Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Crystalline solids binding forces

For a substance to dissolve in a liquid, it must be capable of disrupting the solvent structure and permit the bonding of solvent molecules to the solute or its component ions. The forces binding the ions, atoms or molecules in the lattice oppose the tendency of a crystalline solid to enter solution. The solubility of a solid is thus determined by the resultant of these opposing effects. The solubility of a solute in a given solvent is defined as the concentration of that solute in its saturated solution. A saturated solution is one that is in equilibrium with excess solute present. The solution is still referred to as saturated, even... [Pg.59]

During adsorption on a solid, surfactants differ from other adsorbates because of the polar-apolar structure of their molecule. Their adsorption from an aqueous medium on a surface of an distorted crystalline lattice is a result of a reaction equilibrium between binding forces of all species participating at this process. Because of the heterogeneity of such forces acting on the mineral-water interface it is necessary to consider several simultaneous, subsequent reactions. [Pg.126]

We will see that it is the interactions between chains or sheets that is responsible for finite temperature transitions. That is the reason for labeling systems of chains or sheet as quasi-one- or two-dimensional. They exhibit one- or two-dimensional behavior until there occurs a crossover to higher dimensionality. Obviously, crystals do exist and as such must be three-dimensional. Binding forces are intrinsically three-dimensional. Let us then take for granted the existence of the crystalline backbone of organic conductors and concentrate on the electronic properties which are of interest to conduction. It is the strong anisotropy in these which is responsible for the stamp of quasi-one- or quasi-two-dimensional solids. [Pg.27]

More work is required in order to clarify the molecular structure of these fascinating molecular assemblies which seem to be on the borderline between fluid and solid micellar rods. Their formation develops through a certain type of precipitation, also typical for solid micellar fibres. However, the binding forces between the head group molecules (tetraalkylammonium and phenol) are weak, meaning that the fibres are not as stiff and uniform as the crystalline fibres described later. Aqueous suspensions of the described fibres dissolve massive amounts of small hydrocarbon molecules, e.g. 20 mol % of hexane, but the dissolving of hydrophobic porphyrins in them has not yet been achieved. [Pg.103]

The most convenient classification scheme of solids is based on the physical character of the interatomic binding forces in various classes of crystalline materials. According to this classificahon, all solids fall into one of five general categories metallic, covalent, ionic, molecular, and hydrogen-bonded crystals. Some materials may belong to more than one category, thus, the distinction is in many cases not a sharp one. [Pg.92]

We can apply the Lermard-Jones potential to a crystalline solid such as a condensed noble gas in which van der Waals forces are the only bonding mechanism. We replace r,y with pijT as we did for the case of ionic bonding and write the binding energy for a particular configuration. [Pg.52]

The effects of impurities and solid solutions on phonon conductivity in single-phase crystalline ceramics are discussed next. Impurities and solute atoms tend to decrease thermal conductivity. These increase the phonon scattering by way of differences in mass, binding force, and elastic strain field. As the temperature is raised, the scattering increases at low temperatures. At temperatures greater than about half the Debye temperature, it becomes independent of temperature. This is because the average wavelength at these temperatures becomes comparable with or less than the point imperfection. [Pg.325]

Beside the chemical composition, the crystalline structure of the mineral has an important effect on the adsorption ability of its surface. This is due to the fact that lattice bindings are usually not equivalent and space disproportions occur, so that fission surface areas have specific properties. Typical examples are layer lattices of graphite or talc where the main valences proceed in the layer plains whereas these are interconnected with feeble valences. Fission areas of such minerals are hydrophobic. The effect of the structure on adsorption properties of a mineral surface increases with increasing adsorption density and with decreasing force of the adsorption binding of the solid phase5. A crystalline lattice contains structural defects (which include physical and chemical surface imperfections and deficiencies in the volume phase) which can influence the chemical reactivity of a crystal surface. [Pg.93]

The three-dimensional periodic atomic structure is interrupted at the surfaces of crystalline particles. This results, in the case of an ionic crystal lattice, in the formation of unsaturated (ionic) bonds. These unsaturated bonds are capable of binding all kinds of molecules, atoms or ions tightly together this is called chemisorption). Besides chemisorption, physical absorption can also occur at a surface due to weak van der Waals forces. Most solid particles are normally covered with surface oxides or hydroxides, which strongly influence the surface properties of these particles [1217, 2179]. [Pg.354]

A variety of physical properties of several liquids and polymers can be quantitatively described by considering a crystalline arrangement of molecules or other volume elements bound by non-directional forces. In some cases we propose that the intermolec-ular forces in the liquid or solid under question are simply due to van der Waals interactions. In those cases we demonstrate that physical properties such as surface energy cohesive strength compressibility thermal expansion and work of vaporization can be calculated from atomic constants and related to one another by the proposed model. In the case of other liquids and polymers intermolecular forces cannot be described in terms of van der Waals binding alone and other (directional) forces such as dipole-dipole binding must be included. It will be shown that a variety of the calculated properties favorably compare with experimental results. [Pg.121]


See other pages where Crystalline solids binding forces is mentioned: [Pg.304]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.1192]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.2955]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.651]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.691]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.188]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.321 , Pg.322 , Pg.322 , Pg.323 ]




SEARCH



Binding forces

Crystalline forces

© 2024 chempedia.info