Detection bond cleavage

Two more recent studies of the nature of the sulfur-carbon bond cleavage in sulfoxide photolyses have been conducted, using ESR5 and CIDNP6 detection methods, respectively. In the latter case there is some evidence for a triplet process being involved in the photocleavage of aryl methyl sulfoxides. 

Because of certain misconceptions with regard to the choice of solvent and the occurrence of sulfur-oxygen bond fission in hydroxylic solvents - , it is important to emphasize that one can greatly reduce the rate of this competing process by the use of weak bases. In systems which can undergo facile C—O as well as S—O bond fission, it is possible to control the type of bond cleavage by choosing the appropriate base . A remarkable illustration of this behavior is found in the ethanolysis of sulfinate 6a. In anhydrous ethanol at 90.0° with acetate ion as the added base, 6a yielded ethyl 2, 6-dimethylbenzenesulfinate plus a trace of sulfone 7a. Under the same conditions but with 2,6-lutidine the reaction was slower and sulfone 7a was the only detectable reaction product . ... 

In 1998, Wakatsuki et al. reported the first anti-Markonikov hydration of 1-alkynes to aldehydes by an Ru(II)/phosphine catalyst. Heating 1-alkynes in the presence of a catalytic amount of [RuCljlCgHs) (phosphine)] phosphine = PPh2(QF5) or P(3-C6H4S03Na)3 in 2-propanol at 60-100°C leads to predominantly anti-Markovnikov addition of water and yields aldehydes with only a small amount of methyl ketones (Eq. 6.47) [95]. They proposed the attack of water on an intermediate ruthenium vinylidene complex. The C-C bond cleavage or decarbonylation is expected to occur as a side reaction together with the main reaction leading to aldehyde formation. Indeed, olefins with one carbon atom less were always detected in the reaction mixtures (Scheme 6-21). 

Prior et al. (44) found that 13-methylprotoberberine (44) gave the C-14—N bond cleavage product 45, and Hanaoka et al. (45) also detected the C-14—N bond cleavage product 47 as a minor product along with 40b and 46 in the reaction of tetrahydroberberine (26) (Scheme 10). Finally, the C-8—N bond cleavage reaction was applied to synthesis of benzocycloheptaquinoline 23 (46) and 6 -methyl-l-benzylisoquinoline 50 via 49 (Scheme 11) (47). The bond cleavage was found to proceed smoothly in ethanol-free chloroform under reflux (46). 

From these data, it can be estimated that chlorphenoxamine (11.24, R = 4-C1, R = Me) should hydrolyze ca. 17 times faster than diphenhydramine. This decreased stability appears sufficient to drive formation of detectable amounts of the benzhydrol metabolite (11.25, R = 4-C1, R = Me) in the stomach of patients dosed with chlorphenoxamine. Indeed, ether bond cleavage to form this and derived metabolites was a major pathway in humans [49], Whether the reaction was entirely nonenzymatic or resulted in part from oxidative O-dealkylation (Chapt. 7 in [50]) remains unknown. 

Example Ethyl loss clearly predominates methyl loss in the El mass spectrum of 2-(l-methylpropyl)-phenol. It proceeds via benzylic bond cleavage, the products of which are detected as the base peak at m/z 121 and m/z 135 (3 %), respectively (Eig. 6.34a). The McLafferty rearrangement does not play a role, as the peak at m/z 122 (8.8 %) is completely due to the isotopic contribution to the peak at m/z 121. From the HR-El spectrum (Fig. 6.34b) the alternative pathway for the formation of a [M-29] peak, i.e., [M-CO-H]", can be excluded, because the measured accurate mass of this singlet peak indicates CgHgO". HR-MS data also reveal that the peak at m/z 107 corresponds to [M-CHs-CO]" and that the one at m/z 103 corresponds to [M-C2H5-H20]. Although perhaps unexpected, the loss of H2O from phenolic fragment ions is not unusual. 

Hudlicky found that C—C bond cleavage of the oxirane occurred readily, while the alternative C—O bond cleavage products were not detected. 

The gas-liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (GLC-MS) analysis of the electrolyzed solution has shown that thiophenol is the only reduction product and the S—S bond cleavage is quantitative. Such a mechanism of bond breaking was confirmed by electrochemical studies. In cyclic voltammograms, anodic and cathodic peak potentials were the same for thiophenol and diphenyl disulfides thus the same species were participating in these processes. Electrode reactions of diphenyl disulfide are given by the following equations [166] ... 

The description of the borderline between stepwise and concerted nucleophilic substitution remains murky in cases where there is no significant stabilization of the transition state for the concerted reaction through the coupling of bond cleavage and formation. The reason is that there are no simple experimental protocols to detect the point at which the energy well for the carbocation intermediate of the stepwise reaction in the upper right hand corner of Figure 2.3 is transformed into... 

The pump-probe-detect arrangements for the femtosecond experiments was similar to those described above. When cyclobutanone was pumped with two photons of a X = 307-nm femtosecond pulse, two consecutive C—CO bond cleavages led to the formation of the trimethylene diradical, detected as an easily ionized transient at 42 amu, with buildup and decay times of 120 20 fs. The decay presumably involves isomerizations to cyclopropane and to propylene— structures not ionized by the probe pulse and thus undetected during the experiment. 

Benzyl Halides The molecular ion peak of benzyl halides is usually detectable. The benzyl (or tro-pylium) ion from loss of the halide (rule 8, Section 2.7) is favored even over /3-bond cleavage of an alkyl substituent. A substituted phenyl ion (a-bond cleavage) is prominent when the ring is polysubstituted. 

In aprotic solvents, the radical anion, RX , for aryl halides has been detected as intermediate. In cyclic voltammetry of aryl halides, though an irreversible two-electron reduction occurs at low scan rate, a reversible one-electron reduction occurs at high scan rate. Thus, it is possible to get the values of the standard potential ( °) for the RX/RX couple and the rate constant (k) for RX -> R (therefore, the lifetime of RX ). In Fig. 8.18, the relation between ° and log k for aryl bromides in DMF is linear with a slope of 0.5 [5If], It is apparent that the lifetime of RX , obtained by 1/k, increases with the positive shift of E0. In contrast, the existence of RX for alkyl monohalides has never been confirmed. With these compounds, it is difficult to say whether the two processes, i.e. electron transfer and bond cleavage, are step-wise or concerted (RX+e -> R +X ). According to Sa-veant [5le], the smaller the bond dissociation energy, the larger the tendency for the concerted mechanism to prevail over the step-wise mechanism. 

---