Chemistry, basic hydrocarbons, synthesis

Considering the long saga of hydrocarbon chemistry, it is surprising that two new classes of hydrocarbon - ionically dissociative hydrocarbons and hydrocarbon salts - have been discovered in the last decade. The syntheses of authentic samples as analytically pure solids have revealed the very existence of such novel hydrocarbons in an unquestionable way, but the investigation of their basic features is just in the inchoate stage. The search for such novel hydrocarbons depends primarily on the synthesis and examination of highly stabilized hydrocarbon cations and anions. As mentioned above, until now such elaboration has been concentrated on the carbocation side, and examination of the carbanion moiety has only just started. 

Whereas the synthesis of zeolite occurs in nature and in the laboratory under strongly basic conditions (pH 9-11), they are widely used as catalysts in hydrocarbon chemistry under their acidic form. In order to obtain acidic zeolites, the alkali cations (K, Li, Na, Ca, etc.) are first exchanged by NH4+C1 followed by heating which, after release of ammonia, leaves the proton loosely attached to the framework on the Si-O-Al bridging group (Figure 2.19). 

With the initial synthesis of cyclopropane in 1882 , and the report of its thermal structural isomerization to propene in 1896, this simplest of cyclic hydrocarbons began its extraordinarily fruitful stimulation of fresh insights on fundamental problems in organic chemistry, ranging from basic concepts of ring strain and structural isomerism to questions of thermochemistry and reactivity and of a aromaticity And from the beginning there was controversy, extending a few years before suitably authoritative commentators confirmed the fact that cyclopropane is indeed converted thermally to propene. ... 

When comparing the competing processes for making hydrocarbons from synthesis gas - the Fischer Tropsch CO hydrogenation and the MTG conversion -the process flow sheets show as the main difference the additional step of methanol synthesis for the MTG route. However, product selectivity is basically different for both the conversions. And from this point of view the one or the other route can be the more favourable option as fitting best the particular demand pattern. Selectivity differences fundamentally result from the different kinds of chemistry which are involved Hydrogenation on special metal type catalysts in case of the Fischer Tropsch reaction and a conversion via car-benium ion intermediates on acidic sites, which is additionally constrained by shape selectivity in case of the MTG process. 

---