Coulomb interactions limits

The influence of electrical charges on surfaces is very important to their physical chemistry. The Coulombic interaction between charged colloids is responsible for a myriad of behaviors from the formation of opals to the stability of biological cells. Although this is a broad subject involving both practical application and fundamental physics and chemistry, we must limit our discussion to those areas having direct implications for surface science. 

The theory of strong electrolytes due to Debye and Htickel derives the exact limiting laws for low valence electrolytes and introduces the idea that the Coulomb interactions between ions are screened at finite ion concentrations. 

Abstract. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of proteins provide descriptions of atomic motions, which allow to relate observable properties of proteins to microscopic processes. Unfortunately, such MD simulations require an enormous amount of computer time and, therefore, are limited to time scales of nanoseconds. We describe first a fast multiple time step structure adapted multipole method (FA-MUSAMM) to speed up the evaluation of the computationally most demanding Coulomb interactions in solvated protein models, secondly an application of this method aiming at a microscopic understanding of single molecule atomic force microscopy experiments, and, thirdly, a new method to predict slow conformational motions at microsecond time scales. 

N is the number of point charges within the molecule and Sq is the dielectric permittivity of the vacuum. This form is used especially in force fields like AMBER and CHARMM for proteins. As already mentioned, Coulombic 1,4-non-bonded interactions interfere with 1,4-torsional potentials and are therefore scaled (e.g., by 1 1.2 in AMBER). Please be aware that Coulombic interactions, unlike the bonded contributions to the PEF presented above, are not limited to a single molecule. If the system under consideration contains more than one molecule (like a peptide in a box of water), non-bonded interactions have to be calculated between the molecules, too. This principle also holds for the non-bonded van der Waals interactions, which are discussed in Section 7.2.3.6. 

If the coefficients dy vanish, dy = 28y, we recover the exact Debye-Huckel limiting law and its dependence on the power 3/2 of the ionic densities. This non-analytic behavior is the result of the functional integration which introduces a sophisticated coupling between the ideal entropy and the coulomb interaction. In this case the conditions (33) and (34) are verified and the... 

A second difficulty which has only been alluded to—or rather neglected—in the present outline is the validity of the assumption that in and out fields exist. The existence of an asymptotic limit might well be rigorously provable for matrix elements of the form <0 r(o ) l particle), but not for more general situations without explicitly removing the Coulomb interaction between the particles. 

Why—and when—does the Fukui function work The first restriction—already noted in the original 1984 paper—is that the Fukui function predicts favorable interactions between molecules that are far apart. This can be understood because when one uses the perturbation expansion about the separated reagent limit to approximate the interaction energy between reagents, one of the terms that arises is the Coulomb interaction between the Fukui functions of the electron-donor and the electron-acceptor [59,60],... 

In conclusion, the repulsive interactions arise from both a screened coulomb repulsion between nuclei, and from the overlap of closed inner shells. The former interaction can be effectively described by a bare coulomb repulsion multiplied by a screening function. The Moliere function, Eq. (5), with an adjustable screening length provides an adequate representation for most situations. The latter interaction is well described by an exponential decay of the form of a Bom-Mayer function. Furthermore, due to the spherical nature of the closed atomic orbitals and the coulomb interaction, the repulsive forces can often be well described by pair-additive potentials. Both interactions may be combined either by using functions which reduce to each interaction in the correct limits, or by splining the two forms at an appropriate interatomic distance . 

For 1, de Broglie s wavelength is small enough compared to the classical collision radius b so that a wave packet can be constructed which, approximately, follows the classical Coulomb trajectory [3]. The opposite limit, where the Sommerfeld parameter Zie hv<, denotes the case of weak Coulomb interaction where the Born approximation may be expected to be valid. 

In order to develop such a broader view and a general qualitative understanding of charge transport, it is beneficial to consider the general one-electron Hamiltonian shown in (1). In this approach we follow the outline taken in [45]. This Hamiltonian assumes a low carrier density, and effects due to electron correlation or coulomb interaction are not considered. Despite these limitations, the following general one-electron Hamiltonian is useful to illustrate different limiting cases ... 

In fact, whether to interpret properties in the atomic or in the band limit depends upon the competition between these two quantities the bandwidth W, describing itinerant behaviour, and the Coulombic interaction U, describing atomic behaviour. 

---