Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Charged-particle density

Here w, q , r , and v, are, respectively, the mass, the charge, the position, and the velocity of the rtfa particle. The quantities p and j are the charged-particle density and the current of the charged particles, defined by... [Pg.2]

The effect of efficient dissociative recombination is reflected in the daytime ionospheric charged particle densities shown in Fig. 2. In the FJ-region, 02 and NO+ are the most abundant ions, while in the F-region, the higher plasma densities due to increased photoionization rates dramatically reduces the abundance of all molecular ions and 0+ is the principal positively charged species. Figure 2 also depicts a typical metal ion density profile (Me" ") around 100 km. As will be outlined further, this profile can be... [Pg.271]

Some studies have been made of W/O emulsions the droplets are now aqueous and positively charged [40,41 ]. Albers and Overbeek [40] carried out calculations of the interaction potential not just between two particles or droplets but between one and all nearest neighbors, thus obtaining the variation with particle density or . In their third paper, these authors also estimated the magnitude of the van der Waals long-range attraction from the shear gradient sufficient to detach flocculated droplets (see also Ref. 42). [Pg.508]

The atomic scattering factor for electrons is somewhat more complicated. It is again a Fourier transfonn of a density of scattering matter, but, because the electron is a charged particle, it interacts with the nucleus as well as with the electron cloud. Thus p(r) in equation (B1.8.2h) is replaced by (p(r), the electrostatic potential of an electron situated at radius r from the nucleus. Under a range of conditions the electron scattering factor, y (0, can be represented in temis... [Pg.1363]

Electrostatic Interaction. Similarly charged particles repel one another. The charges on a particle surface may be due to hydrolysis of surface groups or adsorption of ions from solution. The surface charge density can be converted to an effective surface potential, /, when the potential is <30 mV, using the foUowing equation, where -Np represents the Faraday constant and Ai the gas law constant. [Pg.544]

Example 4. For a given lattice, a relationship is to be found between the lattice resistivity and temperature usiag the foUowiag variables mean free path F, the mass of electron Af, particle density A/, charge Planck s constant Boltzmann constant temperature 9, velocity and resistivity p. Suppose that length /, mass m time /, charge and temperature T are chosen as the reference dimensions. The dimensional matrix D of the variables is given by (eq. 55) ... [Pg.110]

Fig. 10 shows the radial particle densities, electrolyte solutions in nonpolar pores. Fig. 11 the corresponding data for electrolyte solutions in functionalized pores with immobile point charges on the cylinder surface. All ion density profiles in the nonpolar pores show a clear preference for the interior of the pore. The ions avoid the pore surface, a consequence of the tendency to form complete hydration shells. The ionic distribution is analogous to the one of electrolytes near planar nonpolar surfaces or near the liquid/gas interface (vide supra). [Pg.370]

If we were to forget that the flow of current is due to a random motion which was already present before the field was applied—if we were to disregard the random motion entirely and assume that each and every electron, in the uniform field X, moves with the same steady velocity, the distance traveled by each electron in unit time would be the distance v used in the construction of Fig. 16 this is the value which would lead to a current density j under these assumptions, since all electrons initially within a distance v of the plane AB on one side would cross AB in unit time, and no others would cross. Further, in a field of unit intensity, the uniform velocity ascribed to every electron would be the u of (34) this quantity is known as the mobility of the charged particle. (If the mobility is given in centimeters per second, the value will depend on whether electrostatic units or volts per centimeter are used for expressing the field strength.)... [Pg.44]

Finally, pi is the primary electroviscous coefficient which is a function of the charge on the particle or, more conventionally, the electrostatic potential,, on the "slip-ping plane" which defines the hydrodynamic radius of the particle, and properties (charge, bulk density number, and limiting conductance) of the electrolyte ions (Rubio-Hernandez et al. 2000). [Pg.103]

However, billiard balls are a pretty bad model for electrons. First of all, as discussed above, electrons are fermions and therefore have an antisymmetric wave function. Second, they are charged particles and interact through the Coulomb repulsion they try to stay away from each other as much as possible. Both of these properties heavily influence the pair density and we will now enter an in-depth discussion of these effects. Let us begin with an exposition of the consequences of the antisymmetry of the wave function. This is most easily done if we introduce the concept of the reduced density matrix for two electrons, which we call y2. This is a simple generalization of p2(x1 x2) given above according to... [Pg.38]

The dependence of T on energy for charged-particle decay can be found as follows. The decay rate is the probability density flux integrated over surface area at infinity, i.e. [Pg.36]

Fig. 4.10. Portion of the red spectrum of the H II galaxy Tololo 0633-415 with a redshift of 0.016, showing diagnostic features for helium (Ha and X 6678), electron density ([S n]) and ionization ([S hi]). The features marked cosmic ray are due to impacts of charged particles on the CCD detector. After Pagel et al. (1992). Fig. 4.10. Portion of the red spectrum of the H II galaxy Tololo 0633-415 with a redshift of 0.016, showing diagnostic features for helium (Ha and X 6678), electron density ([S n]) and ionization ([S hi]). The features marked cosmic ray are due to impacts of charged particles on the CCD detector. After Pagel et al. (1992).

See other pages where Charged-particle density is mentioned: [Pg.403]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.1613]    [Pg.1802]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.240]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 ]




SEARCH



Charge density, charged particles

Charge density, charged particles

Charged particles

Charged particles charge-current density

Current density, charged particles

Particle based density/charge distribution

Particle charge

Particle charge density

Particle charging

Particle density

Particle surface charge density

© 2024 chempedia.info