Cluster analysis definition

Relationship between Palatability and Umami. Yamanaka et at. (40) collected words expressing "palatability". They did this by asking people to write down their definition of palatability, excluding appearance, aroma and texture. From the total of 1900 expressions obtained, 38 of them were selected as important. The similality between each pair of the expressions was measured on a 5-point scale using a mass panel. The data obtained were analyzed by principal component analysis and cluster analysis. As a result, concrete expressions of palatability were classified into the following five groups ... 

The manner in which sample-to-sample resemblance is defined is a key difference between the various hierarchical clustering techniques. Sample analyses may be similar to one another in a variety of ways and reflect interest in drawing attention to different underlying processes or properties. The selection of an appropriate measure of similarity is dependent, therefore, on the objectives of the research as set forth in the problem definition. Examples of different similarity measures or coefficients that have been used in compositional studies are average Euclidean distance, correlation, and cosine. Many others that could be applied are discussed in the literature dealing with cluster analysis (15, 18, 19, 36, 37). 

Similarity and distance between objects are complementary concepts for which there is no single formal definition. In practice, distance as a measure of dissimilarity is a much more clearly defined quantity and is more extensively used in cluster analysis. 

The correlation coefficient is too limiting in its definition to be of value in many applications of cluster analysis. It is a measure only of colinearity between variates and takes no account of non-linear relationships or the absolute magnitude of variates. Instead, distance measures which can be defined mathematically are more commonly encountered in cluster analysis. Of course, it is always possible at the end of a clustering process to substitute distance with reverse similarity the greater the distance between objects the less their similarity. 

Figure 21 shows the resulting dendrogram from the cluster analysis. Rephcate samples from well 30/7a-llz allow definition of the limit of... 

Cluster analysis is therefore a tool of discovery. It may reveal associations and structure in data which, though not previously evident, nevertheless are sensible and useful once found. The results of cluster analysis may contribute to the definition of a formal classification scheme, such as molecular marker source confirmation, or indicate rules for assigning new cases (samples) to classes (groups) for identification and diagnostic purposes. 

Such definitive classification may be achieved with the aid of multivariate pattern recognition techniques such as hierarchical clustering, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and artificial neural network analysis. Hierarchical clustering techniques compare sets of data (e.g. individually acquired spectra or spectra acquired by mapping of tissue) and group the data according to some measure of similarity. For mapping data, the application of cluster analysis... 

One of the most intuitive ways to describe how cluster analysis works in practice is by referring to the agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) method. Beside the common preliminary steps already discussed, that is definition of the metric (Euclidean, Mahalanobis, Manhattan distance, etc.) and calculation of the distance matrix and the corresponding similarity matrix, the analysis continues according to a recursive procedure such as... 

---