Collection efficiency function

Here, C f,t) is the concentration of fluorescent molecules at position f and time t. CEF f) is the collection efficiency function of the confocal microscope setup and Iexc r) denotes the excitation intensity. Q = f, is a bright-... 

Commonly the PSF is also known as the instrument spread function (ISF), the collection efficiency function (CEF) or the spatial detectivity function (SDF).The PSF is a convolution ofthe intensity profile of the excitation light with the volume from which fluorescence is collected (in the one-photon case) see [9] and Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2. 

Fig. 22. Performance cut diameter predictions for typical dry packed bed particle collectors as a function of bed height or depth, packing diameter and packing porosity (void area) S. Bed irrigation increases collection efficiency or decreases cut diameter (271). SoHd lines, = 25 mm dashed lines,...

Katz (R-16) also siwdied wave-plate impingement separators (Fig. 14-Il0b) made up of 90° formed arcs with an 11.1-mm (0.44-iu) radius auda 3.8-mm (0.15-iu) clearance between sheets. The pressure drop is a function of system geometiy. The pressure drop for Katz s system and collection efficiency for seven waves are shown in Fig. 14-111. Katz used the Souders-Brown expression to define a design velocity for the gas between the waves ... 

Jackson and Calvert [Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J., 12, 1075 (1966)] studied the collection of fine fuel-oil-mist particles in beds of V2-iu glass spheres, Raschig rings, and Berl and Intalox saddles. The mist had a mass median particle diameter of 6 Im and a standard deviation of 2.0. The collection efficiency as a function of particle size and gas... 

The collection efficiency of cyclones varies as a function of particle size and cyclone design. Cyclone efficiency generally increases with (1) particle size and/or density, (2) inlet duct velocity, (3) cyclone body length, (4) number of gas revolutions in the cyclone, (5) ratio of cyclone body diameter to gas exit diameter, (6) dust loading, and (7) smoothness of the cyclone inner wall. Cyclone efficiency will decrease with increases in (1) gas viscosity, (2) body diameter, (3) gas exit diameter, (4) gas inlet duct area, and (5) gas density. A common factor contributing to decreased control efficiencies in cyclones is leakage of air into the dust outlet (EPA, 1998). 

It is important to note tlmt tlic deposition rate is a strong function of particle dimneter tluough the term v, wliich appears twice in tlic deposition flux equation. Equation (9.7.10) must be modified to treat process gas streams discliarging particles of a given size distribution. The suggested procedure is somewhat simihu to tlial for calculating overall collection efficiencies for particulate control equipment (12). For this condition, the overall rale is given by... 

Obviously, experiments designed to measure cross-sections as a function of energy are needed. At present, tandem experiments are not capable of high precision at low energies because one must assume details of collision mechanics and because it is difficult to estimate collection efficiencies in forward scattering geometry (15). The extension of all known techniques to lower energy (64, 65) and the further development of pulse methods (58) offer the possibility for advances in this area. 

Following Barry, James et al (1972), and Thomas and Hinchliffe (1972) investigated the use of wire screens for collecting 218Po atoms or ions. Experiments were done in the absense of aerosol particles, yielding collection efficiency as a function of screen dimensions and face velocity. Information was developed on the fraction of deposited o-activity that could be counted from the front and back sides of the screens. 

In practice, the analyst measures the collection efficiency N as a function of time L The time we refer to here is the time required for the electrogenerated intermediate to be swept hydrodynamically from the disc and past the ring. Clearly, t is a function of the rotation speed, so in practice we determine N as a Junction of co. 

The basic instrumentation in the present work is a Royco Model 225/518 High Concentration Particle Counter. The location of the air inlet and light sensing unit of the instrument in the card room has been described previously (2). The inlet was fitted with a vertical elutriator preseparator designed to prevent particles >15 vin aerodynamic diameter from entering the light sensor. Thus the collection efficiency of this instrumentation as a function of particle size should be similar to that of the Vertical Elutriator Cotton Dust Sampler. 

This equation shows that for a given collection efficiency, the precipitator size is inversely proportional to particle drift velocity and directly proportional to gas flow rate. Increasing the gas density (migration velocity is a function of gas viscosity) by reducing its temperature or increasing the pressure will reduce the precipitator size. However, theory does not account for gas velocity. This is a variable that influences particle re-entrainment and the drift velocity. This typically requires an ESP design at lower velocities than predicted in theory. 

---