Material evidence

Brennecka, G. A., Weyer, S., Wadhwa, M. et al. (2009) 238U/235U variations in meteor-itic materials Evidence for curium-247 in the early solar system and implications for Pb-Pb dating (abstr.). Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 44 Supplement, A40. 

Freude et al. (169) carried out a systematic study of the relative amounts of four- and six-coordinated Al in thermally treated zeolite Y, using wide-line and MAS 27A1 NMR at 16 and 70.34 MHz, respectively. Table XV gives the results calculated per one faujasitic supercage ( of the unit cell). It is evident that loss of 27A1 line intensity takes place in treated zeolites in comparison with the parent material, evidently due to extra-framework Al being in an environment of low symmetry. 

Hence, forensic research is exactly what revisionists, starting with Robert Faurisson, have called the search for material evidence. The revisionists demand for such material evidence is entirely consistent with the normal practice of modem law enforcement. Also, as is generally acknowledged, forensic evidence is more conclusive than eyewitness testimony or documentary evidence. 

Although the literature is generally unanimous as to the equipment of the rooms in crematoria IV and V, the information is, to a certain extent, speculative, due to the lack of documents and material evidence. The same is true for the information relating to the farmhouses, on which there are practically no documents available. 

On religion I tend toward deism but consider its proof largely a problem in astrophysics. The existence of a cosmological God who created the universe (as envisaged by deism) is possible, and may eventually be settled, perhaps by forms of material evidence not yet imagined. 

The revisionists also acted as pioneers in terms of expert criticism of testimony and documents as well as in the call for and provision of material evidence. 

Material evidence will refute the testimony of perjured eyewitnesses and the confessions of perpetrators . 

In the debate about the Holocaust one of the main arguments of popular opinion is that there are a great many statements of eyewitnesses to document the National Socialist mass extermination, and that especially the many confessions of perpetrators among the SS are irrefutable proof of the existence of a program of deliberate extermination of the Jews in the Third Reich.2 For this reason, it is claimed, the lack of documentary and material evidence is irrelevant.3... 

First of all, it is incorrect to say that there is no material evidence. The present work is a compendium of such material evidence, which, however, all goes to refute certain aspects of the Holocaust as these are related by witnesses and maintained accordingly by the courts and by academia. The justice system as well as academics of the establishment ignore this material evidence nevertheless, the question arises as to how eyewitness testimony is to be evaluated. 

In orthodox Holocaust studies material evidence is practically nonexistent ... 

It is thus not surprising that Riickerl dispenses with any mention of material evidence and instead declares documentary evidence as the best and most important form of evidence even without any material evidence with respect to the authenticity and correctness of the documents themselves.15... 

Otherwise, only Revisionists have presented material evidence, as other authors will do in the following. 

---