Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Chick embryo neural retina cell

Chick embryo neural retina cells have also been grown in culture (Daston et al., 1995), and studies indicate positive responses to chemicals at concentrations similar to those active in in vivo tests. Reinhardt (1993) has reviewed the use of organ slices, aggregate cell cultures and the micromass techniques for the study of neurodev-elopmental toxicity. Two recent reviews of these in vitro systems, especially the micromass and the chick embryo neural retinal cell system, have been published (Daston, 1996a Mirkes, 1996). [Pg.103]

Daston GP, Baines D, Elmore E, Fitzgerald MP, Sharma S (1995) Evaluation of chick embryo neural retina cell culture as a screen for developmental toxicants. Fundam Appl Toxicol, 26 203-210. [Pg.144]

Chick embryo neural retina cell culture model... [Pg.160]

Figure 9-5 The sensitivity of the conceptus to a theoretical teratogen during rat gestation (modified from 161). The most susceptible window is organogenesis with low levels of vulnerability at the time of implantation and the period of functional maturation. Superimposed are the approximations of when the developmental landmarks that are represented in the four in vitro tests occur. The chick embryo neural retina model (CENR) represents events around GD 10-13. The mouse embryonic stem cell test (EST) corresponds roughly to the period of GD 6-10 in the rat, near the peak of sensitivity. Whole embryo culture (WEC) recapitulates the window at the peak of sensitivity, between GD 9-11 or GD 10-12 depending upon the window within which the culture is conducted. Rabbit cultures are also done between GD 10-12. Represented by the single ( ) and double asterisk ( ), respectively, are the initiation and termination of the dosing period in regulatory compliant preclinical embryo/fetal toxicity studies. Thus, the zebrafish is the only model that permits exposure to test article during this important period. Figure 9-5 The sensitivity of the conceptus to a theoretical teratogen during rat gestation (modified from 161). The most susceptible window is organogenesis with low levels of vulnerability at the time of implantation and the period of functional maturation. Superimposed are the approximations of when the developmental landmarks that are represented in the four in vitro tests occur. The chick embryo neural retina model (CENR) represents events around GD 10-13. The mouse embryonic stem cell test (EST) corresponds roughly to the period of GD 6-10 in the rat, near the peak of sensitivity. Whole embryo culture (WEC) recapitulates the window at the peak of sensitivity, between GD 9-11 or GD 10-12 depending upon the window within which the culture is conducted. Rabbit cultures are also done between GD 10-12. Represented by the single ( ) and double asterisk ( ), respectively, are the initiation and termination of the dosing period in regulatory compliant preclinical embryo/fetal toxicity studies. Thus, the zebrafish is the only model that permits exposure to test article during this important period.
Figure 9-6 A generic strategy integrating the three facets of developmental toxicity risk assessment namely (a) the risk of pharmacologic modulation of the therapeutic target during gestation, (b) in silico, SAR and (c) in vitro screening. Abbreviations The chick embryo neural retina (CENR) embryonic stem cell test (EST), whole embryo culture (WEC), Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), Embryo/Fetal Developmental Toxicity (EFD) study. "Front-loading" is the conduct of the EFD study prior to Phase lib. Figure 9-6 A generic strategy integrating the three facets of developmental toxicity risk assessment namely (a) the risk of pharmacologic modulation of the therapeutic target during gestation, (b) in silico, SAR and (c) in vitro screening. Abbreviations The chick embryo neural retina (CENR) embryonic stem cell test (EST), whole embryo culture (WEC), Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), Embryo/Fetal Developmental Toxicity (EFD) study. "Front-loading" is the conduct of the EFD study prior to Phase lib.
Due to the limited applicability of in silico SAR approaches for developmental toxicity, there is more reliance on in vitro screening. From what has been publicly disclosed, it is evident that the four in vitro tests used for industrial screening are chick embryonic neural retina (CENR) micromass culture, whole embryo culture (WEC, rodent or rabbit), and mouse embryonic stem cells (EST). Recently, there has been significant interest within the pharmaceutical industry in the use of zebrafish for developmental toxicity testing,30 but because this aspect is in its infancy, there is little that has been publicly disclosed except limited abstracts and slide decks at several workshops.31 Although reviewed in considerable detail elsewhere,30-32 36 each test will be briefly compared and contrasted here. [Pg.159]


See other pages where Chick embryo neural retina cell is mentioned: [Pg.160]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.110]   


SEARCH



Chick embryo neural retina cell culture model

Chicks

Embryo cells

Embryos chick

Retina

© 2024 chempedia.info