Chemical potential canonical form

AB diblock copolymers in the presence of a selective surface can form an adsorbed layer, which is a planar form of aggregation or self-assembly. This is very useful in the manipulation of the surface properties of solid surfaces, especially those that are employed in liquid media. Several situations have been studied both theoretically and experimentally, among them the case of a selective surface but a nonselective solvent [75] which results in swelling of both the anchor and the buoy layers. However, we concentrate on the situation most closely related to the micelle conditions just discussed, namely, adsorption from a selective solvent. Our theoretical discussion is adapted and abbreviated from that of Marques et al. [76], who considered many features not discussed here. They began their analysis from the grand canonical free energy of a block copolymer layer in equilibrium with a reservoir containing soluble block copolymer at chemical potential peK. They also considered the possible effects of micellization in solution on the adsorption process [61]. We assume in this presentation that the anchor layer is in a solvent-free, melt state above Tg. The anchor layer is assumed to be thin and smooth, with a sharp interface between it and the solvent swollen buoy layer. 

The presence of an (applied) potential at the aqueous/metal interface can, in addition, result in significant differences in the reaction thermodynamics, mechanisms, and structural topologies compared with those found in the absence of a potential. Modeling the potential has been a challenge, since most of today s ab initio methods treat chemical systems in a canonical form whereby the number of electrons are held constant, rather than in the grand canonical form whereby the potential is held constant. Recent advances have been made by mimicking the electrochemical model... 

Equations (2.4.15)-(2.4.17) serve as prototype expressions for chemical potentials in other types of systems discussed later and will be referred to as canonical forms. 

We now show that criteria (a)-(c) are met by postulating the following canonical form for the chemical potential of each species in the ideal solution ... 

We now recapitulate three different ways of specifying the chemical potential in canonical form, relative to reference chemical potentials. For q - x, c, m we use Eq. (3.4.8), and we also adopt the special case x xt 1. This leads to the set of relations which appear to be different, but which must ultimately be shown to be equivalent, namely... 

Figure 1.2 gives the comparative graphical interpretations of an elemen tary chemical reaction in commonly accepted energetic coordinates and in the thermodynamic coordinates under the discussion. Note that the traditional energetic coordinates are always related to the fixed (typically, unit) reactant concentrations and, therefore, identify the behavior of standard values of the plotted parameters. As for the thermodynamic coordinates, they illustrate the process that proceeds under real conditions and are not restricted by the standard values of chemical potentials or thermodynamic rushes of the reac tants. The thermodynamic (canonical) form of kinetic equations is conve nient for a combined kinetic thermodynamic analysis of reversible chemical processes, especially for those that proceed in the stationary mode. 

The Kirkwood—Buff (KB) theory of solution (often called fluctuation theory) employs the grand canonical ensemble to relate macroscopic properties, such as the derivatives of the chemical potentials with respect to concentrations, the isothermal compressibility, and the partial molar volnmes, to microscopic properties in the form of spatial integrals involving the radial distribution function. This theory allows one to obtain information regarding some microscopic characteristics of mnlti-component mixtures from measurable macroscopic thermodynamic quantities. However, despite its attractiveness, the KB theory was rarely used in the first three decades after its publication for two main reasons (1) the lack of precise data (in particular regarding the composition dependence of the chemical potentials) and (2) the difficulty to interpret the results obtained. Only after Ben-Naim indicated how to calculate numerically the Kirkwood—Buff integrals (KBIs) for binary systems was this theory used more frequently. 

The KB theory of solution [15] (often called fluctuation theory of solution) employed the grand canonical ensemble to relate macroscopic properties, such as the derivatives of the chemical potentials with respect to concentrations, the isothermal compressibility and the partial molar volumes to microscopic properties in the form of spatial integrals involving the radial distribution function. 

The simulation runs were performed in the grand canonical ensemble, fixing the chemical potential ji, the volume V of the pore and the temperature T. The system typically consisted of 600-700 adsorbed molecules. For the case of attractive pore-wall interaction, the adsorbed molecules formed seven layers parallel to the plane of the pore walls. A rectilinear simulation cell of 10a// by 10a// in the plane parallel to the pore walls was used, consistent with a cutoff of 5a// for the fluid-fluid interaction. The simulation was set up such that insertion, deletion and displacement moves were attempted with equal probability, and the displacement step was adjusted to have a 50% probability of acceptance. Thermodynamic properties were averaged over 100-500 million individual Monte Carlo steps. The length of the simulation was adjusted such that a minimum of fifty times the average number of particles in the system would be inserted and deleted during a single simulation run. 

Many years after, a new emerging form of quantum mechanics, the DFT, appears as the modem quantum frame in which a chemical system (an atom, an ion, a radical, a molecule or several molecules) can be treated in a state of interaction (Parr Yang, 1989). In this modem context, the cornerstone EN definition of Parr as the minus of the chemical potential ( ) of a system in a grand canonical ensemble at zero temperature (7) was formulated (in atomic units), see (Parretal., 1978),j = -/r asinEq. (3.1), when the ground state energy E is assumed to be a smooth function of the total number of electrons N. 

With these assumptions in mind, write the canonical PF of the system of Ng solutes absorbed on M sites at a given temperature. From the PF calculate the general form of the chemical potential of the solute. The solvation process is defined as the process of transferring a solute from a fixed position in an ideal gas phase to a fixed site (say, the Ah site). Calculate the solvation Helmholtz energy, the entropy, and the energy of solvation of s in the limit of Ng/M 0. 

The extensive quantities characterizing the geometrical size of the system (surface area or volume of the layer, etc.) are physical parameters that are independent of the chemical/material properties. Therefore, the canonical forms of the characteristic potentials may not contain capillary quantities directly associated with the interfacial layers. 

Thus, the canonical form (2.5.1) does satisfy the criteria for the properties of ideal solutions. One should note that in Eq. (2.5.1) the chemical potential of i is referred to that of pure i, independently of the other component in the solution. 

We next consider the chemical potential of components forming nonideal solutions in the condensed state. This is based on the canonical formulation of ideal solutions, introduced in... 

Diblock copolymers are known to form mesophases[9,10] in selective solvents micelles, lamellae, worm-like micelles. .. These aggregation effects are relevant for the interfacial behavior of the copolymers the bulk solution acts as a reservoir for the adsorbed layer and imposes the chemical potential //ex- To study the adsorbed layer we write the siuface grand canonical free energy of the layer as... 

---