Coordinate transformations, effect

However, it is not proper to apply the regression analysis in the coordinates AH versus AS or AS versus AG , nor to draw lines in these coordinates. The reasons are the same as in Sec. IV.B., and the problem can likewise be treated as a coordinate transformation. Let us denote rcH as the correlation coefficient in the original (statistically correct) coordinates AH versus AG , in which sq and sh are the standard deviations of the two variables from their averages. After transformation to the coordinates TAS versus AG or AH versus TAS , the new correlation coefficients ros and rsH. respectively, are given by the following equations. (The constant T is without effect on the correlation coefficient.)... 

The dynamical history of stress-relaxation in a star-linear blend begins life in just the same way as a star-star blend,because when t r gp the linear chain relaxation is dominated by pathlength fluctuation and behaves as a two-arm star with M =Mii /2. So very early Rouse fluctuation (Eq. 25) crosses over to activated fluctuation in self-consistent potentials. These are calculated via the coordinate transformation used in the star-star case above. For example, the effective potential for the star component in this regime is... 

Figure 3-13 (a) The shape of a "perfectly" shaped quartz crystal, and (b) the effective "shape of quartz crystal with respect to oxygen diffusion (after coordinate transformation using Equation 3-70d). The length (thickness) to diameter ratio is about 2 1 in (a) and 1 5 in (b). 

As an example, let us work out a representation of the group C2v, which group consists of the operations , C2, Cartesian coordinate system, and let av be the xz plane and <7 be the yz plane. The matrices representing the transformations effected on a general point can easily be seen to be as follows ... 

In effect, the equation has been derived under the assumption of infinite nuclear mass. This is accurate enough for electron scattering, but for proton and atom scattering a coordinate transformation is needed, the details of which are given in Mott and Massey.26... 

The LVC model further allows one to introduce coordinate transformations by which a set of relevant effective, or collective modes are extracted that act as generalized reaction coordinates for the dynamics. As shown in Refs. [54, 55,72], neg = nei(nei + l)/2 such coordinates can be defined for an electronic nei-state system, in such a way that the short time dynamics is completely described in terms of these effective coordinates. Thus, three effective modes are introduced for an electronic two-level system, six effective modes for a three-level system etc., for an arbitrary number of phonon modes that couple to the electronic subsystem according to the LVC Hamiltonian Eq. (7). In order to capture the dynamics on longer time scales, chains of such effective modes can be introduced [50,51,73]. These transformations, which are briefly summarized below, will be shown to yield a unique perspective on the excited-state dynamics of the extended systems under study. 

To this end, an additional orthogonal coordinate transformation is introduced, by which the bilinear couplings occurring in Eq. (13) are transformed to a band-diagonal form that only allows a coupling to the (three) nearest neighbors. By concatenating the effective-mode construction described in the previous section with this additional transformation in the residual-mode subspace,... 

Implementing the reactor temperature controller merits some discussion. While Tr is not a true slow variable (it has a two-time-scale behavior, as illustrated in Figure 6.11(a)), as we argued above, the fast transient of the process (and, inherently, of Tr) is stable. We are thus interested in controlling the slow component of the reactor temperature, which in effect governs the behavior of the entire process. To this end, we conveniently chose the coordinate transformation (6.61)—(6.62) so that the energy balance in Equations (6.63) is written in terms of the reactor temperature Tr, rather than in terms of the total enthalpy of the process. 

We now consider the overall effect of these coordinate transformations on the total Hamiltonian (3.251). We have already shown in chapter 2 that... 

We dealt with the effects of applied static fields on the electronic Hamiltonian in section 3.7. In this section we first give the relevant terms for the nuclear Zeeman and Stark Hamiltonians and then perform the same coordinate transformations that proved to be convenient for the field-free molecular Hamiltonian. 

