Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Concentrated solutions, adsorption from

The surface excess amount, or Gibbs adsorption (see Section 6.2.3), of a component i, that is, /if, is defined as the excess of the quantity of this component actually present in the system, in excess of that present in an ideal reference system of the same volume as the real system, and in which the bulk concentrations in the two phases stay uniform up to the GDS. Nevertheless, the discussion of this topic is difficult on the other hand for the purposes of this book, it is enough to describe the practical methodology, in which the amount of solute adsorbed from the liquid phase is calculated by subtracting the remaining concentration after adsorption from the concentration at the beginning of the adsorption process. [Pg.310]

Adsorption isotherms of poorly purified solutes on heterogeneous or impure adsorbents often pass through a maximum in adsorption. Although such phenomena are possible in adsorption from concentrated solutions or from the gas phase, it is difficult to justify on theoretical grounds the existence of these phenomena in adsorption from dilute solutions of surfactants. They often disappear upon purification of the adsorbent and the solute and are believed to be due to the presence of impurities (Kitchener, 1965). [Pg.46]

When adsorption takes place at the surface of a highly porous solid adsorbent, the surface excess can be readily measured, e.g. by measuring the increase in the adsorbent weight in the case of adsorption from vapor, or by following the decrease in the adsorbate concentration during adsorption from solutions. Studies of the adsorption dependence on vapor pressure (or solution concentration) reveal T(p) (or T(c)) adsorption isotherms. In both cases the two-dimensional pressure isotherm can be established from the Gibbs equation (see Chapter II, 2, and Chapter VII, 4). Therefore, it is as a rule possible to establish the dependence between the two of three variables present in the Gibbs equation the surface tension isotherm, a(c), for mobile interfaces and soluble surfactants, the two-dimensional pressure, tt(c), isotherm for insoluble... [Pg.82]

Adsorption from solution, in comparison, is relatively simple to do experimentally, as no volume changes are involved and modem analytical techniques can be easily adapted to measure concentration changes in solutions as complex as you wish. But, do not be deceived by this apparent simplicity. Competitive adsorption may occur between the solvent and the solute. Adsorption from solution may be further complicated because the solute may change chemically, or its concentration may change in the solution. Thus, concentration of an acidic molecule is a function of the pH of the solution and it is to be noted that both the non-dissociated molecule and an associated ion may be adsorbed. [Pg.383]

Precipitation of soiid particies, which are poorly wetted by the liquid, can adsorb at the interface and cause foam stability. Precipitated solid particles may also reduce the surfactant concentration by adsorption from bulk solution. This would reduce the effectiveness of the Gibbs - Maragoni effect... [Pg.27]

The discussion so far has been confined to systems in which the solute species are dilute, so that adsorption was not accompanied by any significant change in the activity of the solvent. In the case of adsorption from binary liquid mixtures, where the complete range of concentration, from pure liquid A to pure liquid B, is available, a more elaborate analysis is needed. The terms solute and solvent are no longer meaningful, but it is nonetheless convenient to cast the equations around one of the components, arbitrarily designated here as component 2. [Pg.406]

Equation XI-27 shows that F can be viewed as related to the difference between the individual adsorption isotherms of components 1 and 2. Figure XI-9 [140] shows the composite isotherms resulting from various combinations of individual ones. Note in particular Fig. XI-9a, which shows that even in the absence of adsorption of component 1, that of component 2 must go through a maximum (due to the N[ factor in Eq. XI-27), and that in all other cases the apparent adsorption of component 2 will be negative in concentrated solution. [Pg.407]

Dye adsorption from solution may be used to estimate the surface area of a powdered solid. Suppose that if 3.0 g of a bone charcoal is equilibrated with 100 ml of initially 10 Af methylene blue, the final dye concentration is 0.3 x 10 Af, while if 6.0 g of bone charcoal had been used, the final concentration would have been 0.1 x Qr M. Assuming that the dye adsorption obeys the Langmuir equation, calculate the specific surface area of the bone charcoal in square meters per gram. Assume that the molecular area of methylene blue is 197 A. ... [Pg.420]

The chief uses of chromatographic adsorption include (i) resolution of mixtures into their components (Li) purification of substances (including technical products from their contaminants) (iii) determination of the homogeneity of chemical substances (iv) comparison of substances suspected of being identical (v) concentration of materials from dilute solutions (e.g., from a natural source) (vi) quantita tive separation of one or more constituents from a complex mixture and (vii) identi-1 ig- II, 16, 3. gcajjQij and control of technical products. For further details, the student is referred to specialised works on the subject. ... [Pg.158]

