Comparison of Calculated and Experimental Results

Frontal Analysis, Displacement and the Equilibrium-Dispersive Model 

Frontal Analysis Displacement and the Eqtdlibrium-Dispersive Model 

The different isotherm models give quite different calculated profiles. The 

Neuberger (Ed.), Symposium on Protein Structure, lUPAC, Paris, 1957, Meuthen, London, 1958, p. 100. 

Varga-Puchony, G. Szepesi, M. Gazdag, J. Chromatogr. 386 (1987) 353. 

---

Figure 9.21. Comparison of calculational and experimental results for plate impact test.

Detailed comparison of calculated and experimental results for the variation of the escape probability with the external field in Lar, LKr, and LXe has been made by Mozumder (1995a, b, 1996) using the data on LET, W value, mobility, and so forth. Experiments are with MeV electrons or beta-emitters having minimum LET in these liquids. The external field generally does not have any preferred direction relative to the track axis. Mozumder (1995a) argues that in such... 

Table 3. b. Summury of Comparison of Calculated and Experimental Results... 

Figure 13.18 Comparison of calculated and experimental results ( ) experimental results from Figure 13.17 and (—) calculated results for a 16 A volume shell.

Fig. 5. Comparison of calculated and experimental results for 1.4 torr. Experimental Calculated — [after Denaro et al. ]...

The carbon di oxi de/lemon oil P-x behavior shown in Figures 4, 5, and 6 is typical of binary carbon dioxide hydrocarbon systems, such as those containing heptane (Im and Kurata, VO, decane (Kulkarni et al., 1 2), or benzene (Gupta et al., 1 3). Our lemon oil samples contained in excess of 64 mole % limonene so we modeled our data as a reduced binary of limonene and carbon dioxide. The Peng-Robinson (6) equation was used, with critical temperatures, critical pressures, and acentric factors obtained from Daubert and Danner (J 4), and Reid et al. (J 5). For carbon dioxide, u> - 0.225 for limonene, u - 0.327, Tc = 656.4 K, Pc = 2.75 MPa. It was necessary to vary the interaction parameter with temperature in order to correlate the data satisfactorily. The values of d 1 2 are 0.1135 at 303 K, 0.1129 at 308 K, and 0.1013 at 313 K. Comparisons of calculated and experimental results are given in Figures 4, 5, and 6. 

Figure 1. Comparison of calculated and experimental results of (A) conversions ofMA and EGDA, and (B) fraction of pendant acrylate group (fj j) during ATRcP ofMA and EGDA with [MA],/[EGDA](/[EBrP] (/ [CuBr]o/[CuBr2]f[PMDETA]o = 50/10/1/0.45/0.05/0.5, [MA]o= 6.0M, in DMF at 60 °C. The experimental conversions ofMA and EGDA were determined by GC measurement. (Adapted with permission from reference 18. Copyright 2007American Chemical Society.)...

FIGURE4.5 Binding of UlA and U1 RNA. (A) The native complex, with side chains of K20, K22, K23, and K50 of UlA shown. (B) Representative configurations in the transient complex. (C) Comparison of calculated and experimental results for the effects of mutating four lysine residues on the binding rate. Parts (A) and (B) are adapted from Qin and Zhou [71], The left panel in (C) is taken from Qin and Zhou [18], and the right panel in (C) is taken from Qin and Zhou [71], but with the additional result label Schreiber calculated according to Selzer et al. [103],... 

On the figures there is comparison of calculated and experimental results for phase B. There is compared the mass flow rate in GDCS drain line and its effect on the increase of the liquid level in reactor and the decrease of water mass in GDCS. In spite of different calculated and measured GDCS drain line mass flow the differencies between corresponding water masses in reactor and GDCS are very small. 

TABLE X.2. Comparison of Calculated and Experimental Results on Detachment of Spherical Glass Particles from a Steel Surface with a Class 4 Finish, with a Free-Stream Velocity of 6.2 m/sec. 

Comparison of calculations and experimental results for the bond lengths R, binding or tenn energies D, T, and vibrational frequencies cOj of the AS states arising ftom the 4f oVo SC of CeO ... 

Reaction rates can be estimated using several computational techniques, all of which are derived from the basic equation describing neutron transport. This Transport Equation is very complex and contains constants (cross sections) which are experimentally measured. The transport equation must be approximated to obtain numerical solutions both because of the complex nature of the equation and because of the nonanalytic form of the cross sections. Each of these approximate methods is well suited for some applications, but none is economically applicable to all situations. Thus, the criticality analyst must select the best method for the problem at hand and he inust understand the approximations used and be able to estimate their validity. Most often this selection of the best inethod depends upon extensive comparisons of calculated and experimental results, the topic of another paper in this session. The choice also depends on economic considerations, this is, the tradeoff between accuracy and computing dollars. 

---