Hyperconjugation carbocations

It is important to note the relationship of C—H and C—C hyperconjugation to the reactivity as well as the structure of carbocations. Hyperconjugation represents electron sharing with an empty orbital and can lead to structural changes or... 

Recall H02 in which a similar orbital system was encountered (p. 41). Figure 11.19 compares hyperconjugation of a carbocation, hyperconjugation of a radical, and the He2 molecule. As we saw in Chapter 1, He2" is held together (bound) by over 60 kcal/mol. 

Secondary isotope effects at the position have been especially thoroughly studied in nucleophilic substitution reactions. When carbocations are involved as intermediates, substantial /9-isotope effects are observed. This is because the hyperconjugative stabliliza-... 

This reanangement is shown in orbital terms in Figure 5.8. The relevant orbitals of the secondary car bocation are shown in structure (a), those of the transition state for reanangement in (b), and those of the tertiary carbocation in (c). Delocalization of the electrons of the C—CH3 a bond into the vacant p orbital of the positively charged car bon by hyperconjugation is present in both (a) and (c), requires no activation energy, and... 

Hyperconjugation, as it i termed, implies that the electron pair associated with out-of-plane CH bond is donated into the empty p Orbital at the carbocation center. 

Figure 6.12 Stabilization of the ethyl carbocation, CH3CH2+, through hyperconjugation. Interaction of neighboring C H

Draw a skeletal structure of the following carbocation. Identify it as primary, secondary, or tertiary, and identify the hydrogen atoms that have the proper orienta- tion for hyperconjugation in the conformation shown. 

The following carbocation is an intermediate in the electrophilic addition reaction of HCl with two different alkenes. Identify both, and tell which C-H bonds in the carbocation are aligned for hyperconjugation with the vacant p orbital on the positively charged carbon. 

Hyperconjugation (Sections 6.6, 6.9) An interaction that results from overlap of a vacant p orbital on one atom with a neighboring C-H a bond. Hyperconjugation is important in stabilizing carbocations and in stabilizing substituted alkenes. 

In the conformation shown, only the methyl-group C—H that is parallel to the carbocation p orbital can show hyperconjugation. 

The stability order can be explained by hyperconjugation and by the field effect. In the hyperconjugation explanation, we compare a primary carbocation with a tertiary. It is seen that many more canonical forms are possible for the latter ... 

Since the central carbon of tricoordinated carbocations has only three bonds and no other valence electrons, the bonds are sp and should be planar. Raman, IR, and NMR spectroscopic data on simple alkyl cations show this to be so. In methylcycohexyl cations there are two chair conformations where the carbon bearing the positive charge is planar (9 and 10), and there is evidence that difference is hyperconjugation make 10 more stable. Other evidence is that carbocations are difficult to form at bridgehead atoms in [2.2.1] systems, where they cannot be planar (see p. 397). ° Bridgehead carbocations are known, however, as in [2.1.1]... 

As with carbocations, the stability order of free radicals is tertiary > secondary > primary, explainable by hyperconjugation, analogous to that in carbocations... 

The free t-butyl cation [7" ] in the gas phase is nothing more than a species detectable by the electron impact method (Yeo and Williams, 1970). However, it is not only an observable species by nmr studies in SbFs/FSOsH (Olah et al., 1964), but can be isolated from the solution in the form of its SbF or Sb2Ffi salt (Olah and Lukas, 1967a,b Olah et al., 1973 Yannoni et al., 1989). The crystal structure shows that this ion is planar and its carbon-carbon bonds are shortened to 144.2 pm (Hollenstein and Laube, 1993). Its particular electronic stabilization among aliphatic carbocations is attributed by physical organic chemists to the operation of both inductive and hyperconjugative effects in the cr bond system. 

Replacing an a-alkyl snbstituent by an a-aryl group is expected to stabilize the cationic center by the p-Jt resonance that characterizes the benzyl carbocations. In order to analyze such interaction in detail, the cumyl cation was crystallized with hexafluoroantimonate by Laube et al. (Fig. 13) A simple analysis of cumyl cation suggests the potential contributions of aromatic delocalization (Scheme 7.3), which should be manifested in the X-ray structure in terms of a shortened cationic carbon—aromatic carbon bond distance (C Cat). Similarly, one should also consider the potential role of o-CH hyperconjugation, primarily observable in terms of shortened CH3 distances. Notably, it was found experimentally that the Cai distance is indeed shortened to a value of 1.41 A, which is between those of typical sp -sp single bonds (1.51 A) and sp -sp double bonds (1.32 A). In the meantime, a C -CH3 distance of 1.49 A is longer than that observed in the tert-butyl cation 1 (1.44 A), and very close to the normal value for an sp -sp single bond. 

A more complete discussion of the mechanism of addition of hydrogen halides to alkenes is given in Chapter 6 of Part A. In particular, the question of whether or not discrete carbocations are involved is considered there. Even when a carbocation is not involved, the regioselectivity of electrophilic addition is the result of attack of the electrophile at the more electron-rich carbon of the double bond. Alkyl substituents increase the electron density of the terminal carbon by hyperconjugation (see Part A, Section 1.1.8). 

This reflects the relative ease with which the C—H bond in the alkane precursor will undergo homolytic fission, and more particularly, decreasing stabilisation, by hyperconjugation or other means, as the series is traversed. There will also be decreasing relief of strain (when R is large) on going from sp3 hybridised precursor to essentially sp2 hybridised radical, as the series is traversed. The relative difference in stability is, however, very much less than with the corresponding carbocations. 

---