Commutators defined

As illustrated earlier, setting the generator equal to e-p defines the atomic force and the variational principle leads to the integral atomic force law, or the equation of motion for an atom in a molecule. Finally, it was shown that, when F = — sr-p, the commutator defines the electronic kinetic energy and virial for an atom, and the variational principle yields the relationship between these quantities, the atomic virial theorem. These three relationships—the equation of continuity, the equation of motion, and the virial theorem—form the basis for the understanding of the mechanics of an atom in a molecule. 

This is known as a commutation relation and in algebra, of course, the result would be zero. Classical physics would also predict that the result is zero, but in quantum mechanics it isn t. We can think about this in the following manner. Classical physics is a macroscopic approximation to quantum physics in the limit of large dimensions, quantum physics goes over to classical physics. The commutator, defined as xp - px, is small, but... 

We may write any even power of multiple commutators defined above as... 

Since the electronic eigenvalues (the adiabatic PESs) are uniquely defined at each point in configuration space we have m(0) = m(P), and therefore Eq. (32) implies the following commutation relation ... 

Asymmetry in a similarity measure is the result of asymmetrical weighing of a dissimilarity component - multiplication is commutative by definition, difference is not. By weighing a and h, one obtains asymmetric similarity measures, including the Tversky similarity measure c j aa 4- fih + c), where a and fi are user-defined constants. The Tversky measure can be regarded as a generalization of the Tanimoto and Dice similarity measures like them, it does not consider the absence matches d. A particular case is c(a + c), which measures the number of common features relative to all the features present in A, and gives zero weight to h. 

Although the components of L do not commute with one another, they can be shown to commute with the operator L defined by... 

For a more complicated [B] matrix that has, say, n columns whereas [A] has m rows (remember [A] must have p columns and [B] must have p rows), the [C] matrix will have m rows and n columns. That is, the multiplication in Equations (A.21) and (A.22) is repeated as many times as there are columns in [B]. Note that, although the product [A][B] can be found as in Equation (A.21), the product [B][A] is not simultaneously defined unless [B] and [A] have the same number of rows and columns. Thus, [A] cannot be premultiplied by [B] if [A][B] is defined unless [B] and [A] are square. Moreover, even if both [A][B] and [B][A] are defined, there is no guarantee that [A][B] = [B][A]. That is, matrix multiplication is not necessarily commutative. 

Conventional CA are defined by assigning to each of the N linearly connected sites, a time-dependent variable Oi t) (i=0,l,.,, N), belonging to a finite commutative ring TZk (usually represented by the integers modulo A , Zk). These site values, or colors, evolve iteratively according to a range-r mapping (j> ... 

The problem now is to find the corresponding Hamiltonian, t Hooft shows that the most obvious construction, obtained by rewriting U(t+l,t) as a product of cyclic elements, unfortunately does not work because at the end of the calculation there is no way to uniquely define the vacuum state. Given a cellular automaton with a local unitary evolution operator U = WgUg and the commutator [Ug, Ug ] 0 if [ af — af j> d for some d > 0, the real problem is therefore to find a Hamiltonian... 

V2 U U Vn, where we have assumed that there are only a finite number of non overlapping subsets Vi. For example, in one dimension, n — 2 and Vi and V2 could represent the sets of even and odd valued sites, respectively. Now divide the set of operators Us into commuting classes, defined by [Us Us ] = 0 whenever afi and, 3 2 are both elements of the same subset Vi. We can then write (perhaps after some additional transformations are performed) U = Uj U2 where Uj = exp -f seV ( ) The full product can be conveniently expressed... 

For the physical interpretation of the theory it is convenient to he able to express the hamiltonian in the form Jkc (k)e(k), with c (k),c(k) satisfying 3-function commutation rales so that number operators can be introduced into the theory. The form (9-619) for the hamiltonian suggests that we define the operators ... 

The above defined operators ( ) and a (k) are hermitian. Furthermore, they satisfy by virtue of their representations the following commutation rules... 

Summarizing, we have noted that the Heisenberg operators Q+(t) obey field free equations i.e., that their time derivatives are given by the commutator of the operator with Ha+(t) = Ho+(0) and that this operator H0+(t) is equal to H(t) = H(0). The eigenstates of H0+ are, therefore, just the eigenstates of H. We can, therefore, identify the states Tn>+ with the previously defined >ln and the operator [Pg.602]

The representation of these commutation rules is again fixed by the requirement that there exist no-particle states 0>out and 0>ln. The -matrix is defined as the unitary operator which relates the in and out fields ... 

Note that in formulating the theory in this axiomatic fashion one does not say anything about the commutation rules satisfied by if/(x) and A [x). The ifi(x) and Au(x) field operators can be regarded as functionals of the corresponding in fields and defined in terms of them. Their commutation rules are consequences of those satisfied by Alnil(x) and ln(x). 

We close with some remarks concerning the commutation rules obeyed by the field operators tp(x), and Au(x). As noted in this section, a consistent procedure to obtain these would be to use the equations of motion (11-460) and (11-461), together with the postulated properties of and Ain. The procedure is, however, not without ambiguities because in the equation defining the current operator (a ), the quantity — (e/2)[ (a )y(1, (a )] must be supplemented by a rule for handling the... 

Here it is taken into account that density matrix p, being a scalar, commutates with any rotation operator, and diq defined in Eq. (7.51) is used. After an analogous transformation, in master equation (7.51) there remains the Hamiltonian, which does not depend on e ... 

As a prelude to the arguments in subsequent sections, it should be recognized that the motion of the system is restricted to the space defined by the variables that commute with J, which may be taken as (or 7, K, ), and the two... 

The commutation relations involving operators are expressed by the so-called commutator, a quantity which is defined by... 

If two matrices are square, they can be multiplied together in any order. In general, the multiplication is not commutative. That is AB BA, except in some special cases. It is said that the matrices do not commute, and this is the property of major importance in quantum mechanics, where it is common practice to define the commutator of two matrices as... 

From (27) and (29) it follows that every component of the total angular momentum operator J = L + S and J2 commute with the Dirac Hamiltonian. The eigenvalues of J2 and Jz are j(j + 1 )h2 and rrijh respectively and they can be defined simultaneously with the energy eigenvalues E. 

These conditions define a matrix algebra which requires at least four anticommuting, traceless (hence even-dimensioned) matrices. The smallest even dimension, n = 2, can only accommodate three anti-commuting matrices, the Pauli matrices ... 

In the Schrodinger picture operators in the case of a closed system do not depend explicitly on the time, but the state vector is time dependent. However, the expectation values are generally functions of the time. The commutator of the Hamiltonian operator H= —(h/2iri)(d/dt) and another operator A, is defined by... 

If the averages defined by (36) are independent of the time, the ensemble is in statistical equilibrium and dg/dt = 0. As a sufficient condition for equilibrium it is, according to (37) therefore necessary that [g, H] = 0. In general therefore, an ensemble is in statistical equilibrium if the density operator commutes with the Hamiltonian. 

As a logical extension, particle number operators are next defined such that N = 2j Nj = bpj. The commutation rules require that... 

---