Density orbital-dependent exchange-correlation

The Pair Density. Orbital-dependent Exchange-correlation Functionals... 

This chapter is devoted to orbital-dependent exchange-correlation (xc) functionals, a concept that has attracted more and more attention during the last ten years. After a few preliminary remarks, which clarify the scope of this review and introduce the basic notation, some motivation will be given why such implicit density functionals are of definite interest, in spite of the fact that one has to cope with additional complications (compared to the standard xc-functionals). The basic idea of orbital-dependent xc-functionals is then illustrated by the simplest and, at the same time, most important functional of this type, the exact exchange of density functional theory (DFT for a review see e.g. [1], or the chapter by J. Perdew and S. Kurth in this volume). 

In summary, the original Thomas-Fermi-Dirac DFT was unable to give binding in molecules. This was corrected by Kohn-Sham, [11] who chose to use an orbital rather than density evaluation of the kinetic energy. By the virial theorem, = —E, so this was a necessity to obtain realistic results for energies. Next, it was shown that the exact exchange requires an orbital-dependent form, too. [47,48] The future seems to demand an orbital-dependent form for the correlation. 

The basic concepts of the one-electron Kohn-Sham theory have been presented and the structure, properties and approximations of the Kohn-Sham exchange-correlation potential have been overviewed. The discussion has been focused on the most recent developments in the theory, such as the construction of from the correlated densities, the methods to obtain total energy and energy differences from the potential, and the orbital dependent approximations to v. The recent achievements in analysis of the atomic shell and molecular bond midpoint structure of have been... 

In this nonvariational approach for the first term represents the potential of the exchange-correlation hole which has long range — 1/r asymptotics. We recognize the previously introduced splitup into the screening and screening response part of Eq. (69). As discussed in the section on the atomic shell structure the correct properties of the atomic sheU structure in v arise from a steplike behavior of the functional derivative of the pair-correlation function. However the WDA pair-correlation function does not exhibit this step structure in atoms and decays too smoothly [94]. A related deficiency is that the intershell contributions to E c are overestimated. Both deficiencies arise from the fact that it is very difficult to represent the atomic shell structure in terms of the smooth function p. Substantial improvement can be obtained however from a WDA scheme dependent on atomic shell densities [92,93]. In this way the overestimated intershell contributions are much reduced. Although this orbital-depen-... 

Z is the nuclear charge, R-r is the distance between the nucleus and the electron, P is the density matrix (equation 16) and (qv Zo) are two-electron integrals (equation 17). f is an exchange/correlation functional, which depends on the electron density and perhaps as well the gradient of the density. Minimizing E with respect to the unknown orbital coefficients yields a set of matrix equations, the Kohn-Sham equations , analogous to the Roothaan-Hall equations (equation 11). 

---