Conduction explicit finite difference

I or example, in the case of transient one-dimensional heat conduction in a plane wall with specified surface temperatures, the explicit finite difference equations for all the nodes (which are interior nodes) are obtained from Eq. 5-47. The coefficient of TjJ, in the T expression is 1 - 2t, which is independent of the node number / , and thus the stability criterion for all nodes in this case is 1 — 2t s 0 or... 

C 1 he explicit finite difference formulation of a general interior node for transient two-dimensional heat conduction is given by... 

S-73 Consider transient heat conduction in a plane wall whose left surface (node 0) i.s maintained at. >0°C while the tiglil surface (node 6) is subjeeted to a solar heal flux of 600 W/m. The wall is initially at a uniform temperature of 50°C. Express the explicit finite difference fomiulalion of the boundary nodes 0 and 6 for the case of no heal generation. Also, obtain die finite difference formulaiioti for the total amount of heat transfer at the left boundary during the first three lime steps. 

Consider transient heat conduction in a plane wall with variable heal generation and constant thermal conductivity. The nodal network of (he medium consists of nodes 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 with a uniform nodal spacing of A.r. The wall is initially at a specified temperaWre. The temperature at the right bound ary (node 4) is specified. Using the energy balance approach, obtain the explicit finite difference formulation of the boundary... 

Starling with an energy balance on a volume element, obtain the two-dimensional transient explicit finite difference equation for a general interior node in rectangular coordinates for T x, y, t) for the case of constant thermal conductivity and no heal generation. 

In the finite-difference appntach, the partial differential equation for the conduction of heat in solids is replaced by a set of algebraic equations of temperature differences between discrete points in the slab. Actually, the wall is divided into a number of individual layers, and for each, the energy conserva-tk>n equation is applied. This leads to a set of linear equations, which are explicitly or implicitly solved. This approach allows the calculation of the time evolution of temperatures in the wall, surface temperatures, and heat fluxes. The temporal and spatial resolution can be selected individually, although the computation time increa.ses linearly for high resolutions. The method easily can be expanded to the two- and three-dimensional cases by dividing the wall into individual elements rather than layers. 

The finite difference formulation of transieiii heat conduction problems is based on an energy balance that also accounts for tire variation of the energy content of the volume element during a time interval At. The heat transfer and heat generation terms are expressed at the previous time. step fin the explicit method, and at the new time step i I 1 in the implicit method. For a general node III, the finite difference formulations are expressed as... 

So far, we have considered the explicit scheme of finite-difference formulations and its stability criterion for an illustrative example. The use of the explicit scheme becomes somewhat cumbersome when a rather small Ax is selected to eliminate the truncation error for accuracy. The Ai allowed then by the stability criterion may be so small that an enormous amount of calculations may be required. We now intend to eliminate this difficulty by giving different forms to the equations resulting from the finite-difference formulation. Let us take the case of one-dimensional conduction in unsteady problems, for which we obtained the difference equation given by Eq. (4.50). Consider a formulation of the problem in terms of backward rather than forward differences in time. That is, decrease the time from f +i = (n + l)Ai to tn = nAt. Thus we obtain... 

First, physical properties of the polymer/gas system as well as the initial and boundary concentrations were assigned. Then, the radiative conductivity was calculated. Subsequently, the Finite Difference Method with an explicit scheme was applied to solve the governing diffusion equation. After the mole fraction of the blowing agent in each cell was obtained, thermal conductivity of the gas mixture in each cell was understood. Once thermal resistance of each cell was acquired, thermal conductivity of the foam board would be determined. 

Nonideally, physicists are still wrestling with real conductors as opposed to infinite-s ideal metals. The real problem is the n = 0 term in the summation for the van der Waals free energy. Its character differs from those at finite frequency and must therefore be trusted only in specifically validated cases. For real conductors, properties of the form —e2/ o)(o)me + iy)] are expressed explicitly in terms of conductivity a as a term... 

---