Courts site claims

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) requires the EPA to "clean up" chemical disposal sites. The cleanup funds are raised through a combination of tort suits against companies that have had some connection with either the disposal site or the chemicals (joint-and-several strict liability) and taxes on petroleum production, hazardous-waste facilities, and chemical products. When judgments go against landowners, trucking firms, container corporations, or other firms less directly connected with the site, the defendants ask their insurance companies to pay these judgments. Courts, then, must decide whether liability insurance contracts cover such claims. 

The Frankfurt Schwurgericht [jury court] admits this frankly in its Reasons for Sentence, cf. Ruter, op. cit. (note 3) A. Ruckerl, op. cit. (note 34), pp. 214f., claims that aside from visits to the sites of the crimes only documentary and material evidence is used. 

The False Claims Act A Primer, http //www.justice.gov/sites/ default/files/civiFlegacy/201 l/04/22/C-FRAUDS FCA Primer.pdf U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). Basic Information, http //www.epa.gov/compliance/basics/nepa.html U.S. District Court, Central District of California, United States of America ex rel Nira Schwartz, Plaintiff v. TRW, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, and Boeing N. America, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants (1996), Plaintiff s Fourth Amended Complaint, Case No. CV 96-3605 CM (RMCx), United States District Court, Central District of California, http //www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/news01/schwartz.pdf U.S. Supreme Court (2006), 547 U.S. 410, Garcetti v. Ceballos. 

---