Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Composite materials governing equations

Dow and Rosen s results are plotted in another form, composite material strain at buckling versus fiber-volume fraction, in Figure 3-62. These results are Equation (3.137) for two values of the ratio of fiber Young s moduius to matrix shear modulus (Ef/Gm) at a matrix Poisson s ratio of. 25. As in the previous form of Dow and Rosen s results, the shear mode governs the composite material behavior for a wide range of fiber-volume fractions. Moreover, note that a factor of 2 change in the ratio Ef/G causes a factor of 2 change in the maximum composite material compressive strain. Thus, the importance of the matrix shear modulus reduction due to inelastic deformation is quite evident. [Pg.182]

The rate of material exiting the composite is governed by steady-state permeation across the outermost water layers the initial burst (second term in equation 10) is the amount of permeant in the two outer oil layers. [Pg.40]

For exothermic reactions in mixed flow (or close to mixed flow) an interesting situation may develop in that more than one reactor composition may satisfy the governing material and energy balance equations. This means that we may not know which conversion level to expect, van Heerden (1953, 1958) was the first to treat this problem. Let us examine it. [Pg.226]

Formulation of the mathematical model here adopts the usual assumptions of equimolar overflow, constant relative volatility, total condenser, and partial reboiler. Binary variables denote the existence of trays in the column, and their sum is the number of trays N. Continuous variables represent the liquid flow rates Li and compositions xj, vapor flow rates Vi and compositions yi, the reflux Ri and vapor boilup VBi, and the column diameter Di. The equations governing the model include material and component balances around each tray, thermodynamic relations between vapor and liquid phase compositions, and the column diameter calculation based on vapor flow rate. Additional logical constraints ensure that reflux and vapor boilup enter only on one tray and that the trays are arranged sequentially (so trays cannot be skipped). Also included are the product specifications. Under the assumptions made in this example, neither the temperature nor the pressure is an explicit variable, although they could easily be included if energy balances are required. A minimum and maximum number of trays can also be imposed on the problem. [Pg.6]


See other pages where Composite materials governing equations is mentioned: [Pg.149]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.3199]    [Pg.1165]    [Pg.1132]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.2373]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.1013]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.1009]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.256]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.75 , Pg.76 , Pg.77 , Pg.78 , Pg.79 , Pg.80 , Pg.81 ]




SEARCH



Composition Equation

Governing equations

Material equations

© 2024 chempedia.info