AB diblock copolymers in the presence of a selective surface can form an adsorbed layer, which is a planar form of aggregation or self-assembly. This is very useful in the manipulation of the surface properties of solid surfaces, especially those that are employed in liquid media. Several situations have been studied both theoretically and experimentally, among them the case of a selective surface but a nonselective solvent [75] which results in swelling of both the anchor and the buoy layers. However, we concentrate on the situation most closely related to the micelle conditions just discussed, namely, adsorption from a selective solvent. Our theoretical discussion is adapted and abbreviated from that of Marques et al. [76], who considered many features not discussed here. They began their analysis from the grand canonical free energy of a block copolymer layer in equilibrium with a reservoir containing soluble block copolymer at chemical potential peK. They also considered the possible effects of micellization in solution on the adsorption process [61]. We assume in this presentation that the anchor layer is in a solvent-free, melt state above Tg. The anchor layer is assumed to be thin and smooth, with a sharp interface between it and the solvent swollen buoy layer. [Pg.50]

According to experimental data,208,209 the SNIFTIR technique can be used to probe the electrical properties of the electrical double layer even in more concentrated solutions where cyclic voltammetry (cv), impedance, chronocoulometry, and other techniques are not applicable. Iwasita and Xia210 have used FTIR reflection-adsorption spectra to identify the potential at which the orientation of water molecules changes from hydrogen down to oxygen down. [Pg.41]

Sulfiir-anchored SAMs and thin films, mostly from organosulfiir precursors, have been discussed at length by a number of authors [10, 181]. SAMs of organosulfiir compounds (thiols, disulfides, sulfides) form on gold substrates by spontaneous adsorption from either the liquid or the vapor phase. A number of experimental factors can affect the formation and structure of SAMs such as choice of solvent, temperature, concentration, immersion time, purity of adsorbate, oxygen concentration in solution, cleanliness, and structure of the adsorbate. Interestingly, the... [Pg.338]

Solution of equations (1.26) and (1.27) for above two limiting cases differing in the value of the surface concentration of adsorption particles brings about different dependencies of the value of the surface band bending as a function of parameters of the absorbate-adsorbent system. Thus, in case of adsorption of acceptors we obtain from (1.26) that... [Pg.31]

Fig. 20.1. Correlation between the air/water partition coefficient, Kaw, determined from measurements of the surface pressure as a function of drug concentration (Gibbs adsorption isotherm) in buffer solution (50 mM Tris/HCI, containing 114 mM NaCI) at pH 8.0 and the inverse of the Michaelis Menten constant, Km obtained from phosphate release... Fig. 20.1. Correlation between the air/water partition coefficient, Kaw, determined from measurements of the surface pressure as a function of drug concentration (Gibbs adsorption isotherm) in buffer solution (50 mM Tris/HCI, containing 114 mM NaCI) at pH 8.0 and the inverse of the Michaelis Menten constant, Km obtained from phosphate release...
These excess quantities are independent of the thickness chosen for the interface as long as it incorporates the region where the concentrations are different from those in the bulk that is, it does not matter if one chooses too thick a region (see Problem 1). We cannot refer the surface concentrations of the metal particles M, Mz+, and e to the solution. Nevertheless we will drop the asterisk in their surface concentrations to simplify the writing we will eliminate these quantities later. We can now rewrite the Gibbs adsorption equation in the form ... [Pg.219]

In view of the fundamental importance of the Gibbs-Thomson formula, and the magnitude of the discrepancies between the figures calculated from it and the experimental results, it is of obvious interest to inquire to What causes the deviations may be due. The first point to be noticed is that the complex substances which exhibit them most markedly form, at least at higher concentrations, colloidal and not true solutions. It is, therefore, very probable that they may form gelatinous or semi-solid skins on the adsorbent surface, in which the concentration may be very great. There is a considerable amount of evidence to support this view. Thus Lewis finds that, if the thickness of the surface layer be taken as equal to the radius of molecular attraction, say 2 X io 7 cms., and the concentration calculated from the observed adsorption, it is found, for instance, for methyl orange, to be about 39%, whereas the solubility of the substance is only about 078%. The surface layer, therefore, cannot possibly consist of a more concentrated solution of the dye, which is the only case that can be dealt with theoretically, but must be formed of a semi-solid deposit. [Pg.47]

Figure 10.2 Schematic isotherm for the simplest cases of chemical adsorption from solution onto a solid substrate. The amount of adsorbate available to adsorb is best gauged by the concentration c... Figure 10.2 Schematic isotherm for the simplest cases of chemical adsorption from solution onto a solid substrate. The amount of adsorbate available to adsorb is best gauged by the concentration c...

See other pages where Concentrated solutions, adsorption from is mentioned: [Pg.189]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.813]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.691]    [Pg.699]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.343]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.582 , Pg.583 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption concentrated solutions

Adsorption concentrations

Adsorption from solutions

Adsorption solution

Concentrated solutions

Concentrating solutions

Solute concentration

Solutions solution concentrations

© 2024 chempedia.info