Charged particles near field

Figure 8.6 A spinning neutron star (pulsar) appears from Earth to flash with a bright pulse of radiation that matches the period of its rotation. Charged particles near the star s surface rotate with the magnetic field and give off electromagnetic radiation.

With the present paper we pay a tribute to our friend and teacher A. P. Kazantsev. He made the seminal contribution to the now enormous field of activity of mechanical action of light on neutral atoms. He often prophesied the future development for years ahead. Four decades ago he recognized the significance of radiation from accelerated charged particles near metallic surfaces [Kazantsev 1963] that appears to be of importance for dissipative mechanisms in TOT electron transport. 

Similar statements can be made about holes. They, too, have to be transported to the interface to be available for the receipt of electrons there. These matters all come under the influence of the Nernst-Planck equation, which is dealt with in (Section 4.4.15). There it is shown that a charged particle can move under two influences. The one is the concentration gradient, so here one is back with Fick s law (Section 4.2.2). On the other hand, as the particles are changed, they will be influenced by the electric field, the gradient of the potential-distance relation inside the semiconductor. Electrons that feel a concentration gradient near the interface, encouraging them to move from the interior of the semiconductor to the surface, get seized by the electric field inside the semiconductor and accelerated further to the interface. 

Figure 2.2 shows two metal plates with a potential difference between them. An electrically charged particle (such as an electron) moving between the plates will experience a force, owing to an electric field coming from the potential difference. Except near the edge of the plates, the field between them is constant, and equal to... 

The distribution of ions in the diffuse part of the double layer gives rise to a conductivity in this region which is in excess of that in the bulk electrolyte medium. Surface conductance will affect the distribution of electric field near to the surface of a charged particle and so influence its electrokinetic behaviour. The effect of surface conductance on electrophoretic behaviour can be neglected when ka is small, since the applied electric field is hardly affected by the particle in any case. When tea is not small, calculated zeta potentials may be significantly low, on account of surface conductance. 

Summarizing, the far and near field differ in three respects. First they do so in range. Common double layer fields extend over distances of order x" in the absence of an external field such fields are radial for a spherical double layer, as shown In fig. 3.86,bl. On the other hand, the range of the far fields is of the order of the particle radius a, which for the case considered, means that they extend far beyond the double layer. In the second place they differ In magnitude, as already stated. Thirdly, the difference is that in the near field there exist local excess charges, whereas in the far field each volume element is electro-neutral. In mathematical language, p [r,0) = 0, where r and 6 are defined in fig. 3.87. Consequently, the Laplacian of the potential is also zero in the far field. 

---