Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Charging, surface elimination

The relatively strong interaction of cationic contaminants with negatively charged soil constituents, for example, is expected to decrease bioavailability. This has been shown to be the case for diquat, in which intercalation into internal clay surfaces eliminates microbial degradation of the compound (Weber and Coble, 1968). Decreased bioavailabilities forbenzylamine in association with montmorillonite (Miller Alexander, 1991), quinoline bound to hectorite or montmorillonite (Smith etal., 1992), and cationic surfactants with humic materials or montmorillonite (Knaebel et al., 1994) have also been reported. [Pg.46]

Cellular anionic lipids have a twofold effect on DNA release from the lipo-plexes. They compensate the cationic lipid surface charge and eliminate the electrostatically driven DNA binding to the membrane interface, and they also disrupt the lipoplex structure and facilitate DNA departure into the solution by inducing formation of nonlamellar phases upon mixing with the lipoplex lipids. [Pg.87]

Ferro-Garcia et al. [187] noted that EDTA complexation (see the section on nickel above) may not have the beneficial effect of eliminating the electrostatic repulsion between a positively charged surface and Cu"" (as well as Zn " and Cd- ) cations. This is illustrated in Table 5 and was rationalized by postulating that, in contrast to the smaller inorganic complexes, the Cu-EDTA complex may be excluded from a large fraction of pores in the olive-stone-derived microporous carbon used (with 60% of pores less than 7.5 nm in diameter). [Pg.252]

Electroosmotic flow is unwanted in lEF, since the EOF will disturb the focusing. Hence, surface-modified capillaries are used, that is, capillaries where the surface has been modified to carry no charge, to eliminate EOF, and also to avoid adsorption... [Pg.142]

Wlien an electrical coimection is made between two metal surfaces, a contact potential difference arises from the transfer of electrons from the metal of lower work function to the second metal until their Femii levels line up. The difference in contact potential between the two metals is just equal to the difference in their respective work fiinctions. In the absence of an applied emf, there is electric field between two parallel metal plates arranged as a capacitor. If a potential is applied, the field can be eliminated and at this point tire potential equals the contact potential difference of tlie two metal plates. If one plate of known work fiinction is used as a reference electrode, the work function of the second plate can be detennined by measuring tliis applied potential between the plates [ ]. One can detemiine the zero-electric-field condition between the two parallel plates by measuring directly the tendency for charge to flow through the external circuit. This is called the static capacitor method [59]. [Pg.1894]

Improved sensitivities can be attained by the use of longer collection times, more efficient mass transport or pulsed wavefomis to eliminate charging currents from the small faradic currents. Major problems with these methods are the toxicity of mercury, which makes the analysis less attractive from an eiivironmental point of view, and surface fouling, which coimnonly occurs during the analysis of a complex solution matrix. Several methods have been reported for the improvement of the pre-concentration step [17,18]. The latter is, in fact. [Pg.1932]

To minimize the effects of this difficulty, an initiator is frequentiy employed. Among the numerous suggestions in the Hterature, the most satisfactory industrial procedure is to retain a portion of the Grignard from the preceding batch and to add this portion to the initial ether charge. The purpose of this procedure is to eliminate residual water and to clean the magnesium surface. Once this initiator has been added, the hahde is added at a rate deterrnined by the temperature and the pressure in the reaction vessel. [Pg.394]

Electroultrafiltration (EUF) combines forced-flow electrophoresis (see Electroseparations,electrophoresis) with ultrafiltration to control or eliminate the gel-polarization layer (45—47). Suspended colloidal particles have electrophoretic mobilities measured by a zeta potential (see Colloids Elotation). Most naturally occurring suspensoids (eg, clay, PVC latex, and biological systems), emulsions, and protein solutes are negatively charged. Placing an electric field across an ultrafiltration membrane faciUtates transport of retained species away from the membrane surface. Thus, the retention of partially rejected solutes can be dramatically improved (see Electrodialysis). [Pg.299]

Phospha.te Treatment. Calcium phosphate is virtually insoluble in boiler water. Even small levels of phosphate can be maintained to ensure the precipitation of calcium phosphate in the bulk boiler water, away from heating surfaces. Therefore, the introduction of phosphate treatment eliminates the formation of calcium carbonate scale on tube surfaces. When calcium phosphate is formed in boiler water of sufficient alkalinity, a particle with a relatively nonadherent surface charge is produced. This does not prevent the development of deposit accumulations over time, but the deposits can be controlled reasonably well by blowdown. [Pg.263]

In most cases, the impregnation process is followed by an electrochemical formation where the plaques are assembled into large temporary cells filled with 20—30% sodium hydroxide solution, subjected to 1—3 charge—discharge cycles, and subsequentiy washed and dried. This eliminates nitrates and poorly adherent particles. It also increases the effective surface area of the active materials. [Pg.548]


See other pages where Charging, surface elimination is mentioned: [Pg.1812]    [Pg.1857]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.1442]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.1812]    [Pg.1857]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.813]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.2224]    [Pg.2227]    [Pg.2766]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.268]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.617 ]




SEARCH



Charged surfaces

Surface charge

Surface charges surfaces

Surface charging

© 2024 chempedia.info