Complementary dissimilarity

The renaturation rate of DNA is an excellent indicator of the sequence complexity of DNA. For example, bacteriophage T4 DNA contains about 2 X 10 nucleotide pairs, whereas Escherichia coli DNA possesses 4.64 X 10 . E. coli DNA is considerably more complex in that it encodes more information. Expressed another way, for any given amount of DNA (in grams), the sequences represented in an E. coli sample are more heterogeneous, that is, more dissimilar from one another, than those in an equal weight of phage T4 DNA. Therefore, it will take the E. coli DNA strands longer to find their complementary partners and reanneal. This situation can be analyzed quantitatively. 

Equation (2.2.24) means homogeneous generation of particles A and B with the rate p (per unit time and volume), whereas (2.2.25) comes from the statistical independence of sources of a different-kind particles. Physical analog of this model is accumulation of the complementary Frenkel radiation defects in solids. Note that depending on the irradiation type and chemical nature of solids (metal or insulator), dissimilar Frenkel defects could be either spatially correlated in the so-called geminate pairs (see Chapter 3) or distributed at random. We will focus our attention on the latter case. 

In PCR product, the untreated sample can be considered as a strand-specific intra-assay negative control. Electrochemical signals upon thermal denaturation undoubtedly designated the presence of a complementary sequence. Genosensors showed a different behaviour as underlined by the signal ratio between the denaturated and non-denaturated sample that highlighted the dissimilar efficiency of each probe. 

Similarity and distance between objects are complementary concepts for which there is no single formal definition. In practice, distance as a measure of dissimilarity is a much more clearly defined quantity and is more extensively used in cluster analysis. 

CA is commonly used to investigate and display compound similarity, however, it can also be used for descriptor selection from a larger set. CA relies on the fact that similarity and dissimilarity among two points in multi-dimensional space can be quantified by calculating their inter-point distance. The most common measure being the Euclidean distance. Both hierarchical and non-hierarchical approaches exist. CA is often used complementary to PCA. 

This new quantum similarity-dissimilarity index formulation does not necessarily have to coincide with the original similarity-dissimilarity indices (Equations 17.4 and 17.5). Therefore, both matrices (the original metric of the QOS DF Z and the metric of the DQOS tag set elements Z ) might provide complementary geometrical and topological information about the associated QO point cloud. A discussion on the nature of the QS metric matrices has been recently published. More information on this QS feature can be obtained. 

---