Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polar solvents contact approximation

In the inverted region the recombination layer is first extended and then shifted from the contact as AGr increases (Fig. 3.5). The bell-shaped Wr t) can be approximated by the rectangular model of the layer (3.55), whose inner border is r, = / A and external border is r, R I A (Fig. 3.6). In highly polar solvents... [Pg.190]

Using the contact approximation and polar solvents (rc = 0), one can find for the irreversible ionization [38] ... [Pg.205]

Figure 3.41. The diffusional dependence of the recombination efficiency Z in the contact approximation (dotted line) at starting distance ro — 1.124 a and the same for the remote recombination in a normal (solid line) and inverted (dashed line) Marcus region, in highly polar solvents. The horizontal dashed-dotted line represents the exponential model result, Z — z — const. (From Ref. 152.)... Figure 3.41. The diffusional dependence of the recombination efficiency Z in the contact approximation (dotted line) at starting distance ro — 1.124 a and the same for the remote recombination in a normal (solid line) and inverted (dashed line) Marcus region, in highly polar solvents. The horizontal dashed-dotted line represents the exponential model result, Z — z — const. (From Ref. 152.)...
In view of the approximations inherent in the derivation of the reaction field theory, it is not surprising that some instances are known in which a non-linear relationship exists between the solvent shift and dielectric constant in polar solvents. As pointed out by Buckingham, the reaction field model is only valid for a solute that reacts in no way with the solvent or with other solute molecules but simply presents a continuum of certain dielectric properties. Protons are normally on the surface of the molecule and are therefore exposed to direct contact with the surrounding molecules, so that the Onsager model is a poor approximation of the actual reaction field acting on a molecule. [Pg.92]

For a given monomer, the stereocontrol depends primarily on the polarity of the medium. If polymerization is carried out in highly polar solvents, those that encourage dissociation, the result will be polymers with relatively high proportions of syndiotactic triads (see Table 18-6). However, the proportion of heterotactic triads is likewise very significant. Changing to apolar solvents, the proportion of isotactic triads Xa is found to increase, while the proportion of heterotactic triads remains approximately constant. It is obviously impossible to achieve holotactic polymers by ionic polymerizations with free ions. The influence of the polarity of the solvent shows that the increase in the proportion of isotactic triads probably corresponds to the increase in the concentration of contact ion pairs or ion associates. [Pg.657]

The solvent accessible surface area (SASA) is often used as a descriptor in quantitative structure-activity relationships (Connolly 1996). For a wide variety of molecules there is an approximate linear relation between solvation free energies and SASA. However, theoretical considerations indicate that the SASA model is incapable of accurately describing non-polar solvation phenomena at length-scales comparable to the size of a water molecule. It is more useful at large length-scales when more extended hydrophobic surfaces are in contact with the solvent. [Pg.1109]

A set of thirty different descriptors [Stanton and Jurs, 1990] which combine shape and electronic information to characterize molecules and therefore encode features responsible for polar interactions between molecules. The molecule representation used for deriving CPSA descriptors views molecule atoms as hard spheres defined by the - van der Waals radius. The - solvent-accessible surface area SASA is used as the molecular surface area it is calculated using a sphere with a radius of 1.5 A to approximate the contact surface formed when a water molecule interacts with the considered molecule. Moreover, the contact surface where polar interactions can take place is characterized by a specific electronic distribution obtained by mapping atomic partial charges on the solvent-accessible surface. [Pg.52]

The LIP has a meaning of Galvani potential, i.e., its exact value cannot be measured by definition [1]. This results in the need of various approximations from both experimental and modeling sides. Generally, both the solvent and the electrolyte can be different in two contacting liquid phases (1) and (2), and it is assumed [2] that the quantity of the LIP can be presented by two additive contributions induced by heterogeneous distribution of ions and polar molecules, respectively ... [Pg.33]


See other pages where Polar solvents contact approximation is mentioned: [Pg.208]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.2946]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.2644]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.2644]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.785]    [Pg.902]    [Pg.792]    [Pg.190]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.185 ]




SEARCH



Approximation polarization

Polar solvents

Polarity, solvent

Polarity/polarization solvent

Polarization solvent

Solvent polar solvents

© 2024 chempedia.info