Power plants combustion

Table 7 lists the results of test bums at two coal-combusting power plants a western Kentucky power plant, which burned pure Illinois Basin coal (Table 4) and two blends of this coal + TDF (99 wt% coal + 1 wt% TDF 97 wt% coal + 3 wt% TDF) in a cyclone boiler (Hower et al. 2001) and the Purdue University power plant, which used a stoker boiler to combust a comparable Illinois Basin coal as well as a blend containing 95 wt% of this coal and 5 wt% TDF (Table 4 this study). 

Combustion Power Plant - A power plant that generates power by combusting a fuel. 

Electrostatic Precipitator - A device used to remove particulate matter from the waste gasses of a combustion power plant. 

Fly Ash - The fine particulate matter entrained in the flue gases of a combustion power plant. 

CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL IN LOW-PRESSURE AIR COMBUSTION POWER PLANTS... 

One of the reasons that Powder River Basin (Wyoming) coals are widely used for pulverized coal combustion power plants (despite the relatively low heating value) is the low sulfur content. With the increased restrictions on sulfur dioxide emission regulations, coal combustion power plants looking to avoid expensive and efficiency-reducing flue gas desulfurization retrofits have switched to low-sulfur Powder River Basin coal. There is also the possibility that western coals can be combined with petroleum coke in order to increase the heating value and decrease the moisture content of the gasification feedstock. 

Haslbeck XL., Black X, Knehn N., Lewis E., Rutkowski M.D., Woods M., Vaysman V. Pnlverized coal oxy-combustion power plants , US DOE-NETL (National Energy Technology Laboratory) Final report 2007/1291, Revision 2, 2008. 

Electrical systems can enjoy a wide variety of power sources ranging from conventional combustion power plants to renewable technologies such as photovoltaic cells or wind turbines (Figure 5.1). 

Gypsum samples were also taken from two Spanish pulverized coal (co) combustion power plants and the mercury species identified were different (Figure 4) [92]. The study was carried out in two (A and B) power plants equipped with high efficiency ESPs and a wet limestone-based with forced oxidation FGD facility. Power plant A bums a coal blend ranging from local sub-bituminous coals (60%) close to lignite to bituminous coals (40%), while power station B burns a blend of antliracites (80%) and petroleum-coke (20%). Gypsum samples were called FGD-A and FGD-B from power station A and B, respectively. 

Designing a zero water effluent for IGCC is easier than designing for direct coal combustion power plants because IGCC plants usually produce fewer water effluents. The 250 MW IGCC power plant under construction in The Netherlands is designed as a zero water effluent discharge plant. 

Modification of direct coal combustion for CO2 removal would be more difficult. CO2 could be removed from the flue gas after conventional combustion by acid gas removal technology. Although this approach has found some commercial application, the low pressure and low concentration of the CO2 in the flue gas makes it a relatively expensive method. Removing 90% of the CO2 from flue gas of a conventional coal-fired boiler would increase the capital cost by a factor of 3.0 and thermal efficiency drops by 12% compared to a conventional direct coal combustion power plant. The larger capital increase and efficiency loss with CO2 recovery is principally due to recovery at low pressure which requires a larger flue gas compression, CO2 absorbers, and increased steam requirements. Depending on the cost of coal and capital, the increased electric cost for CO2 removal with a direct coal combustion power plant is 2.0-3.0 times that of a conventional direct coal combustion power plant. 

It has also been proposed to convert conventional direct coal combustion power plants to oxygen combustion to reduce the CO2 recovery cost. However, this would require over twice the oxygen needed for coal gasification and would result in lower thermal efficiency than IGCC power plants with CO2 recovery in a new plant or in repowered plants. 

Fukudome, K., Shintani, T., Kita, T., and Sasaki, H., Utilization of Coal Ash Produced from Pressurized Fluidized Combustion Power Plant as a Concrete Mineral Admixture, CANMET/ACI Int. Conf. on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Natural Pozzolans in Concr., (V. M. Malhotra, ed.), SP-178 522-544 (1998)... 

Many of the combustion power plants in the U.S. will be affected by NO, and ozone air quality standards. The new regulations for ozone non-attainment areas will affect virtually all existing power plants located in urban areas, particularly in Southern California s South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and throughout the Northeast. The... 

Usually catalysts for NO removal must deal with NO + O2 mixtures, as in the de-NOx process for diesel vehicles or in coal-combustion power plants. In contrast to NgO, NO s interaction with ceria-based materials (and many other catalysts) in Og-rich streams does not lead to the decomposition of the molecule but to oxidation to NOg. This process involves NO chemisorption and the formation of several surface nitrogen species, oxidation of these surface species, and desorption of NOg. In addition, NOg can be re-adsorbed on the catalyst after release. All these processes are discussed in this section. 

---