Cluster-center clustering method

Gelemter and Rose [25] used machine learning techniques Chapter IX, Section 1.1 of the Handbook) to analyze the reaction center. Based on the functionalities attached to the reaction center, the method of conceptual clustering derived the features a reaction needed to possess for it to be assigned to a certain reaction type. A drawback of this approach was that it only used topological features, the functional groups at the reaction center, and its immediate environment, and did not consider the physicochemical effects which are so important for determining a reaction mechanism and thus a reaction type. 

The readout of the cathode plane is somewhat more complicated, since the induced signals extend over several elements. The determination of the position of the avalanche is done by the so-called center of cluster method. The thresholds of the discriminators are chosen such that the induced signal of several cathode wires switches them (see Fig. 13). Two priority encoder systems are connected to the cathode plane in opposite directions. Priority encoders produce the address of the highest numbered input element which receives a signal. Since the systems are connected in opposite directions, system A will deliver the address of the higher numbered cathode wire whose signal is above the threshold value. System B gives the address of the lower wire. 

Isopropyl group (Section 2 13) The group (CH3)2CH— Isotactic polymer (Section 7 15) A stereoregular polymer in which the substituent at each successive chirality center is on the same side of the zigzag carbon chain Isotopic cluster (Section 13 22) In mass spectrometry a group of peaks that differ in m/z because they incorporate differ ent isotopes of their component elements lUPAC nomenclature (Section 2 11) The most widely used method of naming organic compounds It uses a set of rules proposed and periodically revised by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry... 

The Characterization and Properties of Small Metal Particles. Y. Takasu and A. M. Bradshaw, Surf. Defect. Prop. Solids p. 401 1978). 2. Cluster Model Theory. R. P. Messmer, in "The Nature of the Chemisorption Bond G. Ertl and T. Rhodin, eds. North-Holland Publ., Amsterdam, 1978. 3. Clusters and Surfaces. E. L. Muetterties, T. N. Rhodin, E. Band, C. F. Brucker, and W. R. Pretzer, Cornell National Science Center, Ithaca, New York, 1978. 4. Determination of the Properties of Single Atom and Multiple Atom Clusters. J. F. Hamilton, in "Chemical Experimentation Under Extreme Conditions (B. W. Rossiter, ed.) (Series, "Physical Methods of Organic Chemistry ), Wiley (Interscience), New York (1978). 

Thermal reduction at 623 K by means of CO is a common method of producing reduced and catalytically active chromium centers. In this case the induction period in the successive ethylene polymerization is replaced by a very short delay consistent with initial adsorption of ethylene on reduce chromium centers and formation of active precursors. In the CO-reduced catalyst, CO2 in the gas phase is the only product and chromium is found to have an average oxidation number just above 2 [4,7,44,65,66], comprised of mainly Cr(II) and very small amount of Cr(III) species (presumably as Q -Cr203 [66]). Fubini et al. [47] reported that reduction in CO at 623 K of a diluted Cr(VI)/Si02 sample (1 wt. % Cr) yields 98% of the silica-supported chromium in the +2 oxidation state, as determined from oxygen uptake measurements. The remaining 2 wt. % of the metal was proposed to be clustered in a-chromia-like particles. As the oxidation product (CO2) is not adsorbed on the surface and CO is fully desorbed from Cr(II) at 623 K (reduction temperature), the resulting catalyst acquires a model character in fact, the siliceous part of the surface is the same of pure silica treated at the same temperature and the anchored chromium is all in the divalent state. 

---