Computers word-processing languages

In a similar manner to the program for optimization of a packed column, the program written in table (2) is in a very simple form that can be translated easily to the basic language used by other computers. The output will be sent directly to the monitor screen in the output window. However, by replacing the PRINT statements by LPRINT statements the output will be sent to a printer. If the clipboard is defined a file, and the result print, statements are replaced by write statements, then the results can be sent to the clipboard and pasted into word processing text. An example of an output from the program Is shown in Table (3),... 

Said most prosaically, we view quantum generators as representations of the word distributions of quantmn process languages. Despite similarities, this is a rather different emphasis than that used before. The first mention of quantum automata as an empirical description of physical properties was made by Albert in 1983 [13]. Albert s results were subsequently criticized by Peres for using an inadequate notion of measurement [14]. In a computation-theoretic context,... 

As was said in the introduction (Section 2.1), chemical structures are the universal and the most natural language of chemists, but not for computers. Computers woi k with bits packed into words or bytes, and they perceive neither atoms noi bonds. On the other hand, human beings do not cope with bits very well. Instead of thinking in terms of 0 and 1, chemists try to build models of the world of molecules. The models ai e conceptually quite simple 2D plots of molecular sti uctures or projections of 3D structures onto a plane. The problem is how to transfer these models to computers and how to make computers understand them. This communication must somehow be handled by widely understood input and output processes. The chemists way of thinking about structures must be translated into computers internal, machine representation through one or more intermediate steps or representations (sec figure 2-23, The input/output processes defined... 

For technical reasons we have used an endmarker at the end of the input. It allows to check if every important parts of the sentence are already read, i.e., the main structure of the sentence is checked since some other optional parts may be left on the tape, the process is finished by seeing the endmarker (having the remained optional parts translucent). It is an open problem whether each language accepted by DFAwtl can be accepted by a DFAwtl such a way that all the input letters (including the optional parts) of each accepted input word are erased during the computation. 

---