Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Validation chemical reaction processes

The distinction in reactions and basic operations to prepare and post-process chemical reactions is valid in most cases. However, there is a principal advantage to integrate both chemical process steps. Despite organizational and technical drawbacks, such an integration is physically and chemically advantageous due to more favourable energy balances. One example is the reactive distillation where chemical reactions take place inside the... [Pg.12]

ReaxFF [50] provides a generally valid and accurate way to capture the barriers for various chemical reaction processes (allowed and forbidden reactions) into the force fields needed for large-scale MD simulation. ReaxFF is parameterized exclusively from QM calculations, and has been shown to reproduce the energy surfaces, structures, and reaction barriers for reactive systems at nearly the accuracy of QM but at costs nearly as low as conventional FFs. [Pg.17]

The agreement between the measured and calculated values of these radicals is, however, still a necessary but not a sufficient condition of the accuracy of the chemical reaction mechanism. As for these radicals, their concentrations are determined by the ratio of formation and loss rate, and the possibility cannot be excluded that if the error of formation and loss rates are in the similar magnitude, agreement is obtained when these factors are compensated. For further validation of the HOx chemical reaction processes in the atmosphere, a method of checking of the unknown loss processes of OH has been developed, which produces OH in pulse in the air and measures its time decay to compare with the decay rate calculated firom the simultaneously measured VOCs and NOx concentrations. This method is called the measurement of OH reactivity and it is an effective method for checking the OH loss process relating to the OH budget directly. [Pg.326]

Detailed modeling of complex reaction systems is becoming increasingly important in the analysis, design, and control of chemical reaction processes. A complete incorporation of the chemistry into process models is important in order to obtain truly predictive models that are valid under a wide set of conditions. [Pg.329]

As reactants transfonn to products in a chemical reaction, reactant bonds are broken and refomied for the products. Different theoretical models are used to describe this process ranging from time-dependent classical or quantum dynamics [1,2], in which the motions of individual atoms are propagated, to models based on the postidates of statistical mechanics [3], The validity of the latter models depends on whether statistical mechanical treatments represent the actual nature of the atomic motions during the chemical reaction. Such a statistical mechanical description has been widely used in imimolecular kinetics [4] and appears to be an accurate model for many reactions. It is particularly instructive to discuss statistical models for unimolecular reactions, since the model may be fomuilated at the elementary microcanonical level and then averaged to obtain the canonical model. [Pg.1006]

Because the rates of chemical reactions are controlled by the free energy of the transition state, information about the stmcture of transition states is crucial to understanding reaction mechanism. However, because transition states have only transitory existence, it is not possible to make experimental measurements that provide direct information about their structure.. Hammond has discussed the circumstances under which it is valid to relate transition-state stmcture to the stmcture of reactants, intermediates, and products. His statements concerning transition-state stmcture are known as Hammond s postulate. Discussing individual steps in a reaction mechanism, Hammond s postulate states if two states, as, for example, a transition state and an unstable intermediate, occur consecutively during a reaction process and have neariy the same energy content, their interconversion will involve only a small reorganization of molecular stmcture. ... [Pg.217]

These values show that from the two possible alternatives of ion formation that one is preferred, which leads to the formation of an anion with the largest number of F-, after which, of Cl-ligands. It is remarkable that ionization in Lewis acid mixtures is favoured versus that in pure Lewis acids in all cases. This could be the reason why the polymerization conversion increases when using Lewis acid mixtures as initiators. However, it should be pointed out here that the quantum chemical reaction energies employed are only then comparable with each other, when they are valid for the same process used for modelling the reactions. [Pg.228]

Almost all flows in chemical reactors are turbulent and traditionally turbulence is seen as random fluctuations in velocity. A better view is to recognize the structure of turbulence. The large turbulent eddies are about the size of the width of the impeller blades in a stirred tank reactor and about 1/10 of the pipe diameter in pipe flows. These large turbulent eddies have a lifetime of some tens of milliseconds. Use of averaged turbulent properties is only valid for linear processes while all nonlinear phenomena are sensitive to the details in the process. Mixing coupled with fast chemical reactions, coalescence and breakup of bubbles and drops, and nucleation in crystallization is a phenomenon that is affected by the turbulent structure. Either a resolution of the turbulent fluctuations or some measure of the distribution of the turbulent properties is required in order to obtain accurate predictions. [Pg.342]

The first paper that was devoted to the escape problem in the context of the kinetics of chemical reactions and that presented approximate, but complete, analytic results was the paper by Kramers [11]. Kramers considered the mechanism of the transition process as noise-assisted reaction and used the Fokker-Planck equation for the probability density of Brownian particles to obtain several approximate expressions for the desired transition rates. The main approach of the Kramers method is the assumption that the probability current over a potential barrier is small and thus constant. This condition is valid only if a potential barrier is sufficiently high in comparison with the noise intensity. For obtaining exact timescales and probability densities, it is necessary to solve the Fokker-Planck equation, which is the main difficulty of the problem of investigating diffusion transition processes. [Pg.358]

The solution developed (see Figure 5.5) considers simultaneously, and in an optimal way, the most important aspects affecting the copper production. In order to cover the process itself and the necessary information and decision flow, the solution builds on a valid and robust process model that captures the main chemical reactions and is able to link the variable material amounts with predicted processing times. The main input data comprises ... [Pg.99]

Minimal bounds on the production quantity are most often process dependent. Typically, a minimal campaign length is required if for example a critical mass is necessary to initiate a chemical reaction. The same is valid for maximal bounds on the production quantity. The rationale here is that a cleaning operation may be required every time a certain amount has been produced. Finally, batch size restrictions often arise in the chemical industry, if for example the batch size is determined by a reactor load or, as discussed above, the processing time for a certain production step is independent of the amount of material processed. In these scenarios, when working with model formulations using a discrete time scale, it is important that the model formulation takes into account that lot sizes may comprise of production in several adjacent periods. [Pg.244]


See other pages where Validation chemical reaction processes is mentioned: [Pg.56]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.841]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.249]   


SEARCH



Chemical reaction processes

Chemical validation

© 2024 chempedia.info