Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Comparison between static measurements estimates

The evaporation path shown in Fig. 10 is very close to a straight line owing to the low vapor pressure of phenethyl alcohol. At first the structural changes during evaporation will be described followed by a comparison between the measured vapor pressures and those estimated from the static ones. [Pg.56]

From equations 13 16, the standard error for each measurement as a function of the elution time can be obtained. Additional propagation of these errors through the Integration across the chromatogram results in estimates of the errors associated with the SEC calculation of the average polymer properties. Therefore, it enables reliable statistical comparisons between SEC estimates and static measurements... [Pg.225]

A number of studies have attempted to characterize ionic liquids through their dielectric constant, and all have observed inconsistencies between the measured dielectric constant and the solvation properties of the liquid. Recent experiments making use of dielectric reflectance spectroscopy [214] indicate dielectric constants in the range of 10-15 for a series of imidazolium-based ILs, substantially lower than those for molecular solvents observed to possess comparable polarities as estimated by solvatochromism. Weingartner [215] has recently published a series of static dielectric constants obtained from dielectric reflectance spectroscopy, and compared them with those of common molecular liquids. The analysis includes comparison with the Kamlet-Taft ji parameter for the liquids from Eq. (11) we have prepared a plot of n versus dielectric constant in Fig. 6. The relationship between n and e for molecular liquids... [Pg.112]

Figure 7.5 shows a comparison of the static and cyclic crack velocities for the alumina/SiC composite, similar to that illustrated in Fig. 7.2 for alumina. As seen for monolithic alumina, the ceramic composite undergoes slower rates of fracture when (1) fluctuations are introduced in the tensile loads and (2) the cyclic frequency is raised. The differences between static and cyclic crack growth rates are maximum at the lower Kmax levels. As in the case of unreinforced alumina, crack velocities estimated for cyclic loads on the basis of sustained load crack growth data (assuming identical failure mechanisms) are higher than those measured experimentally. [Pg.238]

Carbon monoxide chemisorption was used to estimate the surface area of metallic iron after reduction. The quantity of CO chemisorbed was determined [6J by taking the difference between the volumes adsorbed in two isotherms at 195 K where there had been an intervening evacuation for at least 30 min to remove the physical adsorption. Whilst aware of its arbitrariness, we have followed earlier workers [6,10,11] in assuming a stoichiometry of Fe CO = 2.1 to estimate and compare the surface areas of metallic iron in our catalysts. As a second index for this comparison we used reactive N2O adsorption, N20(g) N2(g) + O(ads), the method widely applied for supported copper [12]. However, in view of the greater reactivity of iron, measurements were made at ambient temperature and p = 20 Torr, using a static system. [Pg.259]


See other pages where Comparison between static measurements estimates is mentioned: [Pg.232]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.985]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.228 , Pg.232 ]




SEARCH



Comparison between

Comparison between static measurements

Static measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info