In this chapter size effects in encounter and reaction dynamics are evaluated using a stochastic approach. In Section IIA a Hamiltonian formulation of the Fokker-Planck equation (FPE) is develojjed, the form of which is invariant to coordinate transformations. Theories of encounter dynamics have historically concentrated on the case of hard spheres. However, the treatment presented in this chapter is for the more realistic case in which the particles interact via a central potential K(/ ), and it will be shown that for sufficiently strong attractive forces, this actually leads to a simplification of the encounter problem and many useful formulas can be derived. These reduce to those for hard spheres, such as Eqs. (1.1) and (1.2), when appropriate limits are taken. A procedure is presented in Section IIB by which coordinates such as the center of mass and the orientational degrees of freedom, which are often characterized by thermal distributions, can be eliminated. In the case of two particles the problem is reduced to relative motion on the one-dimensional coordinate R, but with an effective potential (1 ) given by K(l ) — 2fcTln R. For sufficiently attractive K(/ ), a transition state appears in (/ X this feature that is exploited throughout the work presented. The steady-state encounter rate, defined by the flux of particles across this transition state, is evaluated in Section IIC. 

The effect of applying two sequential coordinate transformations on a point, r, can be represented by the product of the two matrices, each one of which represents the respective transformation. We need to take care, however, that the matrices are multiplied in the correct order because, as we saw above, matrix multiplication is often non-commutative. For example, in order to find the matrix representing an anticlockwise rotation by 0, followed by a reflection in the y-axis, we need to find the product CA (and not AC as we might initially assume ). 

The total virial for an open system v(Q), is of course, origin independent since it equals —27 ( 2). This is not the case, however, for its expression in terms of the sum of its basin v ( 2) and surface v,v( 2) contributions, whose values, according to their definitions in Equations (8) and (9), are dependent up a choice of origin. Consider a coordinate transformation denoted by r = r + 5R caused by a shift SR in the origin. This has the effect of changing the basin and surface virials by the same absolute amount, equal to the virial of the Ehrenfest force as given in Equation (23),... 

Here the ijk coordinate system represents the laboratory reference frame the primed coordinate system i j k corresponds to coordinates in the molecular system. The quantities T--, are the matrices describing the coordinate transformation between the molecular and laboratory systems. In this relationship, we have neglected local-field effects and expressed the in a form equivalent to summing the molecular response over all the molecules in a unit surface area (with surface density (For simplicity, we have omitted any contribution to not attributable to the dipolar response of the molecules. In many cases, however, it is important to measure and account for the background nonlinear response not arising from the dipolar contributions from the molecules of interest.) In equation B 1.5.44, we allow for a distribution of molecular orientations and have denoted by () the corresponding ensemble average ... 

One should note that for the physical coordinate system boundary conditions must be applied at z = h(x,y), while for the terrain-following systems application is at C, = 0 and z = 0 (Figure 25.6). In the following discussion we will use the simple terrain-following coordinate transformation (25.31), which effectively flattens out the terrain, leading to the flat modeling domain shown in Figure 25.6d. 

For our further development we use with good effect a special coordinate system. The equation y = determines a coordinate transformation... 

One useful graphical assessment of two different microarray samples is the M-A plot. In this plot, M, the difference in log-transformed intensity values of gene i on chips j and k [log(x, ) - log(x,t )] is plotted against A, the average ([log(Xyi) -I- log(x t()]/2). This is effectively a coordinate transformation such that the line of equality (x, = x,t) becomes M = 0. Such a transformation has the benefit of making deviations from the median as well as differences in expression variance as a function of expression intensity more clear. An example of such a transformation is shown in Figure 3.6. 

This method can be shown to have effective order four, meaning that there is a change of variables Xh which can be used to transform the Takahashi-Imada method into one of order four using the processing technique of Sect. 2.4.5. The potential energy modification has been specifically chosen to annihilate terms in the local error expansion (after coordinate transformation). 

Since Hh is assumed to be constant along the numerical solution, the coordinate transformations have the result of giving an effective order of four for the energy. It turns out that the Takahashi-Imada method is, more generally, an effective 4th order scheme, i.e. for arbitrary quantities, not just the energy [166],... 

---