Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Difference Patterson maps

Difference Fourier techniques are most useful in locating sites in a multisite derivative, when a Patterson map is too complicated to be interpretable. The phases for such a Fourier must be calculated from the heavy-atom model of other derivatives in which a difference Patterson map was successfully interpreted, and should not be obtained from the derivative being tested, in order not to bias the phases. Also, difference Fourier techniques can be used to test the correctness of an already identified heavy-atom site by removing that site from the phasing model and seeing whether it will appear in... [Pg.93]

Find the locations of the heavy aiom[s) from a difference Patterson map. [Pg.327]

Anomalous scattering can also be used directly if the protein is small and a suitable anomalous scatterer can be used. The three-dimensional structure of the small protein, crambin, was determined by W ayne A. Hendrickson and Martha Teeter by the use of anomalous dispersion measurements. This protein contains 45 amino acid residues and diffracts to 0.88 A resolution. It crystallizes with 72 water and four ethanol molecules per protein molecule. Since there is a sulfur atom in the protein molecule, the use of its anomalous scattering was made. The nearest absorption edge of sulfur lies at 5.02 A, but for Cu Ka radiation, wavelength 1.5418 A, values of A/ and A/" for sulfur are 0.3 and 0.557, respectively. Friedel-related pairs of reflections were measured to 1.5 A resolution, and sulfur atom positions were computed from difference Patterson maps. The structure is now fully refined and a portion of an a helix was shown in Figure 12.27 (Chapter 12). [Pg.612]

Soak complexes of heavy atoms of various kinds into a crystal. Screen diffraction data from heavy-atom derivatives of the protein for differences in intensities from those in the native data set. Calculate difference Patterson maps and locate the positions of the heavy atoms in the unit cell. [Pg.824]

As with the isomorphous replacement technique it is necessary to identify the positions, the x, y, z coordinates of the anomalous scatterers. This can be done by anomalous difference Patterson maps, which are Patterson syntheses that use the anomalous differences Fhki — F—h—k—i as coefficients (Blow and Rossmann, 1961). These maps are interpreted identically to isomorphous difference Patterson maps (see Chapter 9). Rapidly surpassing Patterson approaches, particularly for selenomethionine problems and others where the number of anomalous scatterers tends to be large, are direct methods (see below). These are strictly mathematical methods that have proved to be surprisingly effective in revealing the constellation of anomalous scatterers in a unit cell. [Pg.190]

The Patterson function has been employed since its formulation in 1935 for determining the locations of heavy atoms in crystals of conventional compounds. This alone made possible application of the heavy atom technique (see Chapter 8) for structure determination. For conventional molecules the information for the heavy atom positions is contained entirely within the native diffraction data, unlike macromolecules, where the information is embedded in differences between two independent data sets, or differences between Friedel mates. Aside from the coefficients employed, use of the function is virtually identical in all cases. Perhaps the major difference arises from the fact that diffraction data from macromolecular crystals, and therefore corresponding difference Patterson maps, contain more noise than... [Pg.193]

FIGURE 9.2 A section from a difference Patterson map calculated between a heavy atom derivative and native diffraction data (known as a difference Patterson map). This map is for a mercury derivative of a crystal of bacterial xylanase. The plane of Patterson density shown here corresponds to all values of u and w for which v =. Because the space group of this crystal is P2, this section of the Patterson map is a Harker section containing peaks denoting vectors between 2t symmetry related heavy atoms. [Pg.196]

FIGURE 9.11 The w = j plane of the difference Patterson map for the K2HgI4 heavy atom derivative of the hexagonal crystal form of the protein canavalin. The space group is P6, so w = is a Harker section. The derivative crystal contained two major K2HgI4 substitution sites and one minor substitution site per asymmetric unit. The Patterson peaks corresponding to those sites are marked with crosses. Note that the Patterson peak corresponding to the minor site cannot be discriminated from noise peaks in the Patterson map as is often the case. [Pg.208]

Another problem that frequently arises with multiple isomorphous derivatives is that of handedness. In space group P2i2i2i, Patterson maps for two independent derivatives may be interpreted to yield a set of symmetry related sites for one derivative and, independently, a second set for the other. Because handedness is completely absent in a Patterson map (because it contains a center of symmetry), there is an equal chance that the heavy atom constellation for the first will be right handed, and the constellation for the other will be left handed, and vice versa. This won t do. The two heavy atom sets will not cooperate when used to obtain phase information. There are ways of unraveling this problem too, and once again, it involves difference Patterson maps between the two derivative data sets and cross vectors. This case can also be resolved by calculating phases based on only one derivative and then computing a difference Fourier map (see Chapter 10) for the other. [Pg.210]

Fp(jH) thus AF(jh)P are the Patterson coefficients. Because the differences primarily are due to the heavy atoms, the resulting isomorphous difference Patterson map reveals the location of the heavy atoms. Programs, such as SOLVE (Terwilliger... [Pg.21]

Figure 7.13 (cont.) The Laue maps (i) and (ii) compare very favourably with (iii), the monochromatic map. From Helliwell et al (1989a) with the permission of the American Institute of Physics, (b) (i) Difference Patterson maps based on... [Pg.312]

Except for the iodinated derivative, the major site of substitution of the heavy atoms was found from three-dimensional difference Patterson maps and verified by cross difference-Fourier maps phased on other derivatives. Alternate cycles of phase calculation and refinement of heavy atom parameters were carried out until convergence was reached. Minor sites of substitution of the heavy atoms were located on Fourier maps in which the lack of closure error for the derivative was used as coefficients (11). Table I summarizes the refinement statistics as well. The final figure-of-merit (12) for the 2.5 A data is 0.77. [Pg.35]


See other pages where Difference Patterson maps is mentioned: [Pg.134]    [Pg.634]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.221]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.322 , Pg.323 , Pg.327 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.196 , Pg.208 ]




SEARCH



Difference map

Patterson

Patterson maps

© 2024 chempedia.info