Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Determination of Reaction Network

A reaction network, as a model of a reacting system, mas7 consist of steps involving same ar all of opposing reactions, which may or may not be considered to be at equilibrium, parallel reactions, and series reactions. Some examples ate dted in Section 5.1. [Pg.106]

The determination of a realistic reaction network from experimental kinetics data may be difficult, but it provides a useful model for proper optimization, control, and improvement of a chemical process. One method for obtaining characteristics of the [Pg.106]

In their study of the kinetics of the partial oxidation of methane to HCHO, along with CO, CO and H20 (Example 5-1), Spencer and Pereira (1987) observed the following  [Pg.108]

Construct a reaction network that is consistent with these observations. [Pg.108]

The five points listed above lead to the following corresponding conclusions  [Pg.108]


We first outline various types of complexities with examples, and then describe methods of expressing product distribution. Each of the types is described separately in further detail with emphasis on determining kinetics parameters and on some main features. Finally, some aspects of reaction networks involving combinations of types of complexities and their construction from experimental data are considered. [Pg.87]

Figure 8.2 The cyclic logic of cellular life. The cell, which is equivalent to an autopoietic unit, is an organized bounded system that determines a network of reactions that in turn produces molecular components that assemble into the organized system that determines the reaction network that... and so on. Figure 8.2 The cyclic logic of cellular life. The cell, which is equivalent to an autopoietic unit, is an organized bounded system that determines a network of reactions that in turn produces molecular components that assemble into the organized system that determines the reaction network that... and so on.
Additional (19) experiments should be conducted to quantitatively determine the applicability of reaction networks for the hydrogenation/hydrogenolysis of individual compounds to coal liquids and to establish mechanisms for reaction of other compound types. [Pg.78]

Once the identities of the participants in a reaction have been established, a logical next step toward proposing and testing networks is the determination of reaction orders and, in the case of reactions with many products, of product ranks. The present section examines these preliminaries. [Pg.150]

A great number of studies have been published to deal with relation of transport properties to structural characteristics. Pore network models [12,13,14] are engaged in determination of pore network connectivity that is known to have a crucial influence on the transport properties of a porous material. McGreavy and co-workers [15] developed model based on the equivalent pore network conceptualisation to account for diffusion and reaction processes in catalytic pore structures. Percolation models [16,17] are based on the use of percolation theory to analyse sorption hysteresis also the application of the effective medium approximation (EMA) [18,19,20] is widely used. [Pg.133]

The book is structured to supplement modern texts on kinetics and reaction engineering, not to present an alternative to them. It intentionally concentrates on what is not easily available from other sources. Facets and procedures well covered in standard texts—statistical basis, rates of single-step reactions, experimental reactors, determination of reaction orders, auxiliary experimental techniques (isotopic labeling, spectra, etc.)—are sketched only for ease of reference and to place them in context. Emphasis is on a comprehensive presentation of strategies and streamlined mathematics for network elucidation and modeling suited for industrial practice. [Pg.6]

With the generality of the procedures discussed in this chapter, it seems reasonable to suggest that GA algorithms are useful and promising for the determination of reaction mechanisms and rate coefficients of complex reaction networks. [Pg.122]

Tsuchiya, M. Ross, J. Application of genetic algorithm to chemical kinetics determination of reaction mechanism and rate coefficients for a complex reaction network. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001,105, 4052 058. [Pg.124]

Although this is the standard approach, in our model we propose to allow the chemical reactions to occur not only on the preselected reaction centre but also to affect the atoms in its immediate neigh- bourhood. In practical applications, it is also very convenient to determine not only the atoms of the reaction centre but also those we want to exclude from the chemical processes (e.g. the skeleton-forming atoms). The condition of conservation of all or part of the skeleton, or of a functional group, is very important, e.g., in the synthesis design of biologically active compounds and the generation of reaction networks. Therefore, we introduce the concept of the set of all SPS of the synthon S(A) with respect to the synthon S(X) reduced by the syn-thon S(X). [Pg.166]

The simultaneous determination of a great number of constants is a serious disadvantage of this procedure, since it considerably reduces the reliability of the solution. Experimental results can in some, not too complex cases be described well by means of several different sets of equations or of constants. An example would be the study of Wajc et al. (14) who worked up the data of Germain and Blanchard (15) on the isomerization of cyclohexene to methylcyclopentenes under the assumption of a very simple mechanism, or the simulation of the course of the simplest consecutive catalytic reaction A — B —> C, performed by Thomas et al. (16) (Fig. 1). If one studies the kinetics of the coupled system as a whole, one cannot, as a rule, follow and express quantitatively mutually influencing single reactions. Furthermore, a reaction path which at first sight is less probable and has not been therefore considered in the original reaction network can be easily overlooked. [Pg.4]

The shape of the instantaneous yield curve determines the optimum reactor configuration and flow pattern for a particular reaction network. For cases where the instantaneous yield increases continuously with increasing reactant concentration, the optimum reactor configuration from a product selectivity viewpoint is a... [Pg.322]

The paper first considers the factors affecting intramolecular reaction, the importance of intramolecular reaction in non-linear random polymerisations, and the effects of intramolecular reaction on the gel point. The correlation of gel points through approximate theories of gelation is discussed, and reference is made to the determination of effective functionalities from gel-point data. Results are then presented showing that a close correlation exists between the amount of pre-gel intramolecular reaction that has occurred and the shear modulus of the network formed at complete reaction. Similarly, the Tg of a network is shown to be related to amount of pre-gel intramolecular reaction. In addition, materials formed from bulk reaction systems are compared to illustrate the inherent influences of molar masses, functionalities and chain structures of reactants on network properties. Finally, the non-Gaussian behaviour of networks in compression is discussed. [Pg.377]

The networks studied were prepared from reactions carried out at different initial dilutions. Aliquots of reaction mixtures were transferred to moulds, which were maintained at the reaction temperature under anhydrous conditions, and were allowed to proceed to complete reaction(32). Sol fractions were removed and shear moduli were determined in the dry and equilibrium-swollen states at known temperatures using uniaxial compression or a torsion pendulum at 1Hz. The procedures used have been described in detail elsewhere(26,32). The shear moduli(G) obtained were interpreted according to Gaussian theory(33 34 35) to give values of Mc, the effective molar mass between junction points, consistent with the affine behaviour expected at the small strains used(34,35). [Pg.390]


See other pages where Determination of Reaction Network is mentioned: [Pg.106]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.756]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.756]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.710]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.395]   


SEARCH



Network of Reactions

Reaction determination

Reaction network

Reaction network determination

© 2024 chempedia.info