Derivation shell model

Early interest in heteroatom clusters having alkali metals as the host was academic rather than dictated by precise observations. The main question regarded the extent to which the jellium-derived shell model retained its validity. However, this question was approached on the basis of oversimplified structural models in which the heteroatom (typically a closed-shell alkali-earth such as Mg) was located at the center of the cluster [235, 236]. In this hypothetical scheme, the perturbation of the electronic structure relative to that of the isoelectronic alkali cluster is somewhat trivial for instance, in the Na Mg system the presence of Mg would only alter the sequence of levels of the shell jellium model from Is, Ip, Is, 2s,. .. (appropriate to sodium clusters) to Is, Ip, 2s, Id,. .. (see also [236]). This would lead to the prediction that Na6Mg and NasMg are MNs. 

Flarrison NM, Leslie M (1992) The derivation of shell model potentials for MgCL from ab initio theory. Mol Simul 9 171-174... 

These are derived frum a. lensui force resulting from a coupling between individual pairs of nucleons and from the coupling between spin and orbital angular moments of the individual nucleus, as described by the shell model of the nucleus. 

The microscopic derivation of a boson hamiltonian from a fermion one is basically a two step process. In the first step, one has to select the collective subspace of the shell model space. For the IBM this means truncating the shell model space to the space of collective S-D pairs. In the second step, this space has to be mapped onto the s-d boson space. 

Apart from the demands of the Pauli principle, the motion of electrons described by the wavefunction P° attached to the Hamiltonian H° is independent. This situation is called the independent particle or single-particle picture. Examples of single-particle wavefunctions are the hydrogenic functions (pfr,ms) introduced above, and also wavefunctions from a Hartree-Fock (HF) approach (see Section 7.3). HF wavefunctions follow from a self-consistent procedure, i.e., they are derived from an ab initio calculation without any adjustable parameters. Therefore, they represent the best wavefunctions within the independent particle model. As mentioned above, the description of the Z-electron system by independent particle functions then leads to the shell model. However, if the Coulomb interaction between the electrons is taken more accurately into account (not by a mean-field approach), this simplified picture changes and the electrons are subject to a correlated motion which is not described by the shell model. This correlated motion will be explained for the simplest correlated system, the ground state of helium. 

The energy spectrum of the nucleus according to the semi-empirical shell model [23] appears not at zero ratio, but in two disjoint parts at ratios 0.22 and 0.18. This shift relates to the appearance of the symmetric arrangement at ratio 1.04 rather than 1. An Aufbau procedure based on this result fits the 8-period table derived from the number spiral, but like the observed periodic table, at ratio r, the shell-model result also has hidden symmetry. At ratio zero, the inferred energy spectrum not only fits the 8-period table but also... 

This is undertaken by two procedures first, empirical methods, in which variable parameters are adjusted, generally via a least squares fitting procedure to observed crystal properties. The latter must include the crystal structure (and the procedure of fitting to the structure has normally been achieved by minimizing the calculated forces acting on the atoms at their observed positions in the unit cell). Elastic constants should, where available, be included and dielectric properties are required to parameterize the shell model constants. Phonon dispersion curves provide valuable information on interatomic forces and force constant models (in which the variable parameters are first and second derivatives of the potential) are commonly fitted to lattice dynamical data. This has been less common in the fitting of parameters in potential models, which are onr present concern as they are required for subsequent use in simulations. However, empirically derived potential models should always be tested against phonon dispersion curves when the latter are available. 

On the basis of the shell model of the nuclei, Weisskopf derived the following equations for the probabilities of y-ray emission, given by the decay constants Xe for electric multipole radiation and Am for magnetic multipole radiation ... 

K. de Boer, A. R J. Jansen, and R. A. van Santen, in Zeolites and Related Microporous Materials State of the Art 1994, J. Weitkamp, H. G. Karge, H. Pfeifer, and W. Holderich, Eds., Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 2083-2087. Interatomic Potentials for Zeolites. Derivation of an Ab Initio Shell Model Potential. 

Computations of minimum-energy configurations for some off-centre systems were first carried out on the basis of polarizable rigid-ion models, mainly devoted to KChLi" " [95,167-169]. Van Winsum et al. [170] computed potential wells using a polarizable point-ion model and a simple shell model. Catlow et al. used a shell model with newly derived interionic potentials [171-174]. Hess used a deformation-dipole model with single-ion parameters [175]. At the best of our knowledge, only very limited ab initio calculations (mainly Hartree-Fock or pair potential) have been performed on these systems [176,177]. 

Effective Hamiltonians and effective operators are used to provide a theoretical justification and, when necessary, corrections to the semi-empirical Hamiltonians and operators of many fields. In such applications, Hq may, but does not necessarily, correspond to a well defined model. For example. Freed and co-workers utilize ab initio DPT and QDPT calculations to study some semi-empirical theories of chemical bonding [27-29] and the Slater-Condon parameters of atomic physics [30]. Lindgren and his school employ a special case of DPT to analyze atomic hyperfine interaction model operators [31]. Ellis and Osnes [32] review the extensive body of work on the derivation of the nuclear shell model. Applications to other problems of nuclear physics, to solid state, and to statistical physics are given in reviews by Brandow [33, 34], while... 

The calculation of vibrational frequencies (called phonons) is important to the study of the solid state. Indeed, the calculation of and study of phonons is often given a special name, lattice dynamics. To calculate the vibrational frequencies for a solid one follows a very similar approach to that described earlier for molecules, with the exception that when a shell model is being used then their effect must be incorporated into the mass-weighted matrix of second derivatives (though not directly as they have no mass) ... 

The shell model has been recently extended in the EPE (elastic polarizable environment) embedding scheme derived and applied successfully by Rosch and coworkers [52,53]. In this model, the quantum cluster is surrounded like an onion by several shells, in which the displacement of the ions and their polarizability can be accounted for self-consistently, with decreasing flexibility from the ions adjacent to the quantum cluster down to a static Madelung point charge field in the most distant shell. 

Several attempts have been undertaken to derive such MM force constants for modeling zeolite frameworks [39]. Typical examples are the rigid ion and the shell model which assume that the character of the bonds in the lattice is largely ionic. Within the rigid ion model developed by Jackson and Catlow [40], the potential energy is given by... 

The quality of the potential is the key of a reliable simulation. Historically, the first potential were derived from experimental data and with simple assumptions on the bonding. These potentials are basically of the Bom-Mayer type and polarization effects can be accounted for by a shell model. A new trail to derive potentials is to fit the parameters to the ab initio Bom-Oppenheimer energy surfaces of prototype molecules such as Si (OH)4 and (OH)3SiOSi(OH)3. 

Figure 7 Schematic representation of the empirical method for deriving short-range potential energy function parameters p, are the computed properties for the system, observed properties, and S the sum of squared deviations from target values p and C,y are potential parameters of Eq. [13] K and fCy are shell model parameters, and qi and qj the charges of component species.

---