Common solvents fundamental considerations

A typical extraction manifold is shown in Figure 13.2. The sample is introduced by aspiration or injection into an aqueous carrier that is segmented with an organic solvent and is then transported into a mixing coil where extraction takes place. Phase separation occurs in a membrane phase separator where the organic phase permeates through the Teflon membrane. A portion of one of the phases is led through a flow cell and an on-line detector is used to monitor the analyte content. The back-extraction mode in which the analyte is returned to a suitable aqueous phase is also sometimes used. The fundamentals of liquid liquid extraction for FIA [169,172] and applications of the technique [174 179] have been discussed. Preconcentration factors achieved in FIA (usually 2-5) are considerably smaller than in batch extraction, so FI extraction is used more commonly for the removal of matrix interferences. 

The gathering of fundamental information concerning the initial electron transfer, such as standard potentials, E°, or rather formal potentials, E° for radical cation formation, was earlier greatly hindered by the occurrence of rapid reactions of the intermediates. (See Chapter 1 for a discussion of the difference between formal potentials and standard potentials.) Reaction with impurities in the solvent, or even the solvent itself, and/or rapid proton loss are common reasons for not observing reversible formation of radical cations the consequent irreversibility is in CV associated with a shift in Ep, in the negative direction, from that for reversible oxidation. Considerable progress has been made in countering these difficulties. 

The main specificity of the lEF method is that, instead of starting from the boundary conditions as in the DPCM, it defines the Laplace and Poisson equations describing the specific system under scrutiny, here including also anisotropic dielectrics, ionic solutions, liquids with a flat surface boundary, quadrupolar liquids, and it introduces the relevant specifications by proper mathematical operators. The fundamental result is that the lEF formalism manages to treat structurally different systems within a common integral equation-like approach. In other words, the same considerations exploited in the isotropic DPCM model leading to the definition of a surface cheurge density a(s) which completely describes the solvent reaction response, are still valid here, also for the above mentioned extensions to non-isotropic systems. 

While dansyl chloiide today seems like a common fluorophore, its Introduction by Professor Weber represented a fundamental change in the paradigm of fluorescence spectroscopy. One of Professor Weber s main contributions was the introduction of molecular considerations Into fluorescence spectrosetpy. The dansyl group is solvent sensitive, and one is thus forced to consider its interactions with its local environment. Professor Wfeber recognized that proteins could be labeled with fluorophores, which in turn reveal information about the proteins and their interactions with other molecules. The probes which the Professor developed are still in widespread use, including dansyl chloride, ANS, TNS, and Prodan derivatives. 

---