Cross section orientation dependence

The optical absorption cross-section will depend sensitively on the surface from which reflection takes place and the relative orientation of the surface and the electric vector of the incoming radiation. The effect of... 

Quantum mechanical and selected semiclassical and semiempirical methods for the calculation of electron impact ionization cross sections are described and their successes and limitations noted. Experimental methods for the measurement of absolute and relative ionization cross sections are also described in some detail. Four theoretical methods, one quantum mechanical and three semiclassical, have been used to calculate cross sections for the total ionization of the inert gases and small molecules and the results compared with experimental measurements reported in the literature. Two of the theoretical methods, one quantum mechanical and one semiclassical, have been applied to the calculation of orientation-dependent electron impact ionization cross sections and the results compared with recent experiments. 

The EM method has been tested on the inert gases and a range of small molecules and gives good agreement with experimental results in almost all cases.17 This method will be discussed further in relation to the orientation dependence of the electron impact ionization cross section in a later section. The semiempirical polarizability method described below was developed to calculate and to use it with the amax values obtained from this method in order to calculate the energy dependence of the cross section. 

The characteristics of the superexchange or though-bond mechanism for ET have, until recently, remained somewhat obscure. Characteristics primarily describe the distance and orientation dependence of the dynamics of long-range ET, and how this dependency is affected by the nature and composition of the intervening medium. It is this aspect of long-range ET processes that has captured the attention of a broad cross section of the chemical community, partly because a deeper under-... 

In summary, preliminary experiments have demonstrated that the efficiency and outcome of electron ionization is influenced by molecular orientation. That is, the magnitude of the electron impact ionization cross section depends on the spatial orientation of the molecule widi respect to the electron projectile. The ionization efficiency is lowest for electron impact on the negative end of the molecular dipole. In addition, the mass spectrum is orientation-dependent for example, in the ionization of CH3CI the ratio CHjCriCHj depends on the molecular orientation. There are both similarities in and differences between the effect of orientation on electron transfer (as an elementary step in the harpoon mechanism) and electron impact ionization, but there is a substantial effect in both cases. It seems likely that other types of particle interactions, for example, free-radical chemistry and ion-molecule chemistry, may also exhibit a dependence on relative spatial orientation. The information emerging from these studies should contribute one more perspective to our view of particle interactions and eventually to a deeper understanding of complex chemical and biological reaction mechanisms. 

A simple linear plot of the data allows AA to be obtained. The results of a set of experiments (Table 5) are surprising. AA is independent of the size or molecular weight of the protein. Although the cross-sections of the proteins studied range from 1000 to 10,000 A2, AA is nearly constant at 100 to 200 A2. Conclusion . . only a small portion of the protein molecule needs to enter the interface in order for adsorption to then proceed spontaneously (Ref.3), p. 290). It is as if only a small foothold or handhold is required to stabilize the molecule against desorption. Now firmly planted at the interface, the molecule can optimize its interfacial interactions by time-dependent orientation and perhaps conformational changes. The size of the foot is obviously relevant to the exchange discussion in Sect. 4.5. 

---