Chemical bonding wave function

Chemical Studies. Stretching force constants have been used in an investigation of the valence bond wave function from which an estimate has been made... 

Much remains to be done to implement the ideas outlined here about valence bond wave functions, in order to address the many questions about new high-Tc materials. However the fact that it is formulated in real space and is based on chemical bonds, should allow much more direct contact with the chemical aspects than has been previously possible. 

In practice, each CSF is a Slater determinant of molecular orbitals, which are divided into three types inactive (doubly occupied), virtual (unoccupied), and active (variable occupancy). The active orbitals are used to build up the various CSFs, and so introduce flexibility into the wave function by including configurations that can describe different situations. Approximate electronic-state wave functions are then provided by the eigenfunctions of the electronic Flamiltonian in the CSF basis. This contrasts to standard FIF theory in which only a single determinant is used, without active orbitals. The use of CSFs, gives the MCSCF wave function a structure that can be interpreted using chemical pictures of electronic configurations [229]. An interpretation in terms of valence bond sti uctures has also been developed, which is very useful for description of a chemical process (see the appendix in [230] and references cited therein). 

Basis sets can be further improved by adding new functions, provided that the new functions represent some element of the physics of the actual wave function. Chemical bonds are not centered exactly on nuclei, so polarized functions are added to the basis set leading to an improved basis denoted p, d, or f in such sets as 6-31G(d), etc. Electrons do not have a very high probability density far from the nuclei in a molecule, but the little probability that they do have is important in chemical bonding, hence dijfuse functions, denoted - - as in 6-311 - - G(d), are added in some very high-level basis sets. 

Likewise, a basis set can be improved by uncontracting some of the outer basis function primitives (individual GTO orbitals). This will always lower the total energy slightly. It will improve the accuracy of chemical predictions if the primitives being uncontracted are those describing the wave function in the middle of a chemical bond. The distance from the nucleus at which a basis function has the most significant effect on the wave function is the distance at which there is a peak in the radial distribution function for that GTO primitive. The formula for a normalized radial GTO primitive in atomic units is... 

In almost all cases X is unaffected by any changes in the physical and chemical conditions of the radionucHde. However, there are special conditions that can influence X. An example is the decay of Be that occurs by the capture of an atomic electron by the nucleus. Chemical compounds are formed by interactions between the outer electrons of the atoms in the compound, and different compounds have different electron wave functions for these outer electrons. Because Be has only four electrons, the wave functions of the electrons involved in the electron-capture process are influenced by the chemical bonding. The change in the Be decay constant for different compounds has been measured, and the maximum observed change is about 0.2%. 

Fig. 3. The lattice-matched double heterostmcture, where the waves shown in the conduction band and the valence band are wave functions, L (Ar), representing probabiUty density distributions of carriers confined by the barriers. The chemical bonds, shown as short horizontal stripes at the AlAs—GaAs interfaces, match up almost perfectly. The wave functions, sandwiched in by the 2.2 eV potential barrier of AlAs, never see the defective bonds of an external surface. When the GaAs layer is made so narrow that a single wave barely fits into the allotted space, the potential well is called a quantum well.

We now know that electrons in atoms can hold only particular energies and that their probable whereabouts are described by Schrodiiiger s wave function. The energies and probable locations depend on integer numbers, or quantum numbers. Quantum numbers describe the energy and geometry of the possible electronic states of an atom. These states, in turn, deteriiiilie the chemical behavior of the elements—that is, how chemical bonds can form. 

The method of superposition of configurations as well as the method of different orbitals for different spins belong within the framework of the one-electron scheme, but, as soon as one introduces the interelectronic distance rijt a two-electron element has been accepted in the theory. In treating the covalent chemical bond and other properties related to electron pairs, it may actually seem more natural to consider two-electron functions as the fundamental building stones of the total wave function, and such a two-electron scheme has also been successfully developed (Hurley, Lennard-Jones, and Pople 1953, Schmid 1953). 

The atomic orbitals considered above can be used to help describe the wave functions of electrons in chemical bonds. To see this, we start with the simple problem of the H2 molecule (Fig. 1.1). 

In order to include the spin of the two electrons in the wave function, it is assumed that the spin and spatial parts of the wave function can be separated so that the total wave function is the product of a spin and a spatial wave function F — iAspace sp n Since our Hamiltonian for the H2 molecule does not contain any spin-dependent terms, this is a good approximation (NB—the complete Hamiltonian does contain spin-dependent terms, but for hydrogen they are rather small and do not appreciably affect the energetics of chemical bonding). For a two-electron system it turns out that there are four possible spin wave functions they are ... 

A possibly more accurate value for the double bond character of the bonds in benzene (0.46) id obtained by considering all five canonical structures with weights equal to the squares of their coefficients in the wave function. There is some uncertainty aS to the significance of thfa, however, because of- the noii -orthogOnality of the wave functions for the canonical structures, and foF chemical purposes it fa sufficiently accurate to follow the simple procedure adopted above. 

Consider two well-separated atoms A and B with electron wave functions and which are eigen functions of the atoms, with energies and ei. If we bring these atoms closer, the wave functions start to overlap and form combinations that describe the chemical bonding of the atoms to form a molecule. We will neglect the spin of the electrons. The procedure is to construct a new wave function as a linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO), which for one electron has the form... 

Wave functions can be calculated rather reliably with quantum-chemical approximations. The sum of the squares of all wave functions of the occupied orbitals at a site x, y. z is the electron density p(x,y,z) =Hwf. It can also be determined experimentally by X-ray diffraction (with high expenditure). The electron density is not very appropriate to visualize chemical bonds. It shows an accumulation of electrons close to the atomic nuclei. The enhanced electron density in the region of chemical bonds can be displayed after the contribution of the inner atomic electrons has been subtracted. But even then it remains difficult to discern and to distinguish the electron pairs. 

Once computed on a 3D grid from a given ab initio wave function, the ELF function can be partitioned into an intuitive chemical scheme [30], Indeed, core regions, denoted C(X), can be determined for any atom, as well as valence regions associated to lone pairs, denoted V(X), and to chemical bonds (V(X,Y)). These ELF regions, the so-called basins (denoted 2), match closely the domains of Gillespie s VSEPR (Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion) model. Details about the ELF function and its applications can be found in a recent review paper [31],... 

---