Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Cross section values

H2O and D2O mixed sample used in the experiment. For the absorption cross-sections, there are probably some small differences among the three isotopomers in reality. Nevertheless, this estimation should be quite realistic. The estimated branching ratios of the H and D productions from HOD at 157 nm excitation should be 2.46 with about 15% estimated error bar. More accurate measurement on the branching ratio should be possible with the experimentally measured cross-section values for H2O and D2O. [Pg.104]

In order to determine the structural factors maximizing 2PA cross section values, we analyze (8) from Sect. 1.2.1. For all cyanine-like molecules, symmetrical and asymmetrical, several distinct 2PA bands can be measured. First, the less intensive 2PA band is always connected with two-photon excitation into the main absorption band. The character of this 2PA band involves at least two dipole moments, /
    symmetry forbidden for centro-symmetrical molecules, such as squaraines with C, symmetry due to A/t = 0, and only slightly allowed for polymethine dyes with C2V symmetry (A/t is small and oriented nearly perpendicular to /t01). It is important to note that a change in the permanent dipole moment under two-photon excitation into the linear absorption peak, even for asymmetrical D-a-A molecules, typically does not lead to the appearance of a 2PA band. 2PA bands under the main absorption peak are typically observed only for strongly asymmetrical molecules, for example, Styryl 1 [83], whose S0 —> Si transitions are considerably different from the corresponding transitions in symmetrical dyes and represent much broader, less intense, and blue-shifted bands. Thus, for typical cyanine-like molecules, both symmetrical and asymmetrical, with strong and relatively narrow, S (I > S) transitions, we observe... [Pg.140]

    There is some disagreement in the literature as to the value of the (4He, H) elastic scattering cross section. Values differing by almost a factor of two have been reported, as reviewed by Paszti et al. (1986). The cross section is strongly non-Rutherford, but ab initio calculations have been reported that agree well with the trend of experimental data and could be used in simulation calculations (Tirira et al., 1990). The cross section for deuterium analysis has a resonance near a 4He+ energy of 2.15 MeV, which allows enhanced sensitivity. Detailed measurements of this cross section have been reported by Besenbacher et al. (1986). In practice, rather than calculate an experiment s calibration from first principles, calibration standards are usually used hydrogen-implanted silicon standard are the norm. [Pg.209]

    Recently, the potential of 157Gd, which has a much higher cross sectional value than 10B for thermal neutrons has been of interest. Chelating agents, diethylene-triaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) derivatives bearing carborane, were synthesized by the reaction of carboranyl allyl carbonate with DTPA ester. Treatment of... [Pg.105]

    Both the calculated photoelectron ionization and escape depth data of Scofield (11) and Penn (12) are invaluable in estimating surface concentrations from Eq. (8). More recently, experimental cross section data have been reported by Thomas and his group (13) the reported data are relative to the F(ls) peak taken as unity. There are clearly examples where Scofield s calculated cross section values are at variance with the experimentally determined ones the variation is particularly noticeable when we consider outer levels, e.g., for K(2p) there are serious discrepancies, whereas the K(2s) data are acceptable. [Pg.61]

    There have been remarkable advances in synchrotron radiation research and related experimental techniques in the range from the vacuum ultraviolet radiation to soft X-ray, where the most important part of the magnitudes of these cross-section values is observed, as shown below. Therefore, it is also concluded that synchrotron radiation can bridge a wide gap in the energy scale between photochemistry and radiation chemistry. Such a situation of synchrotron radiation as a photon source is summarized in Fig. 1 [5,6]. [Pg.107]

    In most cases, except those in earlier comparative studies between the real-photon method and the dipole-simulation method, the absolute cross-section values obtained by both methods agree with each other [27]. Comparison of obtained cross-section values between the two methods were discussed in detail [27, 2, and references therein] and summarized in conclusion [5]. It should be noted, at least briefly, that it is essentially difficult to accurately obtain the absolute values of photoabsorption cross sections (u) in the dipole-simulation experiments, and it is necessary to use indirect ways in obtaining those values as the application of the TKR sum rule, Eq. (3), to the relative values of the cross sections obtained partly with theoretical assumptions. Moreover, in some cases, in relatively earlier dipole-simulation experiments, particularly of corrosive molecules upon their electron optics with poorer energy resolutions, serious discrepancy from the real-photon experiments was clearly pointed out in the obtained absolute values of photoabsorption cross sections [5,20,25-28]. [Pg.113]

    As for the absolute values of photoionization quantum yields ( ],), a situation of the dipole-simulation experiments in comparison with the real-photon experiments is much more serious and controversial because their absolute scales are determined by the assumption that the photoionization quantum yields should be unity around 20 eV photon energy in addition to the above-mentioned difficulty in obtaining absolute cross-section values in the dipole-simulation experiments. [Pg.113]

    These are the 2PA cross section values as reported in the two original papers. Due to a difference in the definition of. 5 used by those authors, the numerical values should be multiplied by two if the definition of Eq. 2 is used instead. [Pg.22]

    Os-191 is produced by neutron irradiation of isotopically enriched 0s-190 (isotopic composition 0s-190, 97.8 o Os-188, 0.47 o Os-192, 1. 02 o). Irradiations are currrently performed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at a neutron flux of 2.5 x 10 n/cm -s. The routes to the various nuclides produced during irradiation of the 0s-190 target and the neutron cross-section values (2 ) are summarized below (Scheme I). [Pg.52]

    These latter measurements led only to relative cross-section values. However, by comparison with absolute values of velocity-averaged cross sections, they can be put on an absolute scale. To do this, the absolute values obtained in FA measurements were used because here the velocity distribution is exactly known—a Maxwellian distribution /(t>, T) with the temperature of the buffer gas. Denoting the velocity-dependent relative total ionization cross section, obtained in the beam experiment, by oKl(v) and the absolute total ionization rate constant obtained in the FA experiment by R(T), then a normalization k may be determined by... [Pg.427]

    The density and thermal neutron cross-section values in Table 6 pertain to the thermal neutron attenuation gauging process. In this method, advantage is taken of the large thermal neutron scattering cross-section of hydrogen as compared to most other elements. In its simplest form, when a beam of thermal neutrons of intensity IQ traverses a sample of thickness x, the intensity 1 of neutrons measured by a thermal neutron detector will be... [Pg.107]

    B4++ He reaction. This collisional system has been investigated theoretically within the framework of the semiclassical close-coupling formalism using different model potential approaches [2,3] which lead to a discrepancy of about a factor 5 for the double capture cross section values. We have thus performed an alternative study of this system by means of a full molecular expansion method, focusing our attention on the double electron capture process. [Pg.134]

    Table V Typical Cross Section Values for Scattering Processes... Table V Typical Cross Section Values for Scattering Processes...

See other pages where Cross section values is mentioned: [Pg.118]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.3771]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.785]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.68 ]




SEARCH



Cross-sectional areas values

© 2024 chempedia.info