Cyclopropane carboxylates, from diazoacetic esters

Diverging results have been reported for the carbenoid reaction between alkyl diazoacetates and silyl enol ethers 49a-c. Whereas Reissig and coworkers 60) observed successful cyclopropanation with methyl diazoacetate/Cu(acac)2, Le Goaller and Pierre, in a note without experimental details u8), reported the isolation of 4-oxo-carboxylic esters for the copper-catalyzed decomposition of ethyl diazoacetate. According to this communication, both cyclopropane and ring-opened y-keto ester are obtained from 49 c but the cyclopropane suffers ring-opening under the reaction conditions. 

The catalytic activity of low-valent ruthenium species in carbene-transfer reactions is only beginning to emerge. The ruthenium(O) cluster RujCCO), catalyzed formation of ethyl 2-butyloxycyclopropane-l-carboxylate from ethyl diazoacetate and butyl vinyl ether (65 °C, excess of alkene, 0.5 mol% of catalyst yield 65%), but seems not to have been further utilized. The ruthenacarborane clusters 6 and 7 as well as the polymeric diacetatotetracarbonyl-diruthenium (8) have catalytic activity comparable to that of rhodium(II) carboxylates for the cyclopropanation of simple alkenes, cycloalkenes, 1,3-dienes, enol ethers, and styrene with diazoacetic esters. Catalyst 8 also proved exceptionally suitable for the cyclopropanation using a-diazo-a-trialkylsilylacetic esters. ... 

Enantioselective carbenoid cyclopropanation of achiral alkenes can be achieved with a chiral diazocarbonyl compound and/or chiral catalyst. In general, very low levels of asymmetric induction are obtained, when a combination of an achiral copper or rhodium catalyst and a chiral diazoacetic ester (e.g. menthyl or bornyl ester ) or a chiral diazoacetamide ° (see Section 1.2.1.2.4.2.6.3.3., Table 14, entry 3) is applied. A notable exception is provided by the cyclopropanation of styrene with [(3/ )-4,4-dimethyl-2-oxotetrahydro-3-furyl] ( )-2-diazo-4-phenylbut-3-enoate to give 5 with several rhodium(II) carboxylate catalysts, asymmetric induction gave de values of 69-97%. ° Ester residues derived from a-hydroxy esters other than ( —)-(7 )-pantolactone are not as equally well suited as chiral auxiliaries for example, catalysis by the corresponding rhodium(II) (S )-lactate provides (lS, 2S )-5 with a de value of 67%. 

Rhodium complexes generated from A-functionalized (S)-proline 3.60 [933, 934, 935] or from methyl 2-pyrrolidone-5-carboxylates 3.61 [936, 937, 938] catalyze the cyclopropanation of alkenes by diazoesters or -ketones. Diastereoisomeric mixtures of Z- and E-cydopropylesters or -ketones are usually formed, but only the Z-esters exhibit an interesting enantioselectivity. However, if intramolecular cyclopropanation of allyl diazoacetates is performed with ligand 3.61, a single isomer is formed with an excellent enantiomeric excess [936,937], The same catalyst also provides satisfactory results in the cyclopropanation of alkynes by menthyl diazoacetate [937, 939] or in the intramolecular insertion of diazoesters into C-H bonds [940]. 

It has been pointed out earlier that the anti/syn ratio of ethyl bicyclo[4.1,0]heptane-7-carboxylate, which arises from cyclohexene and ethyl diazoacetate, in the presence of Cul P(OMe)3 depends on the concentration of the catalyst57). Doyle reported, however, that for most combinations of alkene and catalyst (see Tables 2 and 7) neither concentration of the catalyst (G.5-4.0 mol- %) nor the rate of addition of the diazo ester nor the molar ratio of olefin to diazo ester affected the stereoselectivity. Thus, cyclopropanation of cyclohexene in the presence of copper catalysts seems to be a particular case, and it has been stated that the most appreciable variations of the anti/syn ratio occur in the presence of air, when allylic oxidation of cyclohexene becomes a competing process S9). As the yields for cyclohexene cyclopropanation with copper catalysts [except Cu(OTf)2] are low (Table 2), such variations in stereoselectivity are not very significant in terms of absolute yields anyway. 

Diazo ester/rhodium(II) carboxylate combinations other than EDA/Rh2(OAc)4 have been tested It turned out that the solubility of the rhodium(II) carboxylate greatly influenced the efficiency of cyclopropanation. For the reaction of monoolefins with ethyl diazoacetate, markedly higher yields than with Rh(II) acetate were obtained with the better soluble rhodium(II) butanoate and rhodium(II) pivalate, the latter one being soluble even in pentane. However, only poor yields resulted from the use of rhodium(Il) trifluoroacetate, even though this compound is readily soluble, Rh CCFjCOO), in contrast to the other rhodium(II) carboxylates, is able to form 1 1 complexes with olefins particularly with electron-rich ones thus, competition of olefin and diazo compound for the only available coordination site at the metal atom could be responsible for the reduced catalytic action of Rh2(CF3COO)4 (as will be seen in Section 4.1, this complex is an excellent catalyst for cyclopropanation of aromatic substrates). The diazoester substituent also has some influence on the yields. Increasing yields were obtained in the series methyl ester, ethyl ester, n-butyl... 

---