Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dating small-sample

The impact of this new technique, which was called Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS), on the radiocarbon and archaeologist communities, was immediate and revolutionary. The introduction of AMS is indeed recognized by some as the third revolution in radiocarbon dating[22,23] and it has provided the opportunity to date very precious finds by collecting very small samples. The interest in developing the technique of AMS was so evident that, just few years after the measurements cited above, a first dedicated AMS system (based on a tandem accelerator) was designed and built [24] then, the first dedicated... [Pg.462]

The reasons will be clearer after Section 16.4, where AMS radiocarbon sample preparation procedures will be described. Now we would simply like to recall that in preparing graphite pellets for the sputtering source, after a physical chemical cleaning, samples to be dated are usually combusted to obtain C02, which is then converted to graphite by a further step. In this process, the main problem with small samples (a few tens of micrograms) is the possible introduction of contamination. [Pg.480]

During the past several years exciting advances have taken place in radioactive dating techniques—advances which have made it possible to determine unusually small isotope ratios and to determine the radioisotopic composition of individual chemical fractions and particle size fractions of extremely small samples. [Pg.163]

Development of proportional counters to measure C14/C12 ratios in 10 mg carbon samples was undertaken in the Chemistry Department of Brookhaven National Laboratory in 1975 [10] for two reasons (1) at the time, there was no other possibility in sight to accomplish the generally much-needed objective of small-sample C14 measurement, and (2) there was a particular carbon 14 dating problem at the Smithsonian Institution, which would only be solved if very small carbon samples could be handled. The development and testing of the counters has already been reported [9] in the present paper we discuss the application of those counters to the actual dating problem which concerned the Smithsonian Institution, the dating of the "Frobisher iron bloom". [Pg.436]

The levels of NDEIA found in a small sampling of cutting fluids available in the United States ranged from 0. 02-3 percent (41). The NDEIA concentrations shown in Table 2, represent the highest levels of a nitrosamine found in any commercial product investigated to date. [Pg.180]

There are multiple possible reasons for the wide variability in the results of these studies. Some studies only looked at heterozygous samples the population of the patients may cause discrepancies some studies used microsatellite markers to validate the presence of LOH and all studies were performed on small sample sizes. To date the extent of genotype discrepancy for TYMS TSER in colorectal cancer remains unclear. [Pg.98]

Because of the short measurement times of stopped flow, or the small sample volumes associated with continuous flow, a synchrotron source is required for time-resolved SAXS studies of RNA folding. To date studies have been carried out at the APS, at CHESS, and at SSRL. The optics vary by beamline, but all involve intensity enhancement by an insertion device. Monochromatic undulator beam was employed for stopped flow experiments at the 12-ID station at APS (Seifert etal, 2000). Multilayer beam was employed at SSRL beamline 4-2 (Tsuruta et al, 1998), and focused multilayer beam was employed at the CHESS G1 station (Kazimirov et al., 2006). For the continuous flow cell, pink or 3% bandwidth undulator beam was employed at the 8-ID beamline at APS (Sandy et al., 1999). All experiments employed a CCD detector to record a 2D image of the scattering, as illustrated in Fig. 12.1. [Pg.260]

Radiocarbon analysis is possible for dating ancient textiles only where sufficient sample is available. Unfortunately, the uncertainty in dating becomes unacceptably large with small sample size, contamination, and specimens of lesser antiquity (5). Chemical methods of dating are mainly limited to the observation that reducing the sulfur content of wool textiles appears to coincide, in some cases, with embrittlement and/or age (6). The presence of certain kinds of dyes and the manner in which they fade are sometimes used as the evidence of provenance (7). [Pg.266]


See other pages where Dating small-sample is mentioned: [Pg.1]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.1093]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.6]   


SEARCH



Small sample

© 2024 chempedia.info