Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Concentration dependence ternary solution

The kinetics of these reactions in liquid solutions characteristic of the stratosphere, such as concentrated H2S04-H20 or ternary solutions with HN03, depend on temperature as expected and in some cases at least, on acidity as well. For example, Donaldson et al. (1997) have shown that the second-order rate constant for the... [Pg.691]

The first PGSE investigation of a rubber-based ternary solution was described by Ferguson and von Meerwall31), who measured diffusion of C6F6(19F NMR) and n-paraffin (n-dodecane or n-hexatriacontane 1H NMR) in a commercial polybutadiene as function of both concentrations. They showed that both concentration dependences in the ternary region can be derived from the measured diffusivity of each diluent i = 1, 2 in binary solution in the rubber. To do this it was necessary to extend the Fujita-Doolittle expression, as follows ... [Pg.22]

Although there has not been much theoretical work other than a quantitative study by Hynes et al [58], there are some computer simulation studies of the mass dependence of diffusion which provide valuable insight to this problem (see Refs. 96-105). Alder et al. [96, 97] have studied the mass dependence of a solute diffusion at an infinite solute dilution in binary isotopic hard-sphere mixtures. The mass effect and its influence on the concentration dependence of the self-diffusion coefficient in a binary isotopic Lennard-Jones mixture up to solute-solvent mass ratio 5 was studied by Ebbsjo et al. [98]. Later on, Bearman and Jolly [99, 100] studied the mass dependence of diffusion in binary mixtures by varying the solute-solvent mass ratio from 1 to 16, and recently Kerl and Willeke [101] have reported a study for binary and ternary isotopic mixtures. Also, by varying the size of the tagged molecule the mass dependence of diffusion for a binary Lennard-Jones mixture has been studied by Ould-Kaddour and Barrat by performing MD simulations [102]. There have also been some experimental studies of mass diffusion [106-109]. [Pg.149]

We thus see that, in accordance with (302) and (303), the shape of A5 in(x) as a function of concmtration depends on the numerical value and sign of the various constants responsible for the specific interactions. By accumulating measurements of As as a function of concentration of the solutions, it is thus possible to investigate in the light of this theory the various types of molecular correlations and to ascertain the conc itra-tions at which binary, or ternary, or more highly multiple correlations predominate. The graphs of Figure 19 show the various possible types of... [Pg.385]

An analysis of the cosolvent concentration dependence of the osmotic second virial coefficient (OSVC) in water—protein—cosolvent mixtures is developed. The Kirkwood—Buff fluctuation theory for ternary mixtures is used as the main theoretical tool. On its basis, the OSVC is expressed in terms of the thermodynamic properties of infinitely dilute (with respect to the protein) water—protein—cosolvent mixtures. These properties can be divided into two groups (1) those of infinitely dilute protein solutions (such as the partial molar volume of a protein at infinite dilution and the derivatives of the protein activity coefficient with respect to the protein and water molar fractions) and (2) those of the protein-free water—cosolvent mixture (such as its concentrations, the isothermal compressibility, the partial molar volumes, and the derivative of the water activity coefficient with respect to the water molar fraction). Expressions are derived for the OSVC of ideal mixtures and for a mixture in which only the binary mixed solvent is ideal. The latter expression contains three contributions (1) one due to the protein—solvent interactions which is connected to the preferential binding parameter, (2) another one due to protein/protein interactions (B p ), and (3) a third one representing an ideal mixture contribution The cosolvent composition dependencies of these three contributions... [Pg.309]

Viscosity studies of ionic polysoaps in pure aqueous solution usually suffer from the polyelectrolyte behaviour experienced at low concentrations [46, 49, 52, 75, 78, 98, 99, 126, 130,193, 219, 229, 338]. Indeed, as the dissociation of the ionic groups varies with the concentration, meaningful concentration dependent studies become difficult. The problem was frequently overcome by addition of salt (Fig. 19). But ternary systems are created, making the systems even more complex, and many ionic polysoaps tend to precipitate in brine [50, 54, 299], These problems can be avoided by zwitterionic polysoaps, facilitating the interpretation of concentration dependence [78]. [Pg.25]

Figure 8. Concentration dependence of components of a ternary solution on temperature (top plot) anthracene, (center plot) 2-methylanthra-cene, (bottom plot) benzanthracene. Figure 8. Concentration dependence of components of a ternary solution on temperature (top plot) anthracene, (center plot) 2-methylanthra-cene, (bottom plot) benzanthracene.
The treatment of diffusion given in this section is valid only for the analysis of solutions in the limit of inifinite dilution. We return to the question of diffusion in several sections of this book. In Section 9.2 a simple theory of diffusion in electrolyte solutions is discussed. In Section 10.6 the coupling between diffusion and heat conduction is treated in some detail. In section 11.6 a microscopic description of diffusion is given. Finally in Sections 13.5 and 13.6 a detailed treatment of diffusion in binary and ternary solutions of nonelectrolytes and electrolytes is presented. The concentration-dependence of the diffusion coefficient is considered in Section 13.5. These sections are based on the theory of nonequilibrium thermodynamics and are thus relegated to the chapter on this subject. Particular attention should be given to these sections by any reader interested in the analysis of diffusion. [Pg.62]

Since concentrations xj, X2, X3 represent equilibrium values (i.e. concentrations in the bulk phase after adsorption takes place) it is impossible to prepare the original samples of ternary solutions in such a way that the X2/X3 ratio stays constant without prior knowledge of the adsorption isotherm. This is the reason that adsorption isotherms seem to depend on the solid/liquid ratio in the system. An increase in the amount of the solid phase increases the total amount of surfactants adsorbed, which results in a change of X2/X3 ratio and a shift of the experimental point on the adsorption isotherm surface. Obviously, this effect is more pronounced in systems with large differences in individual surfactant adsorption characteristics. [Pg.681]

Nonelectrolyte G mcxlels only account for the short-range interaction among non-charged molecules (—One widely used G model is the Non-Random-Two-Liquid (NRTL) theory developed in 1968. To extend this to electrolyte solutions, it was combined with either the DH or the MSA theory to explicitly account for the Coulomb forces among the ions. Examples for electrolyte models are the electrolyte NRTL (eNRTL) [4] or the Pitzer model [5] which both include the Debye-Hiickel theory. Nasirzadeh et al. [6] used a MSA-NRTL model [7] (combination of NRTL with MSA) as well as an extended Pitzer model of Archer [8] which are excellent models for the description of activity coefficients in electrolyte solutions. Examples for electrolyte G models which were applied to solutions with more than one solvent or more than one solute are a modified Pitzer approach by Ye et al. [9] or the MSA-NRTL by Papaiconomou et al. [7]. However, both groups applied ternary mixture parameters to correlate activity coefficients. Salimi et al. [10] defined concentration-dependent and salt-dependent ion parameters which allows for correlations only but not for predictions or extrapolations. [Pg.771]

An attempt to describe the concentration dependence of the DOS at the Fermi level in NbC Ni (x = 1.0, 0.75, 0.25, 0.12, and 0) was undertaken by Nikiforov and Kolpachev (1988) and Kolpachev and Nikiforov (1988). They used a multiple scattering method in the local coherent potential approximation. Variations in the solid solution composition caused the greatest changes in the nonmetal p-symmetry states and in the part of the d-band located close to the Fermi level. At the same time, comparison of the DOS of the calculated clusters and photoelectron spectra of Nb ternary alloys obtained by Ichara and Watanabe (1981) shows that the calculations only roughly reproduce the peculiarities of the NbC jNi c valence spectrum the energy separation of the p-d- and d-bands is considerably overestimated and there are some additional peaks in the DOS which are not seen in the experimental spectrum. [Pg.138]

E. D. von Meerwall, E. J. Amis, and J. D. Ferry. Self-diffusion in solutions of polystyrene in tetrahydrofuran Comparison of concentration dependences of the diffusion coefficient of polymer, solvent, and a ternary probe component. Macromolecules, 18(1985), 260-266. [Pg.113]

Our present understanding of the thermodynamics of HNO3/H2SO4/ H2O ternary solutions under stratospheric conditions still depends to a high degree on predictions made by thermodynamic models, which allow to calculate the properties of non-ideal, i.e. highly concentrated, electrolytic solutions. The interactions between the species in such solutions are expressed in terms of activity coefficients (/). For example, the solubility of a species HX which dissolves and dissociates in solution can be calculated according to... [Pg.148]

A few experimental values of a are shown in Table 21.5-1. The values of a are frequently small, especially in dilute solution. They are largest for solutes of very different molecular weights or for highly nonideal solutions. They are more nearly constant for near-ideal solutions and are concentration-dependent in nonideal liquid mixtures. In short, they behave much like the ternary diffusion coefficients discussed in Chapter 7. They are usually of minor practical importance, even though they can be used to effect surprisingly good separations. [Pg.616]

Where there are multi-layers of solvent, the most polar is the solvent that interacts directly with the silica surface and, consequently, constitutes part of the first layer the second solvent covering the remainder of the surface. Depending on the concentration of the polar solvent, the next layer may be a second layer of the same polar solvent as in the case of ethyl acetate. If, however, the quantity of polar solvent is limited, then the second layer might consist of the less polar component of the solvent mixture. If the mobile phase consists of a ternary mixture of solvents, then the nature of the surface and the solute interactions with the surface can become very complex indeed. In general, the stronger the forces between the solute and the stationary phase itself, the more likely it is to interact by displacement even to the extent of displacing both layers of solvent (one of the alternative processes that is not depicted in Figure 11). Solutes that exhibit weaker forces with the stationary phase are more likely to interact with the surface by sorption. [Pg.101]

Usually, activities of enzymes (hydrogenases included) are investigated in solutions with water as the solvent. However, enhancement of enzyme activity is sometimes described for non-aqueous or water-limiting surroundings, particular for hydrophobic (or oily) substrates. Ternary phase systems such as water-in-oil microemulsions are useful tools for investigations in this field. Microemulsions are prepared by dispersion of small amounts of water and surfactant in organic solvents. In these systems, small droplets of water (l-50nm in diameter) are surrounded by a monolayer of surfactant molecules (Fig. 9.15). The water pool inside the so-called reverse micelle represents a combination of properties of aqueous and non-aqueous environments. Enzymes entrapped inside reverse micelles depend in their catalytic activity on the size of the micelle, i.e. the water content of the system (at constant surfactant concentrations). [Pg.216]


See other pages where Concentration dependence ternary solution is mentioned: [Pg.869]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.2814]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.457]   


SEARCH



Concentrated dependence

Concentrated solutions

Concentrating solutions

Concentration dependence

Concentration dependency

Solute concentration

Solute concentration dependence

Solute-dependent

Solution concentration dependence

Solutions solution concentrations

Ternary solutions

© 2024 chempedia.info