Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Conductors correction factors

To this point, the theory has been developed assuming that the medium is a conductor (e = oo), rather than a polarizable solvent of finite dielectric e. Fortunately, (2.88) can be extended to solvents by the introduction of a correction factor, f(e) ... [Pg.31]

The first of the two recent PCM versions quoted above, namely that we shall call COSMO-PCM, has been implemented by Barone and Cossi [32]. It formally derives from the computational model proposed by Klamt and Schiiiirman [33], which consists in defining apparent charges g by first exploiting a liquid conductor model (i.e. e = oo), and then introducing a correction factor multiplying each ASC in order to make the obtained formulas coherent with the isotropic dielectric model. [Pg.238]

This correction factor is plotted in Figure 2.1. In a perfectly smooth surface (no roughness), there is no increase in conductor attenuation as a result of roughness. If the roughness is 50% of the skin depth, there is a conductor attenuation increase of 1.21, or 21% increase in conductor loss over a perfectly smooth conductor, due to roughness. If the roughness equals the skin depth, the increase in conductor attenuation is 1.61, or 61%. [Pg.65]

There are appropriate correction factors for the etching rates of each combination. Between conductors, patterns, thickness, and etching, solutions should be introduced for the photo masks, based on the actual trials, especially for the multiple parallel fine lines very common to high density flexible circuits. Usually, there are remarkable differences in etching factors between middle conductors and edge conductors, as shown in Fig. 63.13. [Pg.1516]

Portable tools are used extensively on sites and maintaining them and their connecting cables in good repair is a critical factor of their safe use. Electrocution occurs when the body acts as the conductor from a power line and earth, often because the earth connection on the tool has broken. All portable tools must be securely earthed or be of double insulated construction and the plug on the lead must be correctly fused. Unfortunately it is frequently difficult to keep track of every item, so reliance has to be placed on the person using them. [Pg.659]

In general, it is best to avoid power factor problems altogether by purchasing or upgrading to equipment and systems that promote good power factor, and by correctly sizing all equipment, including conductors and transformers. [Pg.64]

Finally, to simplify the electrostatic algorithm some methods start with a dielectric permittivity e = oo corresponding to a conductor like solvent and then correct the result either by the ratio 2(e-l)/(2e-i-l)of the Onsager factor of the actual dielectric permittivity of the solvent to the limiting value when e = oo, or by the ratio of the Born factors ( -l)/e. Itis noteworthy that the difference may not be negligible for low dielectric constants. This approximation has first been introduced in the COSMO model (Klamt and Schuurmann 1993). A version of the PCM model, known as C-PCM (Barone and Cossi 1998) uses the same approximation to evaluate the electrostatic solvation term. [Pg.565]

Sulfonated poly(arylene ether ketone)s have been shown to possess lower methanol permeability than Nafion by a factor of 3-4 (corrected for membrane thickness) [42], Incorporation of inorganic proton conductors, such as heteropolyacids, can reduce methanol permeability further to a factor of more than 20 (corrected for thickness) [42] compared to plain Nafion 117, while maintaining almost the same proton conductivity as Nafion 117 at room temperature (fully hydrated). Some results are shown in Table 2. [Pg.20]

Let us proceed to the one-electron corrections (28.59) when the electron-hypervibrational problem reduces to the electron-vibrational one. Since conductors have no gap, the one-particle derivation is more sensitive and we have to take into account also the second part of (28.59) which does not depend on the electron distribution defined by occupation factors as the first part but is exactly valid in the present form only for the vibrational vacuum. [Pg.534]


See other pages where Conductors correction factors is mentioned: [Pg.713]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.1107]    [Pg.1183]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.538]   


SEARCH



Correction factors

© 2024 chempedia.info