Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Collective mass transport

Improved sensitivities can be attained by the use of longer collection times, more efficient mass transport or pulsed wavefomis to eliminate charging currents from the small faradic currents. Major problems with these methods are the toxicity of mercury, which makes the analysis less attractive from an eiivironmental point of view, and surface fouling, which coimnonly occurs during the analysis of a complex solution matrix. Several methods have been reported for the improvement of the pre-concentration step [17,18]. The latter is, in fact. [Pg.1932]

The moving-drop method [2] employs a column of one liquid phase through which drops of a second liquid either rise or fall. The drops are produced at a nozzle situated at one end of the column and collected at the other end. The contact time and size of the drop are measurable. Three regimes of mass transport need to be considered drop formation, free rise (or fall) and drop coalescence. The solution in the liquid column phase or drop phase (after contact) may be analyzed to determine the total mass transferred, which may be related to the interfacial reaction only after mass transfer rates have been determined. [Pg.342]

The solutions for moisture uptake presented in this section are based on the experimental condition of a pure water vapor atmosphere. In the next section a derivation of moisture uptake equations is based on both heat and mass transport that are characteristic of moisture uptake in air. The final section of this chapter presents the results of studies where heat transport is unimportant and mass transport dominates the process. Thus, we will have a collection of solutions covering models that are (1) heat transport limited, (2) mass transport limited, (3) heat and mass transport limited, and (4) mass transport limited with a moving boundary for the uptake of water by water-soluble substances. [Pg.714]

Chemical mass is redistributed within a groundwater flow regime as a result of three principal transport processes advection, hydrodynamic dispersion, and molecular diffusion (e.g., Bear, 1972 Freeze and Cherry, 1979). Collectively, they are referred to as mass transport. The nature of these processes and how each can be accommodated within a transport model for a multicomponent chemical system are described in the following sections. [Pg.287]

The topics of heat, mass and momentum transfer, known collectively as transport processes, are fully examined in the books by Welty et al. [21] and Bird et al. [22]. There is a useful introduction to fluid mechanics and heat transfer by Kay and Nedderman [23], while mass transfer is fully discussed by Treybal [24] and Sherwood et al. [25]. Coulson and Richardson [26] also give clear introductions to these subjects. [Pg.23]

While both of these devices use hollow fiber membranes similar to the primary components of kidney dialyzer units, the difference between the two techniques lies in how the analyte undergoes mass transport into the device. Microdialysis sampling is a diffusion-based separation process that requires the analyte to freely diffuse from the tissue space into the membrane inner lumen in order to be collected by the perfusion fluid that passes through the inner lumen of the fiber. Ultrafiltration pulls sample fluid into the fiber lumen by applying a vacuum to the membrane (Figure 6.1). [Pg.159]

Calibration is necessary to allow correlation between collected dialysis concentrations to external sample concentrations surrounding the microdialysis probe. Extraction efficiency (EE) is used to relate the dialysis concentration to the sample concentration. The steady-state EE equation is shown in equation (6.1), where Coutiet is the analyte concentration exiting the microdialysis probe, Ci iet is the analyte concentration entering the microdialysis probe, CtiSSue> is the analyte tissue concentration far away from the probe, Qd is the perfusion fluid flow rate and Rd, Rm, Re, and Rt are a series of mass transport resistances for the dialysate, membrane, external... [Pg.166]

Devolatilization is a mass transport operation. The molecules of the volatile components dissolved in the matrix of the polymeric melt must diffuse to liquid-vapor interfaces, and then be removed and collected. All devolatilization processes, irrespective of the complexity of the equipment in which they take place, are represented schematically by Fig. 8.1. [Pg.409]

The collective diffusion coefficient is thus relevant for the mass-transport at surfaces in systems, which are not in thermodynamic equilibrium. It generally depends on coverage. The above diffusion equation is widely employed to determine D, since the adsorbate concentration is a measurable quantity. In practice, frequently the decay of an adjusted coverage gradient is analyzed and diffusion equation is solved numerically or analytically for a given geometry. This task is considerably simplified when diffusion coefficients independent of coverage exist or may be assumed and ... [Pg.274]

Studies with many types of porous media have shown that for the transport of a pure gas the Knudsen diffusion and viscous flow are additive (Present and DeBethune [52] and references therein). When more than one type of molecules is present at intermediate pressures there will also be momentum transfer from the light (fast) molecules to the heavy (slow) ones, which gives rise to non-selective mass transport. For the description of these combined mechanisms, sophisticated models have to be used for a proper description of mass transport, such as the model presented by Present and DeBethune or the Dusty Gas Model (DGM) [53], In the DGM the membrane is visualised as a collection of huge dust particles, held motionless in space. [Pg.6]

Experimentally, as for the steady-state collection efficiency, the generator electrode current is controlled and the potential of the detector electrode is held at a value corresponding to mass-transport-limited conversion of B to C. [Pg.170]

The bucket-type cutters have the advantage of being able to collect and transport the sample laterally, without the loss of headroom they collect and hold the sample, however, and thus allow material build-up within the bucket if the powder is a little sticky. Another disadvantage is that, whilst the mass of the diverter-type cutter remains the same during its traverse across the falling stream, the mass of the bucket cutter increases rapidly and the drive systems must be powerful enough to maintain its speed. [Pg.7]

Basically, sintering occurs in stages. During the first stage of sintering, the points of contact in a collection of particles grow into necks by mass transport (see also Section... [Pg.386]


See other pages where Collective mass transport is mentioned: [Pg.1936]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.1272]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.6462]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.1936]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.66 ]




SEARCH



Mass transport

© 2024 chempedia.info