Comparative analysis of all solvents

Polymer/additive analysis then usually proceeds by separation of polymer and additives (cf. Scheme 2.12) using one out of many solvent extraction techniques (cf. Chapter 3). After extraction the residue is pressed into a thin film to verify that all extractables have been removed. UV spectroscopy is used for verification of the presence of components with a chromophoric moiety (phenolic antioxidants and/or UV absorbers) and IR spectroscopy to verify the absence of IR bands extraneous to the polymer. The XRF results before and after extraction are compared, especially when the elemental analysis does not comply with the preliminary indications of the nature of the additive package. This may occur for example in PA6/PA6.6 blends where... 

The activity of the solvent often can be obtained by an experimental technique known as the isopiestic method [5]. With this method we compare solutions of two different nonvolatile solutes for one of which, the reference solution, the activity of the solvent has been determined previously with high precision. If both solutions are placed in an evacuated container, solvent will evaporate from the solution with higher vapor pressure and condense into the solution with lower vapor pressure until equilibrium is attained. The solute concentration for each solution then is determined by analysis. Once the molality of the reference solution is known, the activity of the solvent in the reference solution can be read from records of previous experiments with reference solutions. As the standard state of the solvent is the same for all solutes, the activity of the solvent is the same in both solutions at equUibrium. Once the activity of the solvent is known as a function of m2 for the new solution, the activity of the new solute can be calculated by the methods discussed previously in this section. 

Attempts have been made to identify primitive motions from measurements of mechanical and dielectric relaxation (89) and to model the short time end of the relaxation spectrum (90). Methods have been developed recently for calculating the complete dynamical behavior of chains with idealized local structure (91,92). An apparent internal chain viscosity has been observed at high frequencies in dilute polymer solutions which is proportional to solvent viscosity (93) and which presumably appears when the external driving frequency is comparable to the frequency of the primitive rotations (94,95). The beginnings of an analysis of dynamics in the rotational isomeric model have been made (96). However, no general solution applicable for all frequency ranges has been found for chains with realistic local structure. 

Prior to phospholipid analysis, it is imperative to extract the lipids from their matrix and free them of any nonlipid contaminants. Phospholipids are generally contained within the lipid fraction, which may be recovered by the traditional Bligh and Dyer or Folch extraction procedure (9,22). In any phospholipid extraction method it is recommended to include a rather polar solvent in addition to a solvent with high solubility for lipids. The former is needed to break down lipid-protein complexes that prevent the extraction of the lipids in the organic phase. Traditionally, mixtures of chloroform and methanol (especially 2 1, v/v) have been recommended. These are washed with water or aqueous saline to remove nonlipid contaminants. Comparing the recovery of phospholipids, Shaikh found that the neutral phospholipids PC, PE, SPH as well as DPG were nearly quantitatively extracted by all solvent systems studied (Table 1), although Bligh and Dyer, in which the lower phase was removed only once, was somewhat worse (23). 

---