Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Cathodic hydrogen evolution cathodes

The standard electrode potential for zinc reduction (—0.763 V) is much more cathodic than the potential for hydrogen evolution, and the two reactions proceed simultaneously, thereby reducing the electrochemical yield of zinc. Current efficiencies slightly above 90% are achieved in modem plants by careful purification of the electrolyte to bring the concentration of the most harmful impurities, eg, germanium, arsenic, and antimony, down to ca 0.01 mg/L. Addition of organic surfactants (qv) like glue, improves the quaUty of the deposit and the current efficiency. [Pg.174]

The low current efficiency of this process results from the evolution of hydrogen at the cathode. This occurs because the hydrogen deposition overvoltage on chromium is significantly more positive than that at which chromous ion deposition would be expected to commence. Hydrogen evolution at the cathode surface also increases the pH of the catholyte beyond 4, which may result in the precipitation of Cr(OH)2 and Cr(OH)2, causing a partial passivation of the cathode and a reduction in current efficiency. The latter is also inherently low, as six electrons are required to reduce hexavalent ions to chromium metal. [Pg.119]

The ions, M , formed by this reaction at a rate, may be carried into a bulk solution in contact with the metal, or may form insoluble salts or oxides. In order for this anodic reaction to proceed, a second reaction which uses the electrons produced, ie, a reduction reaction, must take place. This second reaction, the cathodic reaction, occurs at the same rate, ie, = 7, where and are the cathodic and anodic currents, respectively. The cathodic reaction, in most cases, is hydrogen evolution or oxygen reduction. [Pg.274]

If the potential of a metal surface is moved below line a, the hydrogen reaction line, cathodic hydrogen evolution is favored on the surface. Similarly a potential below line b, the oxygen reaction line, favors the cathodic oxygen reduction reaction. A potential above the oxygen reaction line favors oxygen evolution by the anodic oxidation of water. In between these two lines is the region where water is thermodynamically stable. [Pg.276]

Mercury Cells. The cathode material ia mercury cells, mercury [7439-97-6] Hg, has a high hydrogen overvoltage. Hydrogen evolution is suppressed and sodium ion reduction produces sodium amalgam [11110-32-4J, HgNa. [Pg.76]

The sum of all the cathodic partial reactions is included in e.g., oxygen reduction according to Eq. (2-17) and hydrogen evolution according to Eq. (2-19). The intermediate formation of anode metal ions of anomalous valence is also possible ... [Pg.182]

Even in good alloys and under favorable conditions, the a value does not lie above about 0.6. In enamelled storage tanks where the current requirement is low, the a value can fall to as low as about 0.1. The cause of the high proportion of selfcorrosion is hydrogen evolution, which occurs as a parallel cathodic reaction according to Eq. (6-5b) or by free corrosion of material separated from the anode on the severely craggy surface [2-4, 19-21]. [Pg.191]

The voltages AU and rj are defined by Eqs. (24-69) and (24-68a) and have a constant value of about 0.3 V. It is shown in Section 24.4.4 that with overprotection (i.e., by polarization into the range of hydrogen evolution) the cathodically protected range cannot be markedly lengthened. Therefore Eq. (10-5) is basic for the cathodic protection of pipelines. [Pg.266]

Figure 21-6 shows the possibility of reducing the overvoltage of cathodic hydrogen evolution. One can also reduce restrictions in the O2 reduction hy using copper in lead alloys. Such alloying elements can be very effective because they... [Pg.483]

Figure 4-419 illustrates the concept of corrosion process under concentration polarization control. Considering hydrogen evolution at the cathode, reduction rate of hydrogen ions is dependent on the rate of diffusion of hydrogen ions to the metal surface. Concentration polarization therefore is a controlling factor when reducible species are in low concentrations (e.g., dilute acids). [Pg.1265]

It follows from equation 1.45 that the corrosion rate of a metal can be evaluated from the rate of the cathodic process, since the two are faradai-cally equivalent thus either the rate of hydrogen evolution or of oxygen reduction may be used to determine the corrosion rate, providing no other cathodic process occurs. If the anodic and cathodic sites are physically separable the rate of transfer of charge (the current) from one to the other can also be used, as, for example, in evaluating the effects produced by coupling two dissimilar metals. There are a number of examples quoted in the literature where this has been achieved, and reference should be made to the early work of Evans who determined the current and the rate of anodic dissolution in a number of systems in which the anodes and cathodes were physically separable. [Pg.83]

The hydrogen evolution reaction (h.e.r.) and the oxygen reduction reaction (equations 1.11 and 1.12) are the two most important cathodic processes in the corrosion of metals, and this is due to the fact that hydrogen ions and water molecules are invariably present in aqueous solution, and since most aqueous solutions are in contact with the atmosphere, dissolved oxygen molecules will normally be present. [Pg.96]

Much of the information available on resistance of nickel-iron alloys to corrosion by mineral acids is summarised by Marsh. In general, corrosion rates decrease sharply as the nickel content is increased from 0 to 30-40%, with little further improvement above this level. The value of the nickel addition is most pronounced in conditions where hydrogen evolution is the major cathodic reaction, i.e. under conditions of low aeration and agitation. Results reported by Hatfield show that the rates of attack of Fe-25Ni alloy in sulphuric and hydrochloric acid solutions, although much lower than those of mild steel, are still appreciable (Tables 3.35 and 3.36). In solutions of nitric acid, nickel-iron alloys show very high rates of corrosion. [Pg.580]


See other pages where Cathodic hydrogen evolution cathodes is mentioned: [Pg.112]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.2431]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.772]    [Pg.816]    [Pg.821]    [Pg.1230]    [Pg.1236]    [Pg.1239]    [Pg.1294]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.65 ]




SEARCH



Cathodic hydrogen evolution volcano plots

Cathodic process hydrogen evolution

Electrocatalysis cathodic hydrogen evolution

Evolution of Hydrogen at Other Cathodes

Evolution of Hydrogen at a Silver Cathode

Hydrogen cathodic evolution

Hydrogen cathodic evolution

Hydrogen evolution

In Situ Activation of Cathodes for Hydrogen Evolution by Electrodeposition

Mercury cathodes, hydrogen evolution

© 2024 chempedia.info