Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Common level shift

If the sample volume, from which photoelectrons are to be emitted, is put in electrical contact with the spectrometer, charge flows to establish the contact potential, which is the work function difference Sample — Aspect, and the Fermi levels, ep, of the sample and spectrometer are equalized. This is shown schematically in Fig. 2. The work function in the experiment is Aspect and observation of the photoelectron kinetic energies from an atomic species in two different samples thus provides a measure of the shift of the level in question, level i, with respect to eF if one wishes to consider the level shift with respect to some zero of the potential common to all the samples, then any shifts in eF from sample to sample with respect to that same zero must be taken into account. This point... [Pg.85]

Since most "surface-sensitive" techniques sample at least a few atomic planes into the sample, it is difficult to experimentally separate the electronic structure of the outermost plane of atoms from that of the planes below. Theoretical calculations are able to clearly separate surface from bulk electronic structure, of course it is common to calculate a separate electronic density-of-states for each plane in the crystal structure ("layer density-of-states"). Significant changes from the bulk electronic structure are sometimes found for the surface planes in calculations. However, it is difficult to confirm those results experimentally [1]. In some oxides, the bandgap at the surface has been observed to narrow compared to that of the bulk. The measured core-level binding energies of partially coordinated surface atoms are often shifted, by as much as an eV, from their bulk values [32] these are referred to as "surface core-level shifts". However, the experimental separation of surface from bulk electronic structure is at present far from satisfactory. [Pg.16]

In summary, these studies have demonstrated the beneficial effect of obtaining additional sleep prior to periods of sleep loss and the additive benefits of caffeine use. Subjects for the studies were healthy young adults who did not report significant daily caffeine use and who were not sleep deprived prior to the beginning of each study. In the real world, of course, it is common that shift workers will suffer fiom both chronic sleep loss and tolerance to caffeine. Such limitations could reduce the beneficial impact of both prophylactic naps and caffeine in applied settings. On the other hand, knowledge of the ability of naps and caffeine to produce baseline levels of alertness across nocturnal work periods when used correctly should allow planners to develop improved sustained work schedules. [Pg.200]

It is well known from Hartree-Fock studies of molecular systems, that it is very common to have problems of SCF convergence when studying open-shell systems similarly, convergence problems are not rare in the Hartre Fock treatment of spin-polarized crystals. A well-known technique for the solution of convergence problems, in the case of open-shell molecules, is the so-called level-shifting method [85] this approach has shown its effectiveness in the periodic HF context also, especially in the case of crystals containing transition elements. [Pg.124]

The early attempts to develop MR perturbation methods focused on the use of an effective Hamiltonian determined from the Bloch equation [7, 18, 24, 27]. The main drawback of these theories is the intrader state problem, i.e., the appearance of close to zero denominators which give nonphysical contribution to the effective Hamiltonian matrix elements, especially for large CAS spaces where the high lying model functions are energetically not separated from the outer space determinants. To tackle with this problem the application of incomplete model spaces [18, 27], various level shift-based techniques [14, 23, 30, 45] and the concept of intermediate Hamiltonian [26] were intensively studied, but the most common solution is to use a state-specific description, where only a single target state is described [3-5, 8,16,17, 29,44]. [Pg.243]

There are a number of situations in which additional measures must be taken to speed up or establish convergence. One of the most common problems encountered in peptide systems is the occurrence of asymmetric oscillations in the electron distribution from cycle to cycle. In some cases these oscillations damp out on their own, but more often than not, the energy and density matrix undergoes large fluctuations for an indefinite number of SCF cycles. This particular problem can be dealt with quite effectively in conventional MO calculations using what is commonly known as the level shift technique. ... [Pg.768]


See other pages where Common level shift is mentioned: [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.750]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.718]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.1699]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.2871]    [Pg.2877]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.2467]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.1144]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.76]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.50 ]




SEARCH



Level shifting

© 2024 chempedia.info