inward from the boundary as the computation steps forward in time. This requires a modification of the algorithm to compensate for this effect. 

The governing equations, along with the appropriate constitutive relations, completely describe the fluid flow within a given geometry. However, the mathematical model forms a system of partial differential equations obeying mixed elliptic-parabolic behaviour which cannot be solved unless we specify the boundary conditions for the problem. Mathematically they fix the integration constants yielded upon integration. From a physical point of... 

Employing finite differencing on a set of grid points defining the discrete grid denoted by il , this elliptic differential equation is transformed into an algebraic matrix equation of the form... 

The initial-boundary value problem represented by Eq. 7.1 can be transmuted into a boundary integral equation by several different methods. Brebbia and Walker (1980) and Curran et al. (1980) approximated the time derivative in the equation in a finite difference form, thus changing the original parabolic partial differential equation to an elliptical partial differential equation, for which the standard boundary integral equation may be established. 

Equation 8.93 is an elliptical partial differential equation, and it is similar in form to Eq. 8.75, so that its fundamental solutions have the same form as Eq. 8.79, with At replaced by 1/s. The boundary integral equation for Eq. 8.93 is... 

Linear second-order partial differential equations in two independent variables are further classified into three canonical forms elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic. The general form of this class of equations is... 

We begin our discussion of numerical solutions of elliptic differential equations by first examining the two-dimensional problem in its general form (Laplace s equation) ... 

Example 6.1 Solution of the Laplace and Poisson Equations. Write a general MATLAB function to determine the numerical solution of a two-dimensional elliptic partial differential equation of the general form ... 

Such a classification can also be applied to higher order equations involving more than two independent variables. Typically elliptic equations are associated with physical systems involving equilibrium states, parabolic equations are associated with diffusion type problems and hyperbolic equations are associated with oscillating or vibrating physical systems. Analytical closed form solutions are known for some linear partial differential equations. However, numerical solutions must be obtained for most partial differential equations and for almost all nonlinear equations. 

---