Surface roughness cylinders

Solid frameworks that have almost cylindrical pores in an hexagonal arrangement can be obtained from different surfactants and at different conditions. In our models, the definition of the cylinders (surface roughness) depends mainly on the simulation temperature (Figure 1). Frameworks obtained from systems that contain immiscible silica/solvent binaries have higher wall density than those where silica/solvent binaries are miscible. 

The modification of the surface force apparatus (see Fig. VI-4) to measure viscosities between crossed mica cylinders has alleviated concerns about surface roughness. In dynamic mode, a slow, small-amplitude periodic oscillation was imposed on one of the cylinders such that the separation x varied by approximately 10% or less. In the limit of low shear rates, a simple equation defines the viscosity as a function of separation... 

For the numerical calculation we usually divided the cell surface (cylinder + end windows) into 14 elements of roughly equal area. Finer surface division yielded essentially the same results. The Na2 density was calculated for a grid of volume points Rj in cylindrical cells with L/d =0.48, 0.90, 1.91, 3.14 and 18.7. The temperature distribution Tj across the cylinder surface was taken from experiment (typically AT = 70 - 80K between the end windows). The calculations were done for P2 = 1.00, 0.75, 0.50, 0.25 and 0.00. In the experiment we measure the density of Na2 in the level v = 4, J = 39 (fluorescence excited by the 465.8 nm argon laser line) instead of the total Na2 density (2.)- In order to calculate [Na2 ]4 39 we have multiplied qj, taken from eq. (1), by the correction factor (6.)... 

The relations for cylinders above are for single cylinders or cylinders oriented such that the flow over them is not affected by the presence of others. Also, they are applicable to smooth surfaces. Surface roughness and ti t free-stream turbulence may affect the drag and heat transfer coefficients significantly. Eq. 7 -37 provides a simpler alternative to Eq. 7-35 for flow over cylinders. However, Eq. 7-35 is more accurate, and thus should be preferred in calculations whenever possible. 

In the book [117], some data are given on the hydrodynamic characteristics of bodies of various shapes these data mainly pertain to the region of precrisis self-similarity. The influence of roughness of the cylinder surface and the turbulence level of the incoming flow on the drag coefficient is discussed in [522]. In [211], the relationship between hydrodynamic flow characteristics in turbulent boundary layers and the longitudinal pressure gradient is studied. Analysis of the transition to turbulence in the wake of circular cylinders is presented in [333]. 

Turning to cross flow over bundles of tubes with surface roughness, some work has been done in the context of heat exchanger development for gas-cooled reactors and conventional shell-and-tube heat exchangers. This work is backed up by extensive studies of single cylinders, such as those with pyramid roughness elements tested in air by Achenbach [82]. Nusselt... 

E. Achenbach, The Effect of Surface Roughness on the Heat Transfer From a Circular Cylinder to the Cross Flow of Air, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer (20) 359-369,1977. 

The SFA setup is shown in Fig. 3.16. The core of the apparatus is a curved confinement cell, defined by two cylindrical glass lenses of radius i 2 cm, facing each other in a crossed cylinders geometry. Two flexible sheets of muscovite mica are glued on the lenses and ai e in direct contact with the liquid to be examined. Mica is used because large sheets ( 1 cm ) of uniform thickness ( 5 tni) can be easily cleaved by hand, exposing the liquid to a very clean and smooth surface (roughness 0.1 nm). 

Other studies of mass transfer for rotating cylinders have appeared in the literature. These include outer rotating cylinders, as well as fanned, wiped, and rough cylinders. With rough surfaces in the turbulent regime, the Stanton number becomes independent of the Reynolds number. 

The German X-ray satellite telescope ROSAT was placed in orbit in 1990. It is equipped with a four-mirror system of parabolic and hyperbolic Zerodur cylinders nested into one another (see Fig. 4.66). The inner surfaces of these reflectors were ground and polished by Carl Zeiss, Germany. The residual surface roughness is less than 0.2 nm RMS. An angular resolution of 3.3 arc seconds was achieved for the telescope due to the precise fabrication and mounting of the mirrors. 

---