Controller, second-integral interacting

With the second level of tool interaction control), we introduce the notion of loose process integration. Loose process integration corresponds to the most often addressed case of commercial tools that restrict their external interactions to those of service invocation and notifications for tool events. Such tools provide service invocation (Al) and feedback information (A2) APIs (Table 3.1), but they provide no means for extending their user interface with new command elements (A3), or increasing their process sensitivity by highlight product shapes or command elements and returning feedback concerning their selection (A4, A5 and A6). 

If the MO energy differences - El are large enough and/or the resonance integrals P , (for appropriate nonzero coefficients c and c,J are small, then the second term in Eq. [7] is small, and the interaction is determined mainly by the first (electrostatic) term (charge controlled interaction). In this case, Eq. [7] can be simplified... 

Representation of human-automation integration requires functions of attentional control and concurrent task performance. Distributed attention and attention switching refer to an operator s ability to perform multiple tasks simultaneously. In many cases, a second task can be added to the performance of a primary task with little or no impact to the performance of the first task. In other cases, the performance of two tasks simultaneously has a disastrous interaction. Such context-and order-sensitive effects are determined in the scheduling and agenda management function provided in the MIDAS model. Attention capture functions are represented through a preattentive filter mechtmism that responds to physical characteristics of environmental stimuli (e.g., color, blinking, auditory characteristics). 

Second, students could easily integrate paper interaction with the learning activities. They spread out and browsed the handouts on their desks, wrote answers with pens and submitted results on their paper. Participant P2 preferred the paper interface because of the high degree of control over the handouts, noting Sometimes, we can... 